1 / 48

South Africa’s bioenergy policy and the economics of biofuels: Lessons from the US experience

South Africa’s bioenergy policy and the economics of biofuels: Lessons from the US experience. Patrick Westhoff ( westhoffp@missouri.edu ) Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute ( www.fapri.missouri.edu ) Conference of the Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa

elden
Download Presentation

South Africa’s bioenergy policy and the economics of biofuels: Lessons from the US experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. South Africa’s bioenergy policy and the economics of biofuels: Lessons from the US experience Patrick Westhoff (westhoffp@missouri.edu) Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (www.fapri.missouri.edu) Conference of the Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa Johannesburg, September 27, 2007

  2. Agenda • Basic economics of biofuel markets • US experience and impact on global markets • Lessons from the US experience

  3. Biofuel markets • Biofuel markets in US and elsewhere are very distorted by policies • In spite of distortions, basic market principles apply • Producers respond to output and input prices • Biofuel use responds to changes in prices of biofuels and petroleum-based fuels • Traders look for arbitrage possibilities

  4. US biofuel supply economics • Biofuel producers seek to maximize profits • In 2006 and 2007, ethanol prices have been well above historical levels • As a result, the profitability of ethanol production has been very high • Response: much plant investment, high rates of capacity utilization • Situation now appears to be changing: abnormal profits do not persist

  5. Source: Calculations based on data from www.neo.ne.gov/statshtml/html

  6. Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007, with revised 2006/07 figures.

  7. US ethanol plant capacity, Jan. 1 Source: Renewable Fuel Association. Sep. 13, 2007 totals: 129 plants with 26 bil. liters of capacity; 25 bil. liters under construction (76 plants) or expansion (9 plants)

  8. Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007, with revised 2006/07 figures.

  9. Economics of a US dry mill ethanol plant(Dollars per liter of ethanol) Source: FAPRI calculations based on data from a variety of sources. The final column is based in part on CBOT futures prices for ethanol and maize on 21 September 2007.

  10. Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  11. Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  12. So let’s back up a little • Characteristics of US biofuel industry • What policies support the industry? • Why is it primarily based on maize? • Interaction of US biofuel markets with other markets

  13. Incentives supporting US biofuel industry • Most important: tax credits to those who blend ethanol or biodiesel with other fuels • $0.51 per gallon ($0.135 per liter) for ethanol • $1.00 per gallon ($0.264 per liter) for biodiesel from “virgin” vegetable oil • Various state subsidies • Lower state taxes on ethanol-blended fuels • Investment incentives • These are generally much smaller than federal tax credit

  14. Mandates and regulations supporting US biofuel industry • Renewable fuel standard • Requires use of 7.5 billion gallons (28.4 billion liters) of biofuels by 2012 • Will probably be surpassed in 2008--existing mandate unlikely to have major market impact in future • But Senate has passed bill to expand the mandate • Clean air rules • Rules require or encourage use of oxygenates in some regions to reduce certain types of pollution • MTBE no longer available—ethanol only economical alternative • State mandates • For example, 10% ethanol blend requirement in Minnesota

  15. Trade policies affecting US biofuel industry • Tariff on imported ethanol • 2.5% plus $0.54 per gallon ($0.143 per liter) on ethanol imported directly from Brazil • Exemption for ethanol imported from Caribbean (up to 7% of US consumption) • Restrictions on sugar imports • Make US sugar price much higher than price on world market • Main reason US makes ethanol from maize, not sugar—given US policies, maize is a cheaper feedstock

  16. Source: FAPRI estimates, early 2007. The August FAPRI update shows more production.

  17. Source: FAPRI estimates, early 2007. The August FAPRI update shows more production.

  18. Biofuel and related markets • Biofuel markets have strong interactions with other commodity markets • Petroleum, gasoline and diesel markets have major impacts on biofuel use and prices • Markets for maize, sugar, vegetable oils affect feedstock costs for biofuel producers • Biofuel demand for feedstocks affects markets for grains, oilseeds, sugar, meats, dairy products…

  19. Source: FAPRI January 2007 baseline and August baseline update

  20. US ethanol demand • Portion of demand results from mandates and regulations • Accounted for most ethanol use in 2006 • Explains ethanol prices well above energy value relative to gasoline in 2006 • Without new laws or regulations, only modest growth in this category (grows with total gasoline use) • Rest of demand reflects voluntary decisions to blend ethanol, buy ethanol blended gasoline • Growing share of total demand, mostly in 10% blends • Uncertainty: at what price?

  21. Price of ethanol in US market • Energy equivalent: approximately 2/3 that of gasoline on volume basis • All else equal, might expect retail ethanol price to be 2/3 that of gasoline • Brazilian experience: consumers given choice will choose cheaper fuel • Higher prices could result if consumers value octane or do not know they are buying ethanol blends • But current ethanol market prices are actually below 2/3 that of gasoline, correcting for tax credits, mark-ups, etc. • As supplies exceed quantities needed to satisfy mandates and regulations, what will be the price of ethanol?

  22. US retail gasoline and ethanol prices 85% of retail gasoline price 69% of retail gasoline price Implied ethanol retail price = Omaha rack price - tax credit plus difference between Omaha gasoline rack price and national retail gasoline price Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  23. US wholesale gasoline, ethanol prices $0.68 $0.57 $0.48 $0.45 Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  24. Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  25. Source: FAPRI stochastic baseline, February 2007

  26. US maize use Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  27. Source: USDA estimates, August 2007

  28. US grain farm prices $133 $119 $79 Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007. More current data suggests higher 2007/08 prices, at least for wheat.

  29. Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  30. Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  31. US market and loan net returns Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  32. US area planted Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  33. Source: FAPRI-MU estimates, August 2007

  34. US soybean meal and oil prices Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  35. US biodiesel plant costs and returns Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  36. US ethanol net imports • US ethanol imports increased dramatically in 2006 • High US prices meant Brazilian ethanol could pay full duty and still be competitive • Lower imports projected for 2007-12, as lower US prices make Brazilian imports paying full duty too expensive • Has contributed to lower ethanol and sugar prices in Brazilian and world markets • Example of connections among markets and policies Source: FAPRI baseline update, August 2007

  37. Other effects of biofuel expansion • Incentives to expand crop production, change crop mix, and limit crop use around the world • Increased feed costs eventually translate into higher meat and dairy prices • But lots of “noise” means people can argue about magnitude of effects • For example: What is the effect of biofuel expansion on US consumer food prices?

  38. US farm cash receipts and food expenditures Source: August 2007 USDA Economic Research Service estimates of farm cash receipts through 2007 and food expenditures through 2006. Estimate of 2007 food expenditures based on year-to-date change in food sales reported by ERS in August 2007.

  39. Annual change in US farm cash receipts and food expenditures Source: August 2007 USDA Economic Research Service estimates of farm cash receipts through 2007 and food expenditures through 2006. Estimate of 2007 food expenditures based on year-to-date change in food sales reported by ERS in August 2007.

  40. Annual change in US consumer prices(Semiannual data, change from previous year) Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/data/, September 2007. Note: Average annual rate of increase for 2000-2007: 2.75% for all items, 2.57% for food

  41. So has expanded biofuel production increased consumer food prices in the US? • Yes • Higher grain and vegetable oil prices directly contribute to costs of items from breakfast cereals to salad oils to soft drinks • Higher feed costs eventually mean higher meat and dairy product prices • But • Don’t attribute all changes in food prices to biofuels—many other factors at play • For example, dairy prices have increased much more than feed costs, because of strong global demand largely unrelated to biofuels • And most of the cost of food happens after the farmgate in the US • Impact is likely to be a one-time increase in the level of consumer food prices—not a persistent increase in the rate of inflation

  42. Lessons from the US experience (1) • Even in a distorted market, basic economics is still important • Producers must expect to make money to invest, and must cover marginal costs to stay in business • Unless mandates get in the way, users will look at relative prices in deciding what to buy • Markets are interrelated because of trade and substitution effects

  43. Lessons from the US experience (2) • Policies can strongly influence the market • Subsidies can raise returns to biofuel producers and/or lower costs to biofuel consumers • Mandates can raise prices to consumers and producers • Tariffs and other trade policies will affect where biofuels are produced

  44. Lessons from the US experience (3) • Biofuels have impacts on other markets • More biofuel production means higher global prices for feedstocks, with spillover effects on other markets • Equilibrium will occur when rate of return to biofuel production similar to other enterprises

  45. An important distinction • South Africa is a (relatively) small country • South African biofuel production unlikely to have major impacts on world prices for biofuels, grains, oilseeds, or sugar • Impacts on South African maize and sugar prices • Small if South Africa still a net exporter of maize, sugar • But if South Africa becomes an importer, prices will rise to import parity (world price + transportation costs) from export parity (world price – transportation costs)

  46. Concluding comments • Biofuels have had and will have major impacts on global markets • We all have a lot to learn, and much of what we think we know today will prove to be wrong • But in analyzing impacts of biofuels, don’t overlook basic economic principles

  47. Extra slide

  48. Dry Mill Ethanol Plant: Assumptions Sources: 2005/06 and 2006/07 are from the FAPRI baseline update, August 2007 and other current information. The December 2008 corn and ethanol futures reflect the CBOT futures close, Sep. 21, 2007 (corn costs assume a $0.20/bu. basis relative to the $3.69 CBOT close), and the DDGS value reflects USDA-reported prices for Iowa on Sep. 21, 2007.

More Related