Exploring the Role of Networks on Strategic Decisions Making of Pastoralist in Central Australia. Agsitment – Report Adoption - Proposal. Collaborators: Nick Abel, Art Langston Ryan McAllister, Ian Gordon Yiheyis Maru, Paul Box 2.Yiheyis Maru, Paul Box,
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Exploring the Role of Networks on Strategic Decisions Making of Pastoralist in Central Australia
Statistical Network Modelling
TABLE 1. QAP-CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS
At α=0.05 ‘p<0.05’, both family and friendship ties are significantly correlated with agistment network.
TABLE 2. REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS
TABLE 3. MODEL FIT
Social network especially friendship ties play a significant role in mediating agistment practice. However, a lot of other factors are needed to explain the variability in agistment ties.
Parametric social network modelling (P* approaches)
Dynamic multi-agent and network modelling
Can a model of land attributes and individual behavior reproduce the global picture?
Build from the bottom up …
At what point does a pastoralist agist?
Different kinds of relationships between pastoralists create different weights of connections, affecting likelihood of agisting (or other practice)
Little on the role of pastoral networks on adoption
Indications of social costs