Faking it calculating loss in computer crime sentencing l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

Faking It: Calculating Loss in Computer Crime Sentencing PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 116 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Faking It: Calculating Loss in Computer Crime Sentencing. Jennifer S. Granick, Esq. Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society [email protected] 18 U.S.C. 1030. (a)(1) unauthorized access to classified information;

Download Presentation

Faking It: Calculating Loss in Computer Crime Sentencing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Faking it calculating loss in computer crime sentencing l.jpg

Faking It: Calculating Loss in Computer Crime Sentencing

Jennifer S. Granick, Esq.

Stanford Law School

Center for Internet and Society

[email protected]


18 u s c 1030 l.jpg

18 U.S.C. 1030

  • (a)(1) unauthorized access to classified information;

  • (a)(2) unauthorized access and obtaining any information from a protected computer (misdemeanor);

  • (a)(3) access that interferes with the ability to use a government computer;

  • (a)(4) access with the intent to defraud if the intruder obtains anything of value > $5K.

  • (a)(5) transmissions or access that caused damage AND $5K loss or special harm


First l.jpg

First

Incidents that cause measurable pecuniary harm will be prosecuted where incidents that cause more difficult to measure non-pecuniary harm may go unpunished.


Second l.jpg

Second

Victim has tremendous power to affect the prosecution and sentence, independent of anything the offender might do.


Third l.jpg

Third

Losses that the law says we should not count against defendants (forensic investigation, worries about harm to reputation) get counted anyway.


Damage defined l.jpg

Damage Defined

Any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information.

18 USC 1030(e)(8).


Loss defined l.jpg

Loss Defined

Any reasonable cost to any victim, including the cost of responding to an offense, conducting a damage assessment, and restoring the data, program, system, or information to its condition prior to the offense, and any revenue lost, cost incurred, or other consequential damages incurred because of interruption of service. (e)(11)


Special harm l.jpg

Special Harm

The modification or impairment, or potential modification or impairment, of the medical examination, diagnosis, treatment, or care of 1 or more individuals; access that causes physical injury to any person; a threat to public health or safety; or damage affecting a computer system used by or for a government entity in furtherance of the administration of justice, national defense, or national security.


Sentencing loss defined l.jpg

Sentencing Loss Defined

Actual loss includes the following pecuniary harm, regardless of whether such pecuniary harm was reasonably foreseeable: any reasonable cost to any victim, including the cost of responding to an offense, conducting a damage assessment, and restoring the data, program, system, or information to its condition prior to the offense, and any revenue lost, cost incurred, or other damages incurred because of interruption of service. 2B1.1, comment 3AViii


Problems l.jpg

Intangible harm

Incidents vary in severity (socially defined)

Repairing system

No forensics

Court review

Only $$ gets punished

Trivial incidents may cost more (victim defined)

Improving System

Forensic Investigation

Low standard of proof

Problems


Goals of sentencing l.jpg

Goals of Sentencing

  • to provide punishment levels that reflect the seriousness of the offense;

  • to provide fairness in meeting the purposes of sentencing;

  • to provide just punishment;

  • to provide certainty in meeting the purposes of sentencing.


Improvements l.jpg

Improvements

  • Figure out how to value intangible harms.

  • Reach consensus on cognizable losses and depend less on victim assessment.

  • Train responders to distinguish between cognizable and excluded losses.

  • Use a non-monetary measure like # of machines/people affected.

  • Raise standards for fact finding at sentencing.


  • Login