1 / 22

Overview of Mentored K Awards

Overview of Mentored K Awards. Shawna V. Hudson, PhD Assistant Professor of Family Medicine and Community Health UMDNJ-RWJMS The Cancer Institute of New Jersey April 13, 2010. Research Training and Development. Mentored Career Development

elias
Download Presentation

Overview of Mentored K Awards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of Mentored K Awards Shawna V. Hudson, PhD Assistant Professor of Family Medicine and Community Health UMDNJ-RWJMS The Cancer Institute of New Jersey April 13, 2010

  2. Research Training and Development Mentored Career Development Award (K01, K07, K22, K25, K99) or Small or Exploratory/Pilot Grant (R03, R21, R34) Predoctoral Fellowship (F31) or Short-term Training Support (T35) Independent Scientist or Mid- Career Award (K02, K05, K24) Research Project Grant (R01) Postdoctoral Training Support (T32, F32) Post- Doc. Early Career (Inst or Asst Prof) Mid-Career / Change (Assoc or Full Prof) Graduate or Medical School STAGES:

  3. Mentored Career Development Awards Designed for investigators who are in the early phases of establishing their research careers (e.g., junior faculty/research staff) and who need an additional period of mentored research training in order to become established as independent investigators.

  4. The purpose of a K award is… to enable you to become an independent researcher to protect your time for research activity to have your own R01 by the end of the K or soon after to generate pilot data

  5. TOTAL AND AVERAGE AWARD AMOUNT OF INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH CAREER AWARDS Average Award Amount Total Award Amount Total Award Amount (in millions) Average Award Amount (in thousands) Fiscal Year

  6. NUMBER OF RESEARCH CAREER AWARDSBY ACTIVITY Number of Awards Fiscal Year

  7. TOTAL FUNDING FOR COMPETING RESEARCH CAREER AWARDS BY INSTITUTES AND CENTERS Funding (in millions) Participating NIH Institutes and Centers Fiscal Year

  8. Mentored Career Development Awards (Mentored – Ks) • K01 Mentored Research Scientist Development Award (AHRQ, NIDDK, NCI etc.) • K07 Cancer Prevention, Control Behavioral and Population Sciences Career Development Award • K22 Career Transition Award (NCI, NHLBI, NIMH, NCMHD)

  9. What Are the Requirements? • Duration: 3-5 years • Minimum Research Effort: 75% • Renewability: None • Support: Varies across institute. For NCI salary is up to $100K and research is up to $30K per year

  10. Who Can Apply? • U.S. Citizen, Non-Citizen National, or Permanent Resident • Research or Clinical Doctoral Degree (PhD, MD) • Current PI of PHS Career Development (K) or certain Research (R) Awards are Ineligible • Former PI of PHS Career Development (K) and Research (R) Awards are Ineligible (except R03, R21, R34)

  11. Mentored Research Scientist Development Award (K01) • Purpose: to provide support and “protected time” for an intensive, supervised career development experience in the biomedical, behavioral, or clinical sciences leading to research independence.  • Some Institutes/Centers support individuals who • propose to train in a new field; • have had a hiatus in their research career • or to increase research workforce diversity.

  12. Success Rates – K Awards 38% Applicant Information - K awards http://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/

  13. Mentored K’s – Review Criteria Candidate Mentors, Consultants & Collaborators Career Development Plan Institutional Commitment Research Plan

  14. Beginning the Process Where do you want your career to take you? What problems do you want to take on? Who do you want to be when you grow up?

  15. What training, experience,and skills… Do you have Do you lack and must obtain to get you to your goals?

  16. Statements by Mentors, Co-Mentors, and Collaborators • Assemble a complementary team • Choose a primary mentor who is a senior investigator with a track-record of NIH funding; your primary mentor should be at the home institution but not always. • Include co-mentors who will complement the primary mentor’s strengths. • Each member of your “team” must play a role in your training or research plan. • Establish a relatively small (3-4) mentoring committee. • If you need to add additional members, call them scientific or technical advisors/collaborators, who have a relatively narrow area of responsibility and focus.

  17. Statements by Mentors, Co-Mentors, and Collaborators (Cont’d) • Evaluation criteria for primary mentor: • Appropriateness of mentor’s research qualifications in the area of this application. • Quality and extent of mentor’s role in providing guidance and advice to candidate. • Previous experience in fostering the development of more junior researchers. • History of productivity and support. • Adequacy of support for the research project.

  18. Training Plan Should provide you the skills & knowledge you lack Can include taking coursework, spending time in a real world setting, readings & discussion with a mentor, etc. Choose mentors that are the best fit – not the closest geographically Always consider training outside your area!

  19. Description of Institutional Environment • Evaluation criteria: • Adequacy of research facilities and the availability of appropriate educational opportunities. • Quality and relevance of the environment for scientific and professional development of the candidate.

  20. Institutional Commitment to Candidate’s Research Career Development • Evaluation criteria • Applicant institution’s commitment to the scientific development of the candidate and assurances that the institution intends the candidate to be “an integral part of its research program.” • Applicant institution’s commitment to protect at least 75% of the candidate’s effort for proposed career development activities. • These assurances are stated in a letter from your department chair or division chief.

  21. Research Plan (in K Awards) Should be a logical extension of the training plan Should provide you an opportunity to try out new skills & knowledge learned in training Should provide you with the experience and data you will need for your first R01 or R34 Should be another opportunity to learn from mentors

  22. Useful websites NIH “K Kiosk” http://grants1.nih.gov/training/careerdevelopmentawards.htm NIH funding information at http://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/ NIH Reporter lists current grants at http://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm

More Related