1 / 26

Clouds types, SST and wind stress in the East Pacific

EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise 9-24 October 2001 Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter (University of Washington) Chris Fairall, Taneil Uttal (NOAA/ETL) Bob Weller (Woods Hole OI). Clouds types, SST and wind stress in the East Pacific. Goals.

eldon
Download Presentation

Clouds types, SST and wind stress in the East Pacific

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise9-24 October 2001Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter (University of Washington) Chris Fairall, Taneil Uttal (NOAA/ETL)Bob Weller (Woods Hole OI)

  2. Clouds types, SST and wind stress in the East Pacific

  3. Goals Document cloud and boundary layer structure in the SE Pacific Assess the importance of drizzle processes to cloud thickness and extent Compare results with other Sc regimes and with large-scale models Maintain WHOI IMET buoy at 20S 85W

  4. Participants NOAA/ETL (surface met., fluxes, mm radar, lidar)

  5. Participants UNAM (aerosol concentration and characterization)

  6. Participants WHOI (CTDs, IMET buoy)

  7. Participants University of Washington (sondes, 5 cm scanning radar, meth blue, cloud photos)

  8. EPIC Sc cruise 9-24 Oct. 2001

  9. At Buoy q Sharp PBL inversion Cloud base qv Figure by Kim Comstock Radiosonde observations

  10. Cloud top and dBZ (MMCR), base (ceilometer), LCL (surf. met.) cldtop cld base LCL

  11. [m s-1] ECMWF VERTICAL VELOCITY Diurnal Cycle 10 [dBZ] 0 -10

  12. SE PACIFIC [85W, 20S], 1999-2000 LWP [g m-2] LOCAL TIME [hr] Large scale observations of the diurnal cycle of low cloud (cont.) TRMM TMI (microwave imager) observations of LWP Wood, Bretherton, and Hartmann (2002) 0 6 12 18 24

  13. MEAN LWP AMPLITUDE [fraction] TIME OF MAXIMUM LWP • Strongest diurnal cycle of LWP found in the regions of low cloud to the west of continents • Larger amplitudes in southern hemisphere • Peak LWP at 02-06 hr showing diurnal cycle of insolation is key modulator • Summer max. in amplitude Geographical variations 150 100 50 0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 12 6 0 18 12

  14.  0.05 cm s-1 zi/t + u•zi= we - ws Diurnal cycle of subsidencews, entrainmentwe, and zi/t NIGHT DAY NIGHT DAY we dzi/dt ws swe=0.24 cm s-1;sws=0.26 cm s-1;szi/t=0.44 cm s-1

  15. Mixed layer budgets Net radiative flux divergence Free trop. LW SW Entrainment DqT DSL zi qT SL Mixed layer Latent Evap Sensible Heating Precip Ocean

  16. Estimating budget terms cloud radar, ECMWF subsidence, + MODIS BL depth climatology 3hr radiosonde profiles, observed LWP and Fu-Liou radiation scheme • Advection • terms estimated using NCEP and ECMWF reanalyses • Storage terms estimated using sonde profiles Entrainment LW SW zi bulk flux algorithm using Ron Brown met measurements cloud radar + microphysical model LE SH Rain Ocean

  17. Solar absorption and drizzle evaporative stabilization Solar absorption Drizzle evaporaton SW zi Evaporative cooling cooling warming Ocean

  18. Drizzle + solar decoupling? Strong TKE source in cloud Solar Evaporating drizzle suppresses TKE below cloud Drizzle height [m] 2 5 8 11 14 17 20 23 Local time Buoyancy flux

  19. Diurnal cycle of convective velocity scale Drizzle and solar radiation reduce mean w* by comparable amounts

  20. dBZ 0730 0530 Sample of C-band scanning radar and coincident MMCR 20 km

  21. Number/second Z=58R1.1 Meth Blue Rain Rate

  22. Remotely-sensed cloud microphysics (Rob Wood, UW) …UNAM also found a strong diurnal signal in submicron aerosol conc.

  23. 250 km 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 g m-2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 mm SHIP • 3 10 30 100 300 1000cm-3 MODIS 10/16/2001; 10:00 Local (16:00 UTC) Liquid water path Effective radius Droplet concentration

  24. Comparison of 6-day mean 20S 85W profiles with models (Peter Caldwell, UW) • All models (esp CAM) have too shallow a PBL. • CAM2 LWC all in lowest 3 levels (70-630 m). • Observed LWC mainly at 800-1300 m.

  25. Conclusions A remarkable dataset was gathered documenting both spatial and diurnal variability of the SE Pacific Sc regime Pronounced diurnal cycle, amplified by subsidence wave from S America. Mesoscale drizzle cells ubiquitous, especially at night; rain mostly evaporates above surface, sensitive to cloud drop conc. Boundary layer deeper than current global models; well-mixed in early evening but near total shut-down of entrainment in early morning due to combination of solar absorption and drizzle evaporation

More Related