1 / 12

Third-Generation Database System manifesto

Third-Generation Database System manifesto. The committee for advanced Database Management System (DBMS) Function. Question:. What is the path we must follow to arrive at the next generation of DBMS?. Current state description from authors (1990). Mainly 2 nd generation DBMS

ericgraves
Download Presentation

Third-Generation Database System manifesto

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Third-Generation Database System manifesto The committee for advanced Database Management System (DBMS) Function

  2. Question: What is the path we must follow to arrive at the next generation of DBMS?

  3. Current state description from authors (1990) • Mainly 2nd generation DBMS • Agreement in industry that the current DBMS need extended capabilities. • There is a need for getting the common understanding of where we are going down on the paper. • A counterweight to the spreading object-oriented enthusiasm is needed.

  4. What is needed: A gradual transition from 2nd generation DBMS to a 3rd generation DBMS

  5. First Tenet Besides traditional database management services, third generation DBMSs will provide support for richer object structures and rules

  6. Second Tenet Third generation DBMSs must subsume second generation DBMS.

  7. Third Tenet Third generation DBMSs must be open to other subsystems.

  8. (1. Tenet)Object and Rule Management • A rich type system is needed (including extensions to query language). • (Multiple- ) Inheritance is a good idea. • Functions, including database procedures and methods, and encapsulation are a good idea. • Unique IDs should only be reassigned if human defined primary key is not available. • Rules are important.

  9. (2. Tenet) Increasing DBMS Function • Programmatic access should be through a non-procedural high-level access language (minimal navigation). • Collections should be definable both through member enumeration and through queries (extensionally vs. intentionally). • Updatable views are essential. • Performance indicators must not appear in data models.

  10. (3. Tenet)Need for an open system. • DBMSs must be accessible through multiple higher level languages. • Persistent objects is a good idea. • SQL will prevail. • Queries and result set should be the lowest level of communication.

  11. Needed improvements in current DBMS to become 3rd generation DBMS • Improvements in relational databases systems: inheritance and additional type constructors. • Improvements in object-oriented database systems: query language, query optimizers, views and SQL support. • Both database systems need support for persistent programming languages.

  12. Conclusion • Object-oriented databases is not the solution to the challenges found in using 2nd generation DBMSs. • The existing experience and expertise built into the existing relational databases should be used as much as possible. • Development based on the current 2nd generation DBMS is more sensible than new development from scratch.

More Related