1 / 6

Session 2 – WISE SoE TCM data processing and quality issues

Session 2 – WISE SoE TCM data processing and quality issues. Session 2 – Objective & Guiding Questions. Objective: To clarify the WISE SoE TCM processing phase & indicator aggregation steps; to discuss specific QA/QC issues on raw &

faustine-gaynor
Download Presentation

Session 2 – WISE SoE TCM data processing and quality issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Session 2 – WISE SoE TCM data processing and quality issues

  2. Session 2 – Objective & Guiding Questions • Objective: • To clarify the WISE SoE TCM processing phase & indicator • aggregation steps; to discuss specific QA/QC issues on raw & • indicator data; to identify challenges and opportunities to improve • QA/QC and data coverage/use • Guiding questions: • Processing phase raw data & responsabilities clear? • Opportunities for improvement?Eionet & EEA • Aggregation phase & data needs clear? • Specific QA/QC issues (raw & aggregated): Primary key values; • RSC duplicates; Stations Id´s and mapping WFD; Data • resubmission & recoding; Building trends; Waterbody types

  3. Session 2 - Main topics from questionnaires • Difficulties with reporting process (Data Dictionaries; Validation Rules) and better clarification on changes • “ICES reporting” – avoiding duplications • Other Regional Sea Conventions & Eionet reporting: BSC & UNEP-MAP • Updates on DD (Eionet reporting) vs ICES reporting • Earlier publication of DD changes • Feedback on QA/QC - using email & CDR • Ways to simplify overall process (e.g. Merging DD´s)? • XML (through Access tool) and excel reporting

  4. Session 2 – WISE SoE TCM data processing and quality issues Summary

  5. Session 2 – Main discussion points Hazardous substances • Dry/wet weight • warning about missing information are given when submitted to ICES (May not be used in assessments) • can a similar warning be given for ICES data used by Eionet? • Specification factsheet with details on data specification (see EEA website) • Coordinate ICES & Eionet station dictionary • National overview of changes in station ID • NRC to provide list linking ICES / WFD / Eionet stations to EEA and documenting changes. • Refer to 3 excel lists in Meeting Folder • Important to coordinate & streamline with Black Sea Commission (station names, aggregation methods, assessment levels)

  6. Session 2 – Main discussion points • (Non)reporting duplicates is clear for most countries • DE, PL, LT, IE, BE report part of date to ICES/ Eionet • SI reports 5 stations to both Eionet & UNEP/MAP • FR to check how reporting to OSPAR, UNEP/MAP, Eionet is structured • To send action list & deadline after meeting • including links to (downloadable) specification sheet • EEA/ETC to prepare ASAP country-specific station lists (WFD/ICES/Eionet) and kml files • Proposals on methodological changes to be communicated and consulted with RSCs & countries. These changes are also relevant to the work of data managers.

More Related