1 / 7

ROOT and statistics tutorial Exercise: Discover the Higgs, part 2

ROOT and statistics tutorial Exercise: Discover the Higgs, part 2. Attilio Andreazza Università di Milano and INFN Caterina Doglioni Université de Genève. Outline. What will we do today : Discover the Higgs boson of course ! ... well , check ATLAS is not cheating us 

eunice
Download Presentation

ROOT and statistics tutorial Exercise: Discover the Higgs, part 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ROOT and statistics tutorialExercise: Discover the Higgs, part 2 Attilio Andreazza Università di Milano and INFN CaterinaDoglioni Université de Genève

  2. Outline • Whatwillwe do today: • Discover the Higgsboson of course! ...well, check ATLAS isnotcheatingus • Whatwewilllearn! • Computing confidencelevelsbased on Poissonianstatistics. • Compute confidencelevelsbasedif the expectedm(B,S)isuncertain. • For peoplerunning fast: • Expected 95% levelexclusion + errorbars 2011+2012 data In the region 125 ± 5 GeV Dataset 2011 2012 2011+2012 Expected B only 2±0.3 3±0.4 5.1±0.8 Expected S mH=125 GeV2±0.3 3±0.5 5.3±0.8 Observed in the data 4 9 13 From F. Gianotti’sHiggs seminar Root and statistics tutorial: Exercises

  3. Confidenceleveldefinition • Definition of confidencelevel • N.B.:thisisthe frequentistdefinition, not the Bayesianone from the lectures, butthatallowsyou to makeallcomputations by yourself and to grasp the mainfeatures of the problem. • A certaincriterionrejects an hypothesis with C.L. aif, in case the hypothesisistrue, itwould be erroneouslyrejected by thatcriterion on a fraction 1-a of the cases. • In ourexercise: • Weobserve a certainnumber of eventsNobs • Weexpecta certainnumber of background events:NB • Discovery: wereject the hypothesisour sample containsonlybackground eventsif: • Exclusion:wereject an hypothesisexpectingNSsignaleventsif: Root and statistics tutorial: Exercises

  4. Confidencelevelcomputation • At first just assume a Poissonstatistics: • We can compute the probabilitysumming the probabilities of allN up to Nobs • Butwewant to use a Monte Carlo method!Why? Itwill be easier to extend to the treatment of systematicuncertainties (thisiswhat BAT or RooStats do for example). • What to do: • Sample the probabilitydistribution M times (say M=10000) • Counthowmanycases M’ the value of Nexceeds (or islowerthan, ifappopriated) Nobs. • We can reject the hypothesisif M’/M<1-a. • Somethinglike: Int_t M=0; for (Int_t i=0; i<10000; i++) { Int_tN = gen.Poisson(NB); if ( N>=Nobs ) M++; } Double_t CL = 1.-M/10000. Root and statistics tutorial: Exercises

  5. Computing confidencelevels • Neglectinguncertainties on NB • With which CL can wereject the background-onlyhypothesiswhenusing: • Only 2011 data • Only 2012 data • The combined set • Ifonewouldhavebeenobservedonly the expectedbackgroun (i.e. Nobs =2,3 and 5 eventsrespectively for 2011, 2012 and combineddataset), with whichconfidencelevelonewouldhaverejected the hypothesis of the Higgspresence? • Repeatadding the uncertainty on the mvalue of the Poissondistribution. Assume the uncertainties on NB and NS are fullycorrelated. • In such a situation and the integral can be performed by samplingNB from a Gaussiandistribution and afterwardsamplingN. Root and statistics tutorial: Exercises

  6. Computing exclusionlimit • Observedexclusionlimit: • aftergettingNobsevents, allNS>N0,S are excludedatconfidencelevela, whereis the N0,S minimum onesatisfying the relation: • Determiningthis minimum, even in thissimple case isquitecomputationallyexpensive, and special tools are usuallyemployed. • Expectedexclusionlimit: • Is the onethatwouldobtainedifNobswouldcorrespond to the median of • The ±1sexpectedvaluescorrespond to the limitthatwould be obtainedifNobswouldcoincide with the 16% and 84% percentiles of • The ±1sexpectedvaluescorrespond to the limitthatwould be obtainedifNobswould coincide with the 2.25% and 97.75% percentiles of • Compute the expectedlimits for ATLAS and mH=125 GeV Root and statistics tutorial: Exercises

  7. 2011 data 2012 data • Repeating the samecalculation for allmHhypothesisis the way the famous band plots are produced. • From F. Gianotti’sHiggs seminar Excluded (95% CL): 131-162, 170-460 GeV Expected: 124-164, 176-500 GeV Excluded (95% CL): 130-170 GeV Expected: xxxxGeV 2011+2012 data

More Related