1 / 7

Defining independence:

Defining independence:. Two dimensions of independence, and their sources. Control vs. Independence. Autonomy/Control : the degree of uncertainty we will tolerate in judicial decisions; the amount of discretion left to individual judges

dragon
Download Presentation

Defining independence:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Defining independence: Two dimensions of independence, and their sources

  2. Control vs. Independence • Autonomy/Control: the degree of uncertainty we will tolerate in judicial decisions; the amount of discretion left to individual judges • Independence/Partisanship: the extent to which the decision-maker is identified with one of the parties to the dispute.

  3. Control over preferences vs. control over decision-making • lack of preference independence: the over-identification of judges with a party that has an interest in the dispute (often, the executive) • E.g., the Menem court in Argentina, the Constitutional Court in Kyrgyzstan under Akayev • lack of decisional independence: the capacity of an interested party (often, the executive) to interfere with judicial decision-making • E.g., “telephone justice” in Bahia and across the region

  4. The source of control: institutional design • Mechanisms of appointment produce different levels of control over the preferences of appointees • Compare simple majority of Senate, to simple majority with filibuster rule, to 2/3 majority • Mechanisms that control decision-making (discipline, promotion, compensation, appellate oversight) produce different levels of control over decision-making • Compare impeachment, to discipline and promotion by an oversight body • Variation in degrees depends on capacity: access to information, available sanctions, ease of use

  5. The source of partisanship: politics • Factional dominance of mechanisms of appointment and control • Open and public mechanisms force the use of more consensual standards, so reduce any one faction’s capacity to bias outcomes • Internal mechanisms typically have more information than external mechanisms and are more effective, but harder for outside factions to control • When these mechanisms are controlled by an identifiable faction, the courts lose (at least the perception) of independence. • Political Partisanship • Other kinds of factions: e.g. economic elites (São Paulo, Brz); conservative social elites (Córdoba, Arg)

  6. In short: Politics interacts with institutional design to produce varying levels of independence and control.

  7. Independence vs. Uncertainty

More Related