1 / 15

The simple protection method

I. The previous protection methods. The maximum distance:. The simple protection method. (Với: D = a + b). Table 1. BIL and U p. a : The maximum separation between J and pole-mounted transformer, m b : Distance between J and surge arrester, m U t : Arrester residual voltage, kV

Download Presentation

The simple protection method

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. I. The previous protection methods The maximum distance: • The simple protection method (Với: D = a + b) Table 1. BIL and Up a : The maximum separation between J and pole-mounted transformer, m b : Distance between J and surge arrester, m Ut : Arrester residual voltage, kV C: Velocity of wave propagation, C = 300 m/s. BIL: Basic Insulation Level of Transformer (KV)

  2. D I. The previous protection methods 2. The improved protection method (J. R. Lucas Method) O : Point of lightning stroke S0 : Rate of rise at O, kV/µs I0 : Lightning stroke current , kA X :Distance in which a surge with an infinite slope will decay to slope SA at A, m SA : Rate of rise of surge voltage at A, kV/µs   : Reflection coefficient at transformer Et : Peak surge voltage at transformer, kV Sf : Shielding factor (0,3 ÷ 0,5) N : The number of direct stroke into line, times/100km/year h : Height of nearby objects, m b : Horizontal span between outermost conductors, m Ng: Number of stroke per km2 per year LF: Lifetime of transformer, year FR: Failure rate of transformer, % Nf :Number of lightning surges arriving at A /year, with slope higher SA T : Wave front time, s k : Corona damping constant, kV.km/s .

  3. D I. The previous protection methods 2. The improved protection method (J. R. Lucas Method) O : Point of lightning stroke S0 : Rate of rise at O, kV/µs I0 : Lightning stroke current , kA X :Distance in which a surge with an infinite slope will decay to slope SA at A, m SA : Rate of rise of surge voltage at A, kV/µs   : Reflection coefficient at transformer Et : Peak surge voltage at transformer, kV Sf : Shielding factor (0,3 ÷ 0,5) N : The number of direct stroke into line, times/100km/year h : Height of nearby objects, m b : Horizontal span between outermost conductors, m Ng: Number of stroke per km2 per year LF: Lifetime of transformer, year FR: Failure rate of transformer, % Nf :Number of lightning surges arriving at A /year, with slope higher SA T : Wave front time, s k : Corona damping constant, kV.km/s .

  4. D I. The previous protection methods 2. The improved protection method (J. R. Lucas Method) O : Point of lightning stroke S0 : Rate of rise at O, kV/µs I0 : Lightning stroke current , kA X :Distance in which a surge with an infinite slope will decay to slope SA at A, m SA : Rate of rise of surge voltage at A, kV/µs   : Reflection coefficient at transformer Et : Peak surge voltage at transformer, kV Sf : Shielding factor (0,3 ÷ 0,5) N : The number of direct stroke into line, times/100km/year h : Height of nearby objects, m b : Horizontal span between outermost conductors, m Ng: Number of stroke per km2 per year LF: Lifetime of transformer, year FR: Failure rate of transformer, % Nf :Number of lightning surges arriving at A /year, with slope higher SA T : Wave front time, s k : Corona damping constant, kV.km/s .

  5. I. The previous protection methods • The previous methods: • Accounting for influence elements with some experiment parameters • Just considered to single transformer substation • The proposed method: • Determining surge arrester‘s location for 3-line, 2-transfomer substation based on: • IEEE Std C62.22.2009 • Influence elements (can be calculated) • Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) of Transformer

  6. II. The proposed protection method The proposed protection method based on IEEE Std C62.22.2009 (3-line , 2 - transformer substation) S.1.Eliminate 1 transformer and determine the line which the lightning wave transmitted into. S.2.Define the following parameters: - J, the common point between transformer, surge arrester and the line identified in step 01. - D1, distance from J to pole-mounted transformer - D2, distance from arrester to ground d2 = A, B, C: Line A, B, C. T1,T2 : Transformer T1 and T2 D1: Separate distance between T1 and line, m. D2: Separate distance between T2 and line, m. Ntt: Number of identified lines S.3.Eliminate all line connected to D1 S.4.Calculate SJ , kA/s

  7. II. The proposed protection method The proposed method based on IEEE Std C62.22.2009 S.5.Distance : stroke - substation , km with: B: insulation equipments. d1: distance between line and arrester , m. D2: distance between arrester and ground, m. S : slope wave, kA/s. MTBF: mean time between failure, year FR: acceptable failure rate, % N : number of stroke into line, times /100 km/year Kc: corona damping constant , kV.km/s Va: Mức bảo vệ đầu sóng của chống sét van tại 0,5s, kV Z : line impedance,  L : Inductance, H. S.6. Voltage of Arrester

  8. II. The proposed protection method The proposed protection method based on IEEE Std C62.22.2009 S.7. Determine D1 and D2: D1 = min (D1_T1_Line A ; D1_T1_Line B ; D1_T1_Line C) D2 = min (D2_T2_Line A ; D2_T2_Line B ; D2_T2_Line C)

  9. II. The proposed protection method Shielding Factor Object ‘s Height Nonlinear regression technique Curve Fitting Matlab (Sf) Build 16 relationships Sf, H và DO SfL: S.F at left side SfR: S.F at right side Sf = SfL + SfR Distance from objects to line (DO = x), m H = 10m: Sf = 5,013.10 - 7.x3 – 6,051.10-5.x2 – 0,003655.x + 0,4813 H = 14m: Sf = – 6,047.10 - 12.x5 + 1,452.10 - 8.x4 – 3,332.10 - 6.x3 +0,3459.10 - 3.x2 – 0,0247.x + 0,9982

  10. II. The proposed protection method The number of stroke into line , times/100km/year The inductance line which connect to surge arrester - The inductance at line (length 1 m) , H/m Which: , m - The inductance line which connect to surge arrester , H

  11. (3) (1) II. The proposed protection method Check MTBF of transformer Nonlinear regression technique Curve Fitting Matlab MTBF (year) Build 6 relationships Sf, H và DO Ng (times/km2.year)

  12. III. OPSOLA Program 1. Introduction of OPSOLA Program OPSOLA  (Optimal Placement Software Of Lightning Arrester ) Determine optimized arrester’s location Check MTBF of transformer Single phase, single transformer substation Three-phase, two-transformer substation

  13. III. OPSOLA Program 2. Calculation Interface Main Interface Configuration

  14. III. OPSOLA Program 3. Single line, single transformer Substation

  15. III. OPSOLA Program 4. Three-line, two-transformer Substation

More Related