Slide1 l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 37

Lecture 4 Sequence alignment and searching PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 159 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Lecture 4 Sequence alignment and searching. Sequence alignment. What is the purpose of sequence alignment?. Identification of homology and homologous sites in related sequences Inference of evolutionary history that lead to the differences in observed sequences.

Download Presentation

Lecture 4 Sequence alignment and searching

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Slide1 l.jpg

Lecture 4

Sequence alignment and searching


Slide2 l.jpg

Sequence alignment


What is the purpose of sequence alignment l.jpg

What is the purpose of sequence alignment?

  • Identification of homology and homologous sites in related sequences

  • Inference of evolutionary history that lead to the differences in observed sequences


Types of comparisons and alignment methods l.jpg

Types of comparisons and alignment methods

According to sequence

Coverage:

According to number od sequences:


Introduction to sequence alignment l.jpg

Introduction to sequence alignment

For the sequences gctgaacg and ctataatc:

An uninformative alignment:

-------gctgaacg

ctataatc-------

An alignment without gaps

gctgaacg

ctataatc

An alignment with gaps

gctga-a--cg

--ct-ataatc

And another

gctg-aa-cg

-ctataatc-

Given two text strings:

First string = a b c d e

Second string = a c d e f

a reasonable alignment would be

a b c d e -

a - c d e f

We must choose criteria so that algorithm can choose the best alignment.

Source: Lesk,Introduction to Bioinformatics


The dotplot 1 l.jpg

The dotplot (1)

  • A simple picture that gives an overview of the similarities between two sequences

  • Dotplot showing identities between short name (DOROTHYHODGKIN) and full name (DOROTHYCROWFOOTHODGKIN)of a famous protein crystallographer:

Letters corresponding to isolated matches are shown in non-bold type. The longest matching regions, shown inboldface, are the first and last names DOROTHY and HODGKIN. Shorter matching regions, such as the OTH ofdorOTHy and crowfoOTHodgkin, or the RO of doROthy and cROwfoot, are noise.

Source: Lesk,Introduction to Bioinformatics


The dotplot 2 l.jpg

The dotplot (2)

Dotplot showing identities between a repetitive sequence (ABRACADABRACADABRA) and itself. The repeats appear on several subsidiary diagonals parallel to the main diagonal.

Source: Lesk,Introduction to Bioinformatics


The dotplot 3 l.jpg

The dotplot (3)

Dotplot showing identities between the palindromic sequence MAX I STAY AWAY AT SIX AM and itself. Thepalindrome reveals itself as a stretch of matches perpendicular to the main diagonal.

Source: Lesk,Introduction to Bioinformatics


The dotplot 4 l.jpg

The dotplot (4)

Source: Lesk,Introduction to Bioinformatics


Dotplots and sequence alignments l.jpg

Dotplots and sequence alignments

Any path through the dotplot from upper left to lower right passes through a succession of cells, eachof which picks out a pair of positions, one from the row and one from the column, that correspond in the alignment; or that indicates a gap in one of the sequences. The path need not pass through filled-in points only. However, themore filled-in points on the diagonal segments of the path, the more matching residues in the alignment.

Corrseponding alignment:

DOROTHY--------HODGKIN

DOROTHYCROWFOOTHODGKIN

Source: Lesk,Introduction to Bioinformatics


Measures of sequence similarity l.jpg

Measures of sequence similarity

  • Two measures of distance between two character strings:

    • The Hamming distance, defined between two strings of equal length, is the number of positions withmismatching characters.

    • The Levenshtein, or edit distance, between two strings of not necessarily equal length, is the minimalnumber of 'edit operations' required to change one string into the other, where an edit operation is a deletion,insertion or alteration of a single character in either sequence. A given sequence of edit operations induces aunique alignment, but not vice versa.

      agtc

      cgta Hamming distance = 2

      ag-tcc

      cgctca Levenshtein distance =3

Source: Lesk,Introduction to Bioinformatics


Scoring schemes l.jpg

Scoring schemes

  • In molecular biology, certain changes are more likely to occur than others

    • Amino acid substitutions tend to be conservative

    • In nucleotide sequences, transitions are more frequent than transversions

  • -> We want to give different weights to different edit operations

  • Hamming and Lenenshtein distance are measues of dissimilarity. In MB it is more common to measure similarity (higher similarity = higher score)

  • Example: a DNA substitution matrix:

a g c t

a 20 10 5 5

g 10 20 5 5

c 5 5 20 10

t 5 5 10 20

Source: Lesk,Introduction to Bioinformatics


Derivation of substitution matrices l.jpg

Derivation of substitution matrices

Start frequencies for

a genetic matrix

(upper triangular matrix)

Expected number of random mutation events

Start frequencies for

PAM matrices

(lower triangular matrix)

Observed number of substitutions


Pam matrices l.jpg

PAM Matrices

  • First substitution matrices widely used

  • Based on the point-accepted-mutation (PAM) model of evolution (Dayhoff, 1978)

  • PAMs are relative measures of evolutionary distance

    • 1 PAM = 1 accepted mutation per 100 AAs

    • Does not mean that after 100 PAMs every AA will be different? Why or why not?

To view and compare different substitution matrices, visit

http://eta.embl-heidelberg.de:8000/misc/mat/


Pam matrices15 l.jpg

PAM Matrices

  • Derived from global alignments of closely related sequences.

  • Matrices for greater evolutionary distances are extrapolated from those for lesser ones.

  • The number with the matrix (PAM40, PAM100) refers to the evolutionary distance; greater numbers are greater distances.

  • Does not take into account different evolutionary rates between conserved and non-conserved regions.


Blosum matrices l.jpg

BLOSUM Matrices

  • Henikoff, S. & Henikoff J.G. (1992)

  • Use blocks of protein sequence fragments from different families (the BLOCKS database)

  • Amino acid pair frequencies calculated by summing over all possible pairs in block

  • Different evolutionary distances are incorporated into this scheme with a clustering procedure (identity over particular threshold = same cluster)

  • Similar idea to PAM matrices

  • Probabilities estimated from blocks of sequence fragments

  • Blocks represent structurally conserved regions


Blosum matrices17 l.jpg

BLOSUM Matrices

  • Target frequencies are identified directly instead of extrapolation.

  • Sequences more than x% identitical within the block where substitutions are being counted, are grouped together and treated as a single sequence

    • BLOSUM 50 : >= 50% identity

    • BLOSUM 62 : >= 62 % identity

To view and compare different substitution matrices, visit

http://eta.embl-heidelberg.de:8000/misc/mat/


Blosum matrices18 l.jpg

BLOSUM Matrices

  • Derived from local, ungapped alignments of distantly related sequences

  • All matrices are directly calculated; no extrapolations are used – no explicit model

  • The number after the matrix (BLOSUM62) refers to the minimum percent identity of the blocks used to construct the matrix; greater numbers are lesser distances.

  • The BLOSUM series of matrices generally perform better than PAM matrices for local similarity searches (Proteins 17:49).


How do you prefer it done right or done fast l.jpg

How do you prefer it: done right or done fast?

  • Exact methods - the result is guaranteed to be (mathematically) optimal

    • Pairwise alignment

      • Needleman-Wunsch (global)

      • Smith-Waterman (local)

    • Multiple alignment

      • Rarely used; quickly becomes computationally intractable with increasing number of sequences and/or their length

  • Heuristic methods: make some assumptions that hold most, but not all of the time

    • Pairwise alignment – BLAST

    • Multiple alignment – all widely used multiple alignment programs (ClustalW, TCofee…)


Exact pairwise methods dynamic programming l.jpg

Exact pairwise methods: Dynamic programming

Equivalence matrix

Cumulative matrix

(can be computed from C-or N-terminus)

An example of a cumulative matrix (computed from C-terminus) with traces of possible alignments)


What does it mean l.jpg

What does it mean?

Principle of reduction of number of paths that need to be examined:

If a path from X->Z passes through Y, the best path from X->Y is independent of the best path from Y->Z

Source: Lesk,Introduction to Bioinformatics


Blast the workhorse of bioinformatcs http www ncbi nlm nih gov blast l.jpg

BLAST = Basic local alignment search tool

When you have a nucleotide or protein sequence that you want to search against sequence databases

to determine what the sequence is

to find related sequences (homologs)

Bioinformatics researchers use standalone version of BLAST, run from the command line or other programs

BLAST – the workhorse of bioinformatcshttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST


Different blast programs l.jpg

Different BLAST programs


Blast algorithm principles l.jpg

BLAST algorithm principles

(Basic Local Alignment Search Tool)

Main idea:

  • Construct a dictionary of all the words in the query

  • Initiate a local alignment for each word match between query and DB

    Running Time: O(MN)

    However, orders of magnitude faster than Smith-Waterman

query

DB


Blast original version l.jpg

BLAST  Original Version

……

query

Dictionary:

All words of length k (~11)

Alignment initiated between words of alignment score  T

(typically T = k)

Alignment:

Ungapped extensions until score

below statistical threshold

Output:

All local alignments with score

> statistical threshold

……

scan

DB

query


Blast original version26 l.jpg

BLAST  Original Version

A C G A A G T A A G G T C C A G T

Example:

k = 4,

T = 4

The matching word GGTC initiates an alignment

Extension to the left and right with no gaps until alignment falls < 50%

Output:

GTAAGGTCC

GTTAGGTCC

C C C T T C C T G G A T T G C G A


Gapped blast l.jpg

Gapped BLAST

A C G A A G T A A G G T C C A G T

Added features:

  • Pairs of words can initiate alignment

  • Extensions with gaps in a band around anchor

    Output:

    GTAAGGTCCAGT

    GTTAGGTC-AGT

C T G A T C C T G G A T T G C G A


Gapped blast28 l.jpg

Gapped BLAST

A C G A A G T A A G G T C C A G T

Added features:

  • Pairs of words can initiate alignment

  • Nearby alignments are merged

  • Extensions with gaps until score < T below best score so far

    Output:

    GTAAGGTCCAGT

    GTTAGGTC-AGT

C T G A T C C T G G A T T G C G A


Blast example of sequence search l.jpg

BLAST: Example of sequence search

Query sequence or accession number

Sequence database to search


Blast example of sequence search30 l.jpg

BLAST: Example of sequence search

Please come back later 


Blast results list of hits l.jpg

BLAST results: List of hits

E–value - number of unrelated databank sequences expected to yield same or higher score by pure chance


Blast results high scoring pairs hsps l.jpg

BLAST results: High scoring pairs (HSPs)

Fundamental unit of the BLAST algorithm output

HSP (high scoring pair)

Aligned fragments of query and detected sequence with similarity score exceeding a set cutoff value

E-value (Expectation)

Score = 61 (27.8 bits), Expect = 1.8e-65, Sum P(4) = 1.8e-65 Identities = 10/17 (58%), Positives = 16/17 (94%)

Query: 81 SGDLSMLVLLPDEVSDL 97

+GD+SM +LLPDE++D+

Sbjct:259 AGDVSMFLLLPDEIADV 275

HSP


Blast confidence measures l.jpg

BLAST Confidence measures

Score and bit-score :depend on scoring method

E-value (Expect value) : number of unrelated database sequences expected to yield same or higher score by pure chance

P-value (Probability): probability that database yields by pure chanceat least one alignment with same or higer score

The Expect value (E) is a parameter that describes the number of hits one can "expect" to see just by chance when searching a database of a particular size. It decreases exponentially with the Score (S) that is assigned to a match between two sequences. Essentially, the E value describes the random background noise that exists for matches between sequences.

The Expect value is used as a convenient way to create a significance threshold for reporting results. When the Expect value is increased from the default value of 10, a larger list with more low-scoring hits can be reported. (E-value approching zero => significant alignment. Less than 0,01 = almost always found to be homologous; 1e-10 for nucleotide searches of 1e-4 for protein searches= frequently related)

In BLAST 2.0, the Expect value is also used instead of the P value (probability) to report the significance of matches. For example, an E value of 1 assigned to a hit can be interpreted as meaning that in a database of the current size one might expect to see 1 match with a similar score simply by chance.


Be careful when comparing e or p values from different searches l.jpg

Be careful when comparing E- or P-values from different searches

Comparison is only meaningful for different query sequences searched agains the same database with the same BLAST parameters


Variants of blast l.jpg

Variants of BLAST

  • MEGABLAST:

    • Optimized to align very similar sequences

      • Works best when k = 4i  16

      • Linear gap penalty

  • PSI-BLAST:

    • BLAST produces many hits

    • Those are aligned, and a pattern is extracted

    • Pattern is used for next search; above steps iterated

  • WU-BLAST: (Washington University BLAST)

    • Optimized, added features

  • BlastZ

    • Combines BLAST/PatternHunter methodology

    • Good for local alignments of non-coding (regulatory) regions


Important when not to use blast l.jpg

IMPORTANT: When NOT to use BLAST

  • A typical situation: you have a piece of human DNA sequence and want to extend it or find what gene it belongs to.

  • In other words, you want an exact or near-exact match to a sequence that is part of an assembled genome.

  • Genome browsers are equipped with very fast algorithms for finding near-exact matches in genomic sequences:

    • BLAT (with UCSC Genome Browser)

      • Highly recommended: the BLAT paper (Kent WJ (2003) Genome Res 12:656-64) - it is famous for its unorthodox writing style 

    • SSAHA (with Ensembl)


Blat blast like alignment tool l.jpg

BLAT: BLAST-like alignment tool

  • Differences with respect to BLAST:

  • Dictionary of the DB (BLAST: query)

  • Initiate alignment on any # of matching hits (BLAST: 1 or 2 hits)

  • More aggressive stitching-together of alignments

  • Special code to align mature mRNA to DNA

  • Result: very efficient for:

    • Aligning many sequences to a DB

    • Aligning two genomes


  • Login