1 / 11

Further thoughts about dryline formation Bart Geerts, University of Wyoming

Further thoughts about dryline formation Bart Geerts, University of Wyoming. Miao and Geerts (2006) provide rather strong evidence that the fine-scale convergence is driven by a solenoidal circulation and thus a density difference in the convective BL (CBL).

ferrol
Download Presentation

Further thoughts about dryline formation Bart Geerts, University of Wyoming

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Further thoughts about dryline formationBart Geerts, University of Wyoming Miao and Geerts (2006) provide rather strong evidence that the fine-scale convergence is driven by a solenoidal circulation and thus a density difference in the convective BL (CBL). However, there may be other mechanisms: topography (ridgeline) contrast in CBL depth, and thus differential vertical momentum transfer during the deepening stage of the CBL land use contrast ?? For all these mechanisms, scale matters: a better understanding of the relevant scales is important. Miao, Q., and B. Geerts, 2006: Fine-scale vertical structure and dynamics of some dryline boundaries observed in IHOP. Mon Wea. Rev., accepted

  2. other studies have documented a density difference

  3. The density difference across well-defined drylines is small compared to strong density currents, but comparable to sea breezes  at small scales (~3-30 km?) a dryline appears no different from other radar “fine-lines”.

  4. Differential vertical momentum transfer due to different CBL depths: is this a cause of fine-scale convergence? (dry side) 6 May 1995 (VORTEX) Atkins et al 1998, Mon. Wea. Rev.

  5. change in momentum towards the dryline, on the dry side of the developing dryline

  6. Vertical momentum transfer?For this process to be effective,we want westerly (“towards the dryline”) momentum to exist over the depth over which the dryline is deepening.Ths process seems to be of little relevance in the VORTEX and IHOP cases examined, but the possibility remains. Even if the process is important, the question remains what causes the CBL depth discontinuity in the first place.

  7. Temporal changes of differences across several drylines IHOP (3 km averages) VORTEX-II (10 km averages)

  8. So what drives the density difference? • Even in a boundary layer with vigorous convective motions, relatively small horizontal θv differences drive a solenoidal circulation in which the less-dense air (usually the dry air) rises over the denser air. • Fine-scale convergence lines (drylines or other radar fine-lines) are expected to form whenever the mesoscale θv gradient exceeds some threshold ( 1.0K/ 25km? Less?). • The strong diurnal signal observed in all cases suggests that the driving force is the east-west gradient in daytime surface buoyancy flux over the southern/central Great Plains. • On days with a large east-west gradient in daytime surface buoyancy flux, the threshold may be exceeded in several locations, and initially multiple fine-lines may form.

  9. sonde 08 • combine fine-scale measurements with larger scale efforts (hi-res modelling and mesoscale transect of surface fluxes) • mean dryline longitude: ~100.6W (101.0W in June) (Hoch and Markowski 2005, J Climate) • strong assets present: • AMA and LBB radars close enough for clear-air obs • dense West Texas mesonet, denser towards Lubbock (LBB) where the dryline tends to be best defined. • see map next page

More Related