1 / 41

Sexual Harassment

Sexual Harassment. City Of Arlington Human Resources Department. Sexual Harassment Jury Awards.

findlay
Download Presentation

Sexual Harassment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sexual Harassment City Of Arlington Human Resources Department

  2. Sexual Harassment Jury Awards A secretary worked for a law firm for 3 months. During one of those 3 months, she worked for an attorney who poured M&M’s into her blouse breast pocket, grabbed her and asked which breast was bigger. He grabbed her hips at a luncheon and asked repeatedly, “What is the wildest thing you have done?”

  3. Sexual Harassment Jury Awards The jury awarded $50,000 in compensatory damages, but awarded $3.5 million in punitive damages. $225,000 in punitive damages was awarded against the harassing attorney personally. Attorneys’ fees in the case were over $1.8 million. Weeks v. Baker and McKenzie

  4. Sexual Harassment Jury Awards A jury awarded damages of $35,000 and punitive damages of $50 million against Wal-Mart when a female employee was subjected to repeated jokes and sexual comments. The award was reduced to $5 million and the case was appealed.

  5. Sexual Harassment Jury Awards On appeal, the jury award was reduced to $35,000 actual damages, $1 back pay and $350,000 in punitive damages. Several women complained about the supervisor’s conduct, and management ignored the complaint. Kimzey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

  6. Sexual Harassment Jury Awards A male employee claimed his female supervisor sexually harassed him on a daily basis by expressing her sexual interest in him, kissing & embracing him and fondling his genitals. She vehemently denied the charges and stated that he sexually harassed her. Still,….

  7. Sexual Harassment Jury Awards The jury believed him and awarded him $82,000 for economic loss, $375,000 for emotional distress, and $550,000 in punitive damages. The harassing supervisor was ordered to pay $10,000 personally to the employee. The case will be appealed. Gutierrez v. California Acrylic Industries d/b/a Cal-Spas

  8. A National Epidemic 42% of federal female workers reported being sexually harassed within a 2 year period. (Merit Systems Protection Bd, 1998 Half or more of working women can expect to be sexually harassed during their careers. (National Council for Research on Women, 1991)

  9. A National Epidemic Of high level female public administrators in five states, including Texas: 6-16% experienced unwelcome sexual advances 11-24% experienced requests for sexual favors 14-36% experienced offensive physical contact 33-60% experienced some offensive verbal behavior “Sexual Harassment in the States” in Women and Men of the States: Public Administrators at the State Level, 1992

  10. A National Epidemic 52% of companies in the American Management Association reported one or more allegations of sexual harassment within the past five years. (American Management Association, 1991) The number of EEO complaints alleging sexual harassment nearly doubled from 1992 to 1993, rising from 6127 complaints to 11,098. (Equal Employment Opportunities Commission

  11. EEOC Definition of Sexual Harassment Unwelcome sexual advances, request for sexual favors or verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature when: Submission to such conduct is made a term or condition of an individual’s continued employment, promotion or other condition of employment. This can occur by clearly stated or implied words or actions

  12. Definition of Sexual HarassmentCont’d. Submission to or rejection of such conduct is used as a basis for employment decisions affecting an individual employee. Such conduct is intended to interfere or result in interference with an employee’s work performance or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment for an employee.

  13. Court Decisions In Harris v Forklift Systems, Inc., the Supreme Court introduced a four factor “totality of circumstances” analysis in determining whether an environment is hostile or abusive: Frequency of discriminatory conduct Severity of conduct Whether the conduct is physically threatening or humiliating or a mere offensive utterance, and Whether the conduct unreasonable interferes with an employee’s work performance

  14. Prohibited Items in the Workplace Nude pictures Sexually oriented magazines or posters Other words or pictures of a sexually suggestive nature

  15. Prohibited Items Playboy/Penthouse Centerfolds Snap-On Tool Calendars Harley Davidson Calendars Firefighter Calendars (male and female) Pin-up photos These types of calendars have been used as evidence in court cases. (This is not all the items prohibited, just some examples)

  16. Sexually-oriented Material Playboy Playgirl Hustler Cosmo Family Circle Redbook Womens Day People

  17. Sexually-oriented Material Other words or pictures of a sexually suggestive nature. Items downloaded from the internet Cartoons, graffiti, derogatory posters, drawings, etc. Any of the above can create a hostile work environment.

  18. Verbal Harassment Derogatory or vulgar comments regarding a person’s gender Sexually vulgar language Remarks about a person’s physical anatomy or characteristics Threats of physical harm Distribution of written or graphic sexual materials

  19. Verbal Harassment Examples Derogatory or vulgar comments regarding a persons gender Whore Slut Bitch Sweetie Honey Prick Pretty Boy Dickhead Limp-wristed Ridicule in front of others Sexual nicknames Sexually vulgar language

  20. Remarks - Physical Anatomy “She’s really stacked” “She’s healthy” “You’re looking fine” “You look good in short skirts” Comments about breast, butts, legs, etc.

  21. Physical Harassment Prohibitions Touching another person in a sexually suggestive way Touching another so as to invade his/her personal space Intentional touching another’s breast, genital areas, or derrieres Physical contact, such as pushing or threats to take such action

  22. Physical Harassment Impeding one’s movement Pushing, shoving, or threatening such action Touching sexually (usually male on female) Stroking one’s hair Stroking one’s shoulders/neck Rubbing one’s arm, leg, back, etc.

  23. Physical Harassment More often male on male “I’ll take you out back and whip your ass” “I’ll get your mind right” “I’ll see you after shift” “I’ll take care of you later” “I’ll stump break you”

  24. Other Types of Physical Harassment These may include, but are not limited to: Punching, pushing, etc. Brushing against another’s body Subtle pressure for sexual favors for employment, pay, promotion or other job benefits Granting preferential treatment to employees in return for sexual favors

  25. Other Types of Sexual Harassment Sexual innuendoes Sexual bragging Jokes of a sexual nature Sexual propositions Sexually suggestive cartoons Suggestive or insulting sounds Leering, whistling, or obscene gestures

  26. Case Examples Male employee ridiculed victim in front of others. Supervisor laughed at vulgarities, sexual remarks. Posted “pin-ups” Created sexual nicknames Supervisor complimented employee on anatomy. Supervisor made comments about a subordinates breast, told her to “loosen up”. Male employee subjected to sex related comments, threats of rape, etc. Supervisor told employee that he must go on a date or clean the toilets.

  27. Sexual Harassment Policy No employee shall engage in sexual harassment of any employee, applicant, or any other individual. Sexual harassment includes: Sexual favors Request for sexual favors Other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature when:

  28. Sexual Harassment Policy Submission to or rejection of such conduct is used as a basis for employment decisions affecting an individual employee. Such conduct is intended to interfere or result in interference with an employee’s work performance or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment for an employee.

  29. Sexual Harassment Policy Such conduct has the purpose or effect of interfering with an individual’s work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment or is prejudicial to good order or discipline, whether or not it is directly linked to the granting or denial of an economic benefit; or...

  30. Sexual Harassment Policy Any person in a supervisory position uses or condones implicit or explicit sexual behavior to control, influence, or affect an individual’s employment. An employee makes verbal comments, gestures, or physical contact of a sexual nature.

  31. Official Oppression An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor. Any individual adjudged guilty of a Class A misdemeanor may be punished by: A fine not to exceed $4000.00 Confinement in a jail for a term not to exceed one year Both a fine and confinement

  32. Official Oppression In this section, “sexual harassment” means unwelcome sexual advances, request for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, submission to which is made a term or condition of a person’s exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, either explicitly or implicitly.

  33. Official Oppression A public servant acting under color of his office or employment commits and offense if he: Intentionally subjects another to sexual harassment. For purposes of this section, a public servant acts under color of his office or employment if he acts or purports to act in an official capacity or takes advantage of such actual or purported capacity.

  34. Fired Officer Gets Probation for Harassment He pleaded guilty to official oppression in case involving 911 operator by Steve Scott, Staff Writer of The Dallas Morning News September 29, 1995 A fired Dallas police sergeant was sentenced to two years of probation Thursday for sexually harassing a 911 operator under his supervision last year. David Ray Beane, 38, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of official oppression. No conviction will appear on his record if he successfully completes the deferred adjudication probation. Visiting County Criminal Court Judge Cas Dunlap also fined Mr. Beane $2,000. Authorities accused Mr. Beane of misusing his authority as a police officer by sexually harassing the woman, a civilian Police Department employee, between February and April last year. Investigators with the Police Department’s public integrity section filed the charges against Mr. Beane last fall. The woman testified Thursday that Mr. Beane had harassed her by brushing against her in a hallway, trying to kiss her and telling he would “teach her things that would drive a woman wild.” Prosecutors had sought regular probation, in which a conviction would have appeared on Mr. Beane’s record. His attorney, Robert Cady, argued that a conviction would severely hamper his client’s chances of getting a new job to support his wife and two children. Judge Dunlap said he also considered the effect of Mr. Beane’s behavior on the woman he harassed. “I thought it was important that nothing was brought out to indicate that she had been traumatized to the extent that it had any lasting effect,” he said, noting that the woman had not felt the need to leave work. Police said last year that they were investigating complaints that Mr. Beane had harassed two other employees, but prosecutors presented no evidence of other victims Thursday. Police Chief Ben Click fired Mr. Beane last October, a day after Dallas County grand jurors returned an indictment. “The chief at the time felt it was necessary to take this action to protect the integrity of the department and to send a message that this type of behavior, by a supervisor toward a subordinate employee, would not be tolerated,” said Sgt. Jim Chandler, a police spokesman. Mr. Beane had been a Dallas officer for 15 years and had received six commendations.

  35. Plaintiff was a personnel recruiter for Waffle House. Three executives of the company called her “Little Miss Big Tits” and “our Dolly Parton.” One employee stuck a Polaroid camera in between her legs and took a picture of her crotch. She repeatedly complained to management and nothing was done. She was terminated when she complained to the new vice-president.

  36. A jury from the Northern District of Texas (our district) awarded her $687,000 in actual damages and $7.4 million in punitive damages for the sexual harassment, termination, and tortious interference with a new business she tried to start after her termination. The case will be appealed. Scribner v. Waffle House

  37. Sexual Harassment Prevention Each employee in the City is responsible for assisting in the prevention of sexual harassment through the following acts: Refraining from participating in, or encouragement of, actions that could be perceived as sexual harassment; reporting acts of harassment to a supervisor, and encouraging any employee, who confides that he/she is being harassed, to report those acts to a supervisor.

  38. Sexual Harassment Proactive Steps Each supervisor is responsible for taking proactive steps to prevent sexual harassment from occurring. These responsibilities include: Monitoring the unit work environment on a daily basis for signs that harassment may be occurring; Counseling all employees on the types of behavior prohibited, and the City’s procedures for reporting and resolving complaints of harassment.

  39. Sexual Harassment Proactive Steps(Supervisor Responsibilities, Cont.) Sexual Harassment Proactive Steps(Supervisor Responsibilities, Cont.) Stopping any observed acts that may be considered harassment, and taking appropriate steps to intervene, whether on not the involved employees are within his/her line of supervision Taking immediate action to limit the work contact between two employees when there has been a complaint of harassment, pending investigation.

More Related