Physical strain: pregnancy outcome and fertility - Marja-Liisa LindbohmFinn...
Potential effects of physical strain. Pronounced physical exertion mayalter hormonal balanceincrease intraabdominal pressuredecrease uterine blood flowaffect nutritional status. Measures of physical work load in occupational reproductive studies. Single factorsHeavy lifting and load carryingPr
Physical strain: pregnancy outcome and fertility
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only and may not be sold or licensed nor shared on other sites. SlideServe reserves the right to change this policy at anytime.
While downloading, If for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Physical strain: pregnancy outcome and fertility
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Potential effects of physical strain
Pronounced physical exertion may
alter hormonal balance increase intraabdominal pressure decrease uterine blood flow affect nutritional status Measures of physical work load in occupational reproductive studies Single factors Heavy lifting and load carrying Prolonged standing and/or walking Bending and reaching Integrated measures Energy expenditure, work intensity Biomechanical load Fatigue score Surrogate measures: job title, work duties Working conditions and risk of preterm birth: a meta-analysis (Mozurkewich et al 2000) Physically demanding work and adverse pregnancy outcome (Mozurkewich et al 2000) Standing, lifting and having small-for-gestational-age infant (Fortier et al 1995) Lifting, hectic work pace and pre-eclampsia (Wergeland et al 1997) Prolonged standing and spontaneous abortion Inconsistent results on the effects of standing at work on the risk of spontaneous abortion In two studies an increased risk for standing at work >8 hours/day was observed, but only in women who had a history of previous fetal loss Cervical incompetence or other anatomical abnormalities or weakness may predispose these women to the effects of standing Job strain and fertility (Hjollund et al 1998 and 2004) A follow-up study on couples trying to become pregnant Job strain, defined as high job demands and low job control, had no substantial detrimental effect on fertility among women Analysis restricted to couples with no suspected competitive causes of reduced fertility showed reduced fertility in women with high-strain jobs No association found between any semen characteristics or sexual hormones and job strain EU guidelines on movements and postures (COM(2000) 466 final/2)
Pregnant workers should not be exposed to
manual handling involving risk of injury awkward movements and postures, especially in confined spaces work at heights long periods spent handling loads, or standing or sitting without regular exercise or movement to maintain healthy circulation Guidelines on lifting weights (Denmark)(AT-anvisning Nr. 188.8.131.52, 1998) Manual handling of heavy loads may pose a risk to pregnancy If the load weights more than 10-12 kg there should be a break between each lift and the total of lifted weights should not exceed 1000 kg during a day From the beginning of the 7th month of pregnancy the weight of the lifted loads should be halved because of increasing lifting distance Shift work and spontaneous abortion among midwives (Axelsson et al 1996) Shift or night work and preterm birth: a meta-analysis (Mozurkewich et al 2000) Six studies published in 1987 – 1998 Pooled odds ratio 1.24 (95% CI 1.06 – 1.46) Analysis of three high-quality studies revealed also a weak association (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00 – 1.47) Conclusion: shift and night work may increase the risk of preterm birth Shift work and fetal growth retardation Inconsistent results on the effects of shift work Elevated risk of giving birth to SGA babies among mothers in shift work (Nurminen et al 1989) Elevated risk of having a baby with low birth weight (<2500 g) among midwives in night work (Bodin et al 1999) No excess of fetal growth retardation related to shift work or to evening or night work only (Fortier et al 1995) Council Directive 92/85/EEC: night work Member States shall take necessary measures to ensure that a worker is not obliged to perform night work during her pregnancy and for a period following childbirth A medical certificate stating that this is necessary for the safety or health of the worker is needed Measures must entail the possibility of transfer to daytime work or leave from work or extension of maternity leave where such a transfer is not feasible EU Guidelines on fatigue and working hours (COM(2000) 466 final/2) Because of increasing tiredness, some pregnant women may not be able to work irregular or late shifts, night work or overtime Not all women are affected in the same way; the risks vary with the type of work and the individual It may be necessary to adjust working hours temporarily, including the timing and frequency of rest breaks, and to change shift patterns and duration to avoid risks Noise and adverse pregnancy outcome Noise may increase maternal catecholamine secretion, which may further stimulate or retard uterine contractions and affect uteroplacental blood flow Noise exposure of 85dBL has been associated with fetal growth retardation An excess of hormonal disturbances, infertility and spontaneous abortion also reported EU Guidelines: pregnant workers should not be exposed to noise levels exceeding national limit values EU Guidelines on some physical agents (COM(2000) 466 final/2)
Pregnant workers should not
be exposed to prolonged excessive heat or cold work in a high-pressure atmosphere or dive be exposed to unpleasant vibration of the entire body, particularly at low frequencies be exposed to work entailing shaking, shocks or where jolts or blows are delivered to the lower body References on physical strain, shift work and reproductive health Mozurkewich EL, Luke B, Avni M, Wolf FM. Working conditions and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:623-635. Nurminen T. Shift work and reproductive health. Scand J Work Environ Health 1998;24:28-34. Ahlborg G. Physical work load and pregnancy outcome. J Occup Environ Med 1995;37:941-944.