1 / 46

Unstructured grids for Astrophysics Gas dynamics and radiative transfer

Unstructured grids for Astrophysics Gas dynamics and radiative transfer. C.P. Dullemond Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Heidelberg, Germany. Overview. Radiative transfer (RT) in astrophysics: Small introduction to the physics of radiative transfer

eris
Download Presentation

Unstructured grids for Astrophysics Gas dynamics and radiative transfer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Unstructured grids for Astrophysics Gas dynamics and radiative transfer C.P. Dullemond Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Heidelberg, Germany

  2. Overview • Radiative transfer (RT) in astrophysics: • Small introduction to the physics of radiative transfer • Example of protoplanetary disks: how to link theory to observations. • Future of RT in astrophysics:complex geometries • Examples • Current techniques: Adaptive Mesh Refinement • Future techniques: Unstructured grids • Examples • My new all-round astro RT package: RADMC-3D • Need CG library for unstructured grids

  3. Radiative transfer Radiative transfer equation: Over length scales larger than 1/ intensity I tends to approach source function S. Photon mean free path: Optical depth of a cloud of size L: In case of local thermodynamic equilibrium: S is Planck function:

  4. Radiative transfer

  5. Difficulty of dust radiative transfer • If temperature of dust is given (ignoring scattering for the moment), then radiative transfer is a mere integral along a ray: i.e. easy. • Problem: dust temperature is affected by radiation, even the radiation it emits itself. • Therefore: must solve radiative transfer and thermal balance simultaneously. • Difficulty: each point in cloud can heat (and receive heat from) each other point.

  6. Example: Studying Planetary Birthplaces the so called “Protoplanetary Disks”

  7. Here is the star hidden = 500x Distance Earth-Sun = 16x Distance Neptune-Sonne Planetary birth site in the Orion Nebula Hubble Space Telescope Image

  8. z R Hydrostatic equilibrium: Disk structure 1 AU 10 AU 100 AU Need temperature!

  9. z R Moving radiation through matter: Interaction radiation - matter: Disk structure 1 AU Radiative transfer 10 AU 100 AU

  10. HD163296 “Virtual Telescope” Model: Observations:

  11. Example: Infrared spectra of disks Dust continuum spectra of a number of protoplanetary disks Furlan et al. 2006

  12. Example: Infrared spectra of disks Gas (CO) emission lines from a protoplanetary disk Goto, Dullemond et al. 2008

  13. Radiative transfer Emission/absorption lines: Hot surface layer Cool surface layer Flux Flux  

  14. Disk has hot translucent surface layer

  15. Viewing a protoplanetary disk

  16. Viewing a protoplanetary disk

  17. But Nature is not smooth or axisymmetric...

  18. Disks are clumpy / spiraly / asymmetric AB Aurigae: a proto- planetary disk Fukagawa et al. 2004

  19. Complex geometries, huge size ranges Eagle Nebula (M16) Picture credit: T.A. Rector & B.A. Wolpa

  20. Complex geometries, huge size ranges Eagle Nebula (M16) Picture Credit: J. Hester & P. Scowen

  21. Complex geometries, huge size ranges Eagle Nebula (M16) Picture Credit: J. Hester & P. Scowen

  22. size of our solar system Complex geometries, huge size ranges Eagle Nebula (M16) Picture Credit: J. Hester & P. Scowen

  23. Formation of stars By Matthew Bate Uni Exeter, UK

  24. Formation of planets: clumps, waves Rice, Lodato et al. 2004

  25. Bottom lines... • Modern astrophysical simulations are evolving more and more to full 3-D • Such models often cover huge ranges of scales: • Star formation: from parsec to solar radius = 108 • Planet formation: from 10 AU to Earth radius = 105 • Galaxy formation: from kilopc to central BH = 1012 • etc. • Grid refinement essential. Currently usually AMR type. • Unstructured grids may (will) revolutionize this field.

  26. Current methods: Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR)

  27. Current methods: AMR Paramesh library

  28. Can zoom in arbitrarily much... Abel, Bryan and Norman 1999

  29. Problems • Preferential directions, may lead to artificial effects • No Galilei-invariance • Jump-like transitions at refinement boundaries may cause problems • Moving objects require continuous de-refinement and refinement • Hierarchical oct-tree structure can be cumbersome to handle for the user

  30. Unstructured grids are now slowly being recognized in the astrophysical community

  31. A new hydro scheme (by Volker Springel) Code is called “Arepo”, author V. Springel (MPA Garching, Germany) Paper in prep. Uses Voronoi diagram for grid. Nice feature: Cells automatically adapt to problem.

  32. A new hydro scheme (by Volker Springel) Code is called “Arepo”, author V. Springel (MPA Garching, Germany) Paper in prep. Uses Voronoi diagram for grid. Nice feature: Cells automatically adapt to problem.

  33. Delaunay grids for radiative transfer Model of a protoplanetary disk by Christian Brinch (Leiden University, the Netherlands)

  34. RADMC-3D A new 3-D versatile radiative transfer package for astrophysics (in progress) based on 2-D code RADMC

  35. RADMC-3D: Features • Continuum and gas line transfer • 1-D, 2-D and 3-D models • Cartesian or spherical coordinates • Various gridding possibilities: • Regular • Regular + AMR • Tetrahedral / Delaunay • Voronoi

  36. Example Simple model of star formation

  37. Example Simple model of star formation

  38. Synthetic observations λ=1000 μm

  39. Synthetic observations λ=100 μm

  40. Synthetic observations λ=50 μm

  41. Synthetic observations λ=40 μm

  42. Synthetic observations λ=30 μm

  43. Synthetic observations λ=20 μm

  44. Synthetic observations λ=10 μm

  45. Conclusions • 3-D complex models are more and more common in astrophysics. • AMR currently the standard, but has problems • In spite of their seeming complexity, unstructured grids may actually be easier than AMR-like techniques, provided a good library for such gridding is used. • Unstructured grids now slowly start being used in mainstream RT software (though still very much in its infancy)

  46. Wish list • Periodic spaces • Incremental updates, if faster than redoing • Implementation on GPUs, if this brings speedup

More Related