1 / 29

ITM 734

ITM 734. Human Factors in Information Systems Ch. 6: Long Term Memory Fall 2005 Cindy Corritore, Ph.D. Creighton University. LTM characteristics. Slow but variable access speed Permanent (little decay) Infinite capacity Retrieval depends on ….

enid
Download Presentation

ITM 734

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ITM 734 Human Factors in Information Systems Ch. 6: Long Term Memory Fall 2005 Cindy Corritore, Ph.D. Creighton University corritore, 734

  2. LTM characteristics • Slow but variable access speed • Permanent (little decay) • Infinite capacity • Retrieval depends on …. • recency, expectations, similarity of information, connectedness, rehearsal, etc. C.L. Corritore

  3. Types of LTM • Explicit and implicit • conscious recollection, top-down retrieval from multiple systems with massive integration (E) • unconscious recollection, bottom-up from single system (I) – more automatic C.L. Corritore

  4. Types of LTM • Episodic and semantic • self-awareness component, things that happen to you, complex (E) • stuff we know, knowledge about the world, relationships, implicit - dictionary, thesaurus • likely stored the same way C.L. Corritore

  5. Types of LTM • Declarative and procedural • knowing that, explicit primarily, relationships, integration of information (D) – knowing things and their relationships • knowing how, mostly implicit, not relational – how to do things C.L. Corritore

  6. Memory structures for stories, events … • Schema - framework that includes frames & scripts • become chunks for expanding memory • basis for expectations • What is Bartlett’s Schema Theory? • framework for stories that affects comprehension • told American Indian stories, then recall - • readjusted story elements and themes to fit their model • laundry context (p 215) - calls up proper schema, fill in the blanks, departures from normal • Helps make it easier to recall, group information • Experts have great, robust schema • Theory to explain why recall unusual/unique things better? C.L. Corritore

  7. Everyday memory • little studied • appears to have a lot of variability • eyewitness memory • flashbulb memory C.L. Corritore

  8. Eye-witness memory • Effects • post-event memory - questioning right after the fact can distort (retroactive interference) • verbal overshadowing - talking about it right after happens over-writes visual memory • memory in the world sketchy (Normal) • weapon focus • confirmation bias - affected by what you expect C.L. Corritore

  9. Flash bulb memory • what were you doing when heard about 911 disaster? • Why is this theory felt to be inaccurate? • not consistently or regularly found • Richness ….. C.L. Corritore

  10. Ericsson and Kintsch LT-WM • postulate using LTM as sort of working memory (STM) in areas of expertise • able to use LTM for reliable storage and build fast retrieval cues for fast recall • use it like an extension of STM • must be able to store into LTM very quickly (learned skill for a narrow domain) • must be well-known so expert can anticipate degree to which item will need to be recalled • selective storage • associate info with retrieval cue (part of a retrieval structure) • so can go straight to the item • STM only has to hold one node of the structure C.L. Corritore

  11. LTM processes • Storage • rehearsal • Retrieval • Forgetting • Recognition vs recall • Frequency and recency effects C.L. Corritore

  12. Storage- Rehearsal • Memorization involves storing the information and one or more access paths • Good memories are rich semantic networks with many (unique) access paths • Learning is aided by meaningfulness, structure, familiarity and concreteness • Active memorizing requires effort, motivation • Passive memorizing - unpredictable, often episodic, context sensitive • Similar items interfere if they are not separated during memorizing - learning transfer effects - old interfere with new; new overwrite old C.L. Corritore

  13. Facilitating Memorization • Structure information to help chunking - use categories, ordering, associations • Encourage reasoning during memorizing - active memory • Help access by multiple pathways - memorizing tricks e.g. keywords, cognitive aids, mnemonics, link to image memory (rooms) • Make associations clear and keep them consistent C.L. Corritore

  14. Facilitating Memorization • Make separate and recognizable contexts for recall - important for script / skill memory • Increase depth of encoding • Richness • Visualization • Uniqueness • Interaction Old chinese proverb: • Recognition C.L. Corritore

  15. Visualization & memory example improve your memory exercise – memory pegs 1 bun 6 sticks 2 shoe 7 heaven 3 tree 8 gate 4 door 9 wine 5 hive 10 hen Dix et al. C.L. Corritore

  16. Facilitating Memorization: Mnemonics • cognitive mnemonics • ABC’s with tune • on old olympus mountain tops a finn and german viewed some hops (12 crainial nerves: OOOMTAFAGVSH) • seems to be more to remember? C.L. Corritore

  17. Facilitating Memorization: Mnemonics • check out: http://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/cognition/tutorials/index.html • mnemonic for Norman principles: visibility, feedback, cognitive model, affordance, mapping My fat cat ate veggies C.L. Corritore

  18. Retrieval - Theories of forgetting • repression (Freud) - bad experience • interference (proactive or retroactive) • previous learning/memories interrupt • espc if similar stimuli – belong to same category • eye-witness and post-incident questioning • doesn’t explain how it works • cue-dependant • forget because info not there anymore or *can’t access it • encoding specificity principle (cue-dependant) • retrieval a func. of overlap between information present at retrieval and info stored in memory • includes contextual info • Recognition dependant on internal cues only (not external context) C.L. Corritore

  19. Recall vs. recognition • Knowledge in the World Theory is GUI’s - Alan Kay developed in 1960’s • Steve Jobs in late 1970’s from Xerox Parc • keep knowledge in world to supplement head knowledge • recall vs. recognition • remember just enough detail to get by • exceptions rather then norms • experts not expert in knowledge in the head as much as expert in how to locate needed knowledge in the world C.L. Corritore

  20. Design implications • Reduce cognitive load!!! • Type of user • novice, expert, intermittent user C.L. Corritore

  21. Design implications • Mental models natural extensions of schema - support schemas • metaphors - desktop/office • match system information structure with familiar memory structures so user can use their schema C.L. Corritore

  22. Design implications • Design interfaces that help users ‘grow’ good mental models • meaningful and familiar command names (eg. from task world) • balance this with existing conceptual models of item names (ie. cut, copy) • Incorporate closure (finish) on tasks • helps build mental model • helps identify chunks for memory when become an expert • Consistency - to build mental model; don’t have to remember as much C.L. Corritore

  23. Design implications • Rich encoding - • multimedia • interaction • context? • May just be to ‘remember your site’ • http://www.pulse3d.com/pulse/ • http://www.jordans.com/roomplanner.asp C.L. Corritore

  24. Design implications • Focus on recognition rather than recall • interface contains prompts/information • studies on computer experts found they don’t have better recall, but high recognition of what is and isn’t available on interface and where to find it (maps) • GUI’s combination of recognition (menu’s) and recall (quick keys) C.L. Corritore

  25. Design implications • Place the burden of remembering on the machine, not the human • Don’t require user memory (eg. between screens) • Don’t have computer ask for info it can derive C.L. Corritore

  26. Design implications • Design minor messages, alerts, warning to be minimally disruptive • prevent user from forgetting data stored in short term memory C.L. Corritore

  27. readings • Lagerkvist – Mnemonic interfaces • brain map • Fass et al – Messy Desk C.L. Corritore

  28. readings • Attention and memory (last week) • Horvitz et al – Models of Attention • Brudisch et al – Considering Attention • Shell et al – ECSGlasses and Pliances • Vertegaal et al – Attentive Cell Phones • Lewis et al – VisualID’s • Oulasvirta C.L. Corritore

  29. Evaluate these • http://happydeluxe.com/ • http://www.google.com vs http://www.yahoo.com • http://www.northcantonmedical.org/ • http://www.enchantedharp.com/ C.L. Corritore

More Related