1 / 17

Adaptive Multiple Relay Selection Scheme for Cooperative Wireless Networks

Adaptive Multiple Relay Selection Scheme for Cooperative Wireless Networks. Gayan Amarasuriya , Masoud Ardakani and Chintha Tellambura {amarasur, ardakani, chintha}@ece.ualberta.ca. WCNC 2010. University of Alberta, Canada. Outline:. introduction

elpida
Download Presentation

Adaptive Multiple Relay Selection Scheme for Cooperative Wireless Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adaptive Multiple Relay Selection Scheme forCooperative Wireless Networks Gayan Amarasuriya, Masoud Ardakani and Chintha Tellambura {amarasur, ardakani, chintha}@ece.ualberta.ca WCNC 2010 University of Alberta, Canada

  2. Outline: • introduction • single relay selection, multiple relay selection • motivation • proposed scheme • analysis • numerical results • conclusion

  3. All participate relaying (APR): • all L relays cooperate • simple and efficient • optimal in the sense of diversity and coding gains • needs L+1 orthogonal time-slots •  low spectral-efficiency • low spectral efficiency can be overcome by •  selection a subset of available relays APR [Laneman, 2003]

  4. Single relay selection (SRS): • only one relay cooperates  spectral-efficiency increases • SRS schemes • best SRS [Zhao, 2007]  • best–worst SRS [Bletsas, 2006]  • best–harmonic mean SRS [Bletsas, 2006]  • partial SRS [Sadek, 2006]  SRS

  5. Multiple relay selection (MRS): • more than one relay cooperates  better trade-off between spectral-efficiency and available degree of freedom of the wireless channel • MRS schemes • Optimal MRS for orthogonal channels - • [Michalopoulos, 2006] • Optimal/suboptimal MRS for shared channels - • [Jing, 2009] • GSC-based MRS - [Ikki, 2009] MRS

  6. Motivation: • best SRS  does not use available degree of freedom  SNR outage and BER are lower • optimal MRS  high search complexity  complexity increases exponential with number of relays • GSC-based MRS  may select more relays unnecessary  end-to-end SNR may far exceed the system requirements • above schemes require CSI of all relayed paths • We would like a MRS scheme which offers better trade-offs between the error/outage performance and spectral-efficiency!

  7. Proposed MRS scheme: • Key idea Adaptive threshold checking at D [Chen, 2004], [Yang, 2005] • proposed scheme selects the first relays such that the combined SNR of the first relayed paths and the direct path exceeds a preset threshold .

  8. Analysis: • The end-to-end SNR can be written as • The CDF of is given by • to make the analysis tractable, we use the well-known upper bound:  • the CDF, PDF and the MFG of are derived in closed-forms. • lower bounds are derived for (i) outage probability, (ii) average SER, and (iii) the average number of selected relays. • upper bounds are derived for (i) average SNR and (ii) ergodic capacity.

  9. Analysis (ctd): • the CDF of can be derived as where and • The PDF of is given by

  10. Analysis (ctd): • the average SER is derived as • the average number of selected relays is given by

  11. Numerical results: • Average BER of BPSK

  12. Numerical results (ctd): • Average number of selected relays

  13. Numerical results (ctd): • Outage probability comparison

  14. Numerical results (ctd): • Average BER of BPSK comparison

  15. Conclusion: • Our MRS scheme • outperforms optimal SRS, GSC-based MRS and fixed Lc out of L relays in low-to-moderate SNRs. • utilizes the wireless resources adaptively in fading environments. • Future directions • performance in high SNRs can be improved by • first ordering the relays • then applying the proposed algorithm

  16. References: • [Laneman, 2003] J. N. Laneman and G. W. Wornell, “Distributed space-time-coded protocols for exploiting cooperative diversity in wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2415–2425, Oct. 2003. • [Bletsas, 2006] A. Bletsas, A. Khisti, D. P. Reed, and A. Lippman, “A simple cooperative diversity method based on network path selection,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 659–672, Mar. 2006. • [Zhao, 2007] Y. Zhao, R. Adve, and T. J. Lim, “Improving amplify-and-forward relay networks: optimal power allocation versus selection,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 3114–3123, Aug. 2007. • [Sadek, 2006] A. K. Sadek, Z. Han, and K. J. R. Liu, “A distributed relay-assignment algorithm for cooperative communications in wireless networks,” in IEEE International Conf. on Commun. ICC., vol. 4, Jun. 2006, pp. 1592–1597. • [Michalopoulos, 2006] D. S. Michalopoulos, G. K. Karagiannidis, T. A. Tsiftsis, and R. K. Mallild, “An optimized user selection method for cooperative diversity systems,” in IEEE Global Telecommun. Conf., Nov./Dec. 2006. • [Jing, 2009] Y. Jing and H. Jafarkhani, “Single and multiple relay selection schemes and their achievable diversity orders,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1414–1423, Mar. 2009. • [Ikki, 2009] S. S. Ikki and M. H. Ahmed, “Performance analysis of generalized selection combining for amplify-and-forward cooperative-diversity networks,” in IEEE International Conf. on Commun., ICC., Dresden, Germany, Jun. 2009. • [Chen, 2004] Y. Chen and C. Tellambura, “An adaptive maximal ratio combining scheme and its performance analysis,” in 16-th international conf. on wireless commun., Wireless 2004, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, vol. 2, Jul. 2004, pp. 325–337. • [Yang, 2005] H.-C. Yang and M. S. Alouini, “MRC and GSC diversity combining with an output threshold,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1081–1090, May 2005.

  17. Thank You!

More Related