1 / 21

DPAS II

DPAS II. MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare. Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci. 2011-2012 Five Components. 1. Planning & Preparation 2. Classroom Environment 3. Instruction 4. Professional Responsibilities 5. Student Improvement – Doesn’t count this year. DPAS II Process Step One:.

edolie
Download Presentation

DPAS II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DPAS II MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci

  2. 2011-2012 Five Components • 1. Planning & Preparation • 2. Classroom Environment • 3. Instruction • 4. Professional Responsibilities • 5. Student Improvement – Doesn’t count this year

  3. DPAS II ProcessStep One: • 2010-2011 • School Wide Goal Set • Teacher Goal Setting Conference • Aligns with School Goal • 2011-2012 Revision • Student Growth Measurement Conference • Student Growth Measurement Form Completed

  4. Step Two: Pre-Observation • Pre-Observation Form • Announced observation • Optional for experienced teachers if administration & teacher both agree • Pre-Observation Conference • Teacher discusses Component One • Turn in Professional Development Form (if not done) • May discuss Component Four • Have lesson plans & artifacts

  5. Step Three -Observation • “Experienced” Teacher – (Continuing or Advanced License/or Standard or Professional Status Certificate Prior to August 1, 2003) Tenured Teacher • Satisfactory • 1 Announced • 1 Summative every two years • Unsatisfactory • 1 Announced • 1 Unannounced • 1 Summative each year • Improvement Plan Revision- Experienced Teacher Rated: “Highly Effective or Effective” on Summative Experienced Teacher Rated: “Needs Improvement or Ineffective” on Summative

  6. Observation “Novice” Teacher Initial Licence (Non-Tenured) • 2 Announced • 1 Unannounced • 1 Summative each year • If they have “Needs Improvement” & “Ineffective” on their Summative it can require more observations with their Improvement Plan • Should be at least 30 minutes long • Can not occur during the first or last 5 days of school

  7. Step 4 Post-Observation • Lesson Reflection Form- optional • Conference within 10 days of observation • Takes place in the teacher’s room if possible • Teacher & evaluator discuss data collected • Update Professional Responsibilities Form if needed

  8. Step 5 – Level of Performance Ratings • At the end of the Post-Observation Conference teacher and evaluator should have an understanding of the teacher’s performance during the evaluation.

  9. Step 6 Formative Feedback Documentation • Formative Feedback Form- Required for announced & unannounced • Must be given to teacher within 10 days of observation • Teacher signs & returns form within 5 days. This is not for agreement but acknowledgement • If teacher disagrees- 15 days to submit in writing • Teacher can request second conference • Formative Feedback Documentation placed on DDOE’s online Education Reporting System

  10. Step 7 Summative Evaluation Conference • Review all documents for full cycle: Student Growth Measures Selection Form(s), Professional Responsibilities Form(s), Formative Feedback Form(s), and other relevant written communications from evaluator. • Collect data, track, and analyze progress toward attaining Component 5 goal(s).

  11. Step 8 Summative Documentation Process • Within 10 days of the Summative Conference evaluator fills out Summative Evaluation Form • Components One to Four teacher is rated either “satisfactory” or “unsatisfactory” • Component Five (which doesn’t count this year) teacher is rated: • 80-100% “Exceeds” • 50-79% “Satisfactory” • Below 50% “Unsatisfactory”

  12. Component 5 2011-2012 Data • Part I – School Wide 30% All Staff • Option 1 Reading DCAS Scores • Option 2 Math DCAS Scores • Best results for “AYP” Fall-Spring Growth Calculations • Part II – Student Cohort 20% • DCAS teachers (Grades 3-10) All students • DCAS Instructional Scores – Fall to Spring Growth Model • Non DCAS teachers (Grades 3-10) • Select cohort ahead (min 25) • Part III- Teacher Specific Measures 50% • A Non DCAS Assessment • Approved by Department of Education & Secretary of Education • Directly tied to teaching assignment

  13. If missing Parts: • If school doesn’t have Part III • Then teacher evaluated on: • Part 1 = 30% • Part 2 = 70% • If school doesn’t have Part II • Part 1 = 30% • Part 3 = 70% • If school doesn’t have Part II & Part III • Part 1 = 100%

  14. 2011-2012 Summative Evaluation Ratings • “Satisfactory” • Met criteria in at least 3 of the 4 components • “Unsatisfactory” • Did not meet criteria in 2 of the 4 components • If Unsatisfactory then put on an Improvement Plan

  15. 2012-2013 • "Highly Effective" means: • Satisfactory in 4 of the 5 components including a rating of “Exceeds” for Component Five. • "Effective" means: • Satisfactory rating in at least 3 of the 5 components including the Component V, but the teacher does not meet the student growth requirements for a "Highly Effective" rating.

  16. "Needs Improvement" means: • Has earned 1 or 2 satisfactory ratings out of the 5 components including a satisfactory rating in Component Five, or • Has earned 3 or 4 satisfactory ratings out of the 5 components and the teacher has earned an unsatisfactory rating in Component Five. • "Ineffective" means: • Has received 0, 1, or 2 satisfactory ratings out of the 5 components, and the teacher has received an unsatisfactory rating in Component Five, or • The teacher's overall Summative Evaluation rating is "Needs Improvement" for three consecutive years. In this case, the teacher's rating is re-categorized as “Ineffective.”

  17. Resources: State of Delaware (Oct. 2011) DPAS II Delaware Performance Appraisal System Retrieved from: http://www.doe.k12.de.us/csa/dpasii/default.shtml

  18. Component One –Planning & Preparation • The following criteria and elements are evaluated under Component 1 • 1a. Selecting Instructional Goals • 1b. Designing Coherent Instruction • 1c. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy • 1d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students • 1e. Designing Student Assessments

  19. Component Two • 2a. Managing Classroom Procedures • 2b. Managing Student Behavior • 2c. Creating an Environment to Support Learning • 2d. Organizing Physical Space • •

  20. Component Three • 3a. Engaging Students in Learning • 3b. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness • 3c. Communicating Clearly and Accurately • 3d. Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques • 3e. Using Assessment in Instruction

  21. Component Four • 4a. Communicating with Family • 4b. Recording Data in a Student Record System • 4c. Growing and Developing Professionally • 4d. Reflecting on Professional Practice

More Related