1 / 32

Hartnell Climate Results

Hartnell Climate Results. April 2018. Dr. Brian Lofman Dean Institutional Planning, Research and Effectiveness. Natalia Córdoba- Velasquez Director of Institutional Research. Agenda. Definitions Study Facts Demographics Results By Constructs By Items: Stat. Sig. Dif.

diella
Download Presentation

Hartnell Climate Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hartnell Climate Results April 2018 Dr. Brian Lofman Dean Institutional Planning, Research and Effectiveness. Natalia Córdoba- Velasquez Director of Institutional Research

  2. Agenda • Definitions • Study Facts • Demographics • Results • By Constructs • By Items: Stat. Sig. Dif. • Highlights

  3. Definitions • HERI measures the Climate in terms of Constructs • Constructs are designed to capture the experiences and perceptions • Constructs presents a measurement challenge because of their complex and multifacetednature • To measure these broad underlying areas HERI uses Item Response Theory (IRT) to combine individual survey items into global measures that capture these areas.

  4. Definitions • Normalized Mean: Corresponds to the arithmetic mean is computed for each Construct. The constructs have been scaled to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. • Average Percentage: Some constructs had several items from which the highest values in the scale were taken to compute an average percentage.

  5. 2016-17 Diverse Learning Environments Survey STUDENTS- CONSTRUCTS • Campus Climate Sense of Belonging Academic Validation General Interpersonal Validation Institutional Commitment to Diversity Positive Cross-Racial Interaction Negative Cross-Racial Interaction Discrimination and Bias Harassment Conversations Across Difference • Institutional Practices Curriculum of Inclusion Co-Curricular Diversity Activities Navigational Action • Student Learning Outcomes Habits of Mind Integration of Learning Academic Self-Concept Pluralistic Orientation Civic Engagement

  6. 2016 -2017 HERI Faculty Survey FACULTY CONSTRUCTS Teaching Practices Student-Centered Pedagogy Habits of Mind Technology in the Classroom Types of Courses Faculty Teach Teaching Load Research Activities Scholarly Productivity Foci of Faculty Research Faculty Collaboration with Undergraduates on Research • Faculty Satisfaction Workplace Satisfaction Satisfaction with Compensation Satisfaction with Pay Equity and Family Flexibility Overall Faculty Job Satisfaction by Race Overall Satisfaction Sources of Faculty Stress Career-Related Stress Stress Due to Discrimination, by Gender Stress Due to Discrimination, by Race Additional Sources of Stress Faculty’s Perspectives on Campus Climate Institutional Priority: Commitment to Diversity Perspectives on Campus Climate for Diversity Institutional Priority: Civic Engagement Institutional Priority: Increasing Prestige Campus and Departmental Climate Shared Governance Institutional Commitment

  7. STAFF/ADMINISTRATORS CONSTRUCTS Work Environment Supervisors Professional Development • Campus Climate Campus Atmosphere Campus Diversity Staff Perspectives on Campus Climate Campus Community & Diversity: Institutional Priorities Campus Community & Diversity: Staff Perspectives Staff Discrimination or Exclusion Discrimination and Harassment Satisfaction w/ Administrative Responses & Safety on Campus • Staff Satisfaction & Sources of Stress Workplace Satisfaction Workplace & Overall Satisfaction Satisfaction with Work-Life Balance Satisfaction with Benefits & Compensation Sources of Stress

  8. Study Facts

  9. Study Facts

  10. Demographics

  11. Constructs Summary

  12. STUDENTS

  13. TOP 1

  14. TOP 2

  15. FACULTY

  16. STAFF/ADMINISTRATORS

  17. Statistically Sig. Differences

  18. SIG. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GROUPS STUDENTS survey had 322 items evaluated. Out of them, 63 had statistically differences between the FT and the PT students.  20% FACULTY survey had 184 items. Out of them, 41 had statistically significant differences between FT and PT faculty.  22%

  19. ITEMS WITH ST.SIG.DIF – STUDENTS

  20. ITEMS WITH ST.SIG.DIF – FACULTY

  21. Highlights • Faculty and Students have high differences between Full Time vs. Part Time , with over 20% of items showing differences statistically significant. • Most of the aspects with highest ranking for students lay on the Campus Satisfaction Construct. • Faculty ranks highest the line of the profession, and its value for education and teaching. • The campus seem to support diversity and commitment for equally employment practices (staff).

  22. Highlights • Some of the aspects with lower ranking relate to the lack of usage or experience with such services . i.e.: Psychological services. • Part Time students tend to present lower rankings across the several aspects measured. • Part Time faculty has lower ranking across the different items.

More Related