1 / 18

Table 2. Entry Averages and First Year Performance, StFX, 1998-2004 Average

Average Percent of 1st & 2nd Year Students in Classes Under 50, by Type of University, Maclean's 2004. Percent of 1st & 2nd Year Students in Classes Under 50, Top Ranked Undergraduate Universities, Maclean's 2004.

eburroughs
Download Presentation

Table 2. Entry Averages and First Year Performance, StFX, 1998-2004 Average

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Average Percent of 1st & 2nd Year Students in Classes Under 50, by Type of University, Maclean's 2004

  2. Percent of 1st & 2nd Year Students in Classes Under 50, Top Ranked Undergraduate Universities, Maclean's 2004

  3. Figure 1. Percent of Direct Entry Students With Incoming Averages Above 75%, and Percent Change from 1994, 2004, Acadia, Mount Allison, StFX

  4. Table 2. Entry Averages and First Year Performance, StFX, 1998-2004 Average Year of High % Above 75 % Below 55 Entry School University University ________ ________ __________ __________ 1998 77.9 14.8 24.1 1999 79.4 14.8 23.4 2000 79.2 19.4 20.6 2001 79.5 19.3 17.1 2002 80.6 19.4 18.7 2003 82.2 22.0 11.7 2004 83.9 . .

  5. Figure 2. Percent First Year Averages Above 75, Percent Below 55, Students Entering StFX,1998-2003

  6. Average High School and First Year Grades, Direct Entry Students, StFX 1998 - 2004

  7. Figure 4. Geographic Origins StFX Incoming Students, 1998-2004

  8. Measuring Satisfaction with Academic Programs • An index of satisfaction with the quality of the academic experience was created. The index combined six items measured using 9-point response categories. The items included three assessing the overall quality experienced by the respondents in their major department (see question 13 in the questionnaire): • Quality of content of courses • Quality of instruction • Helpfulness of faculty • Three questions (questions 24, 25, & 26) asked for a rating on three items relating to their overall satisfaction with the St. F.X. experience: • Overall, I feel a received a good education at St. F.X. • I would be delighted if a child of mine decided to attend St. F.X. • If I had to do it all over again, I would choose the same program • The index was tested for reliability and the test yielded a standardized item Alpha of .7657, considered to be acceptable for a 6 item index (the mean inter-item correlation was .35). The mean score for the respondents in 2003 was 45.5 (sd= 6.16). This score represents an average of 7.6 on each of the six 9-point scales or 84.3 percent of the highest possible score of 54 (9 x 6). Overall, the respondents are very positive about their experiences at St. F.X. There is also a positive trend in the overall measures of satisfaction when the satisfaction measures are compared with those taken in earlier surveys. For presentation purposes, the index measures were converted to a score out of 100.

  9. Satisfaction with Academic Programs, StFX, by Year

  10. Mean Satisfaction Scores by Area of Study, StFX Seniors, by Year *In 1997 and 1999 Information systems was included in the Applied Sciences category; in 2001 Information Systems is a department within the Schwartz School Of Business.

  11. Percent of students Who Would Choose StFX If They Could Do It Over Again, by Year *In 1997 and 1999 Information systems was included in the Applied Sciences category; in 2001 Information Systems is a department within the Schwartz School of Business. Education graduates were inadvertently missed in the ’03 survey

  12. Percentage of Program Revenue From Four Sources, StFX, 1983-2004

  13. Scholarship Expenditures as % of Program Expenditures, StFX, 1983 - 2004

  14. Endowment as % of Program Expenditures, StFX, 1983 - 2004

  15. Unfunded Debt as % of Program Expenditures, StFX, 1983 - 2004

More Related