1 / 17

Human Capital

Human Capital. Michael D. Intriligator , Serguey Braguinsky , and Vitaly Shvydko. Scientific Heritage. Development of the former Soviet union Research workers and technical personnel. Post-Soviet Deterioration. Government expenditures Hiring and real wages in the 1990s

diep
Download Presentation

Human Capital

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Human Capital Michael D. Intriligator, SergueyBraguinsky, and VitalyShvydko

  2. Scientific Heritage • Development of the former Soviet union • Research workers and technical personnel

  3. Post-Soviet Deterioration • Government expenditures • Hiring and real wages in the 1990s • Emigration of Russians

  4. Impediments and Policies • Russian research institutes • A technological lead of Russia • Commercialization

  5. Information Technology • The IT industry in Russia • Problem: lack of long-term economic stability and funding

  6. General Issues • The policy for Russia’s economic development • Requirement of Russia

  7. Conclusion • Russia’s latent comparative advantage by human capital

  8. 18. Restructuring Agencies By David Ellerman, Dmitri Kuvalin, and Marshall Pomer

  9. Situation • Voucher Privatization lead to unprepared managers • Question of State Responsibility in Bankrupcy cases • Three Alt • Liquidation • Renationalization • Reorganization cum restructuring

  10. Restructuring Agency • “Legislated powers to oversee the dismantling and revitalization of incompletely privatized, renationalized, or bankrupt enterprises” • Decentralization • Sister Companies

  11. Decentralization • Smaller Firms: Less distance between levels • Split up horizontally or vertically into self-managing teams/profit centers • Spin offs

  12. Process of Enterprise Decomposition • Firm is divided into separate profit centers • Spun off • Shut down • Ideally, liquidation of nonviable units AND new daughter firms of viable • OR, conglomerates. • Various Roles and Expectations

  13. Proposed Restructuring Agency • “Expedite reorganization of large organizations in serious default” • Legislated authority to decide what parts of mother company should be liquidated/spun off. • Regional – autonomy given to branch locations • Company fail to comply, bankruptcy • Large enterprises with technological potential • Accountability

  14. Management • Re-hired by new sister company • Agency review qualification of owner’s choice in managers • Training • Manager Buy Outs (MBOs)

  15. Limits to Decentralization • Lost control over industrial policy, tax compliance, and capital flight • Salaries (Larger firm= bigger salary) • How unbundled • Vertical vs. lateral integration • Sometimes, merger better.

  16. Outside Source • “Do outside directors and new managers helpimprove firm performance? An exploratory study in Russian privatization” by Mike W. Penga, Trevor Buckb, Igor Filatotchev. Journal World of Business • Looked at restructuring • Privitization to insiders = no restructuring • Outside Ownership = more restructuring • Performance Increase with New Managers

  17. Results • Claim 1. True • Claim 2. False • Claim 3. False • Reasons why • Strong Collective Mentality • Foreigners Limited to push for reform • Economy

More Related