1 / 12

Introduction: Purpose of the T4TLA CoP

T4TLA Community of Practice, Session 2 Collaborative Inquiry Around Implementation of T4T Strategies May 13, 2019.

dhauser
Download Presentation

Introduction: Purpose of the T4TLA CoP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. T4TLA Community of Practice, Session 2Collaborative Inquiry Around Implementation of T4T StrategiesMay 13, 2019

  2. Collaborative Inquiry is a process where a team (or an individual) receives coaching around a challenge identified through reflective dialogue with another team or individual. Through this experience, people typically gain a clearer understanding of a problem or challenge, with new ideas and insights to consider in addressing the issue. • Today’s Collaborative Inquiry will focus on the Implementation of T4T Strategies as identified by teams. Introduction: Purpose of the T4TLA CoP

  3. Collaborative Inquiry: Tone and Tenor • Collaborative Inquiry is an opportunity to utilize a Consultancy Protocol in ways that: • Honor and respect the challenges teams identify and where they are in their work • Provide an opportunity for teams to support one another • Demonstrate positive intentions and active listening to help another person or team solve a critical problem or challenge. • Pose questions and challenge ideas to help a team clarify the stated problem and identify potential solutions to address the challenges it presents

  4. Consultancy Protocol Overview • Consultancy Protocol 1. Teams or individuals pair up with one another and decide which team presents first and second. • 2. The presenting team describes a problem/challenge and any concerns or questions they have while the inquiry team listens and takes notes. When the first team finishes, the inquiry team asks clarifying questions to achieve clarity about the problem or challenge. • 3. In a dialogue mode, the inquiry team raises further questions and/or insights based on the identified challenge. (The presenting team takes notes but does not engage in this dialogue.)

  5. Consultancy Protocol Overview, continued • 4. The presenting team responds to the dialogue heard while the inquiry team listens. The presenting team and inquiry team then engage in a dialogue about the ideas that have been placed on the table. Focus must remain on the challenge identified. • 5. The presenting team reflects aloud on the dialogue and shares any new insights or ideas that may further inform their challenge or task. • 6. Members of presenting team reflect on what was most useful and what could have been more useful about the Collaborative Inquiry Process. • The paired teams then switch roles and repeat the process.

  6. Collaborative Inquiry Pairings • Breakout Room #1: Central Falls, RI; Globe, AZ and Leona, AZ • Breakout Room #2: Indiana Department of Education

  7. Consultancy Process – 20 minute roundsBreakout Room #1 – Central Falls, Globe and Leona • Timing for Protocol • Explanation 3 minutes • Clarification 2 minutes • Collaborative inquiry and discussion 7 minutes • Reflective response and discussion 6 minutes  • Final thoughts 2 minutes • Process then repeats, providing teams with an opportunity to switch roles. • Order of Presenting Teams • Central Falls, RI • Globe, AZ • Leona, AZ

  8. Consultancy Process – 60 minute roundsBreakout Room #2 – Indiana Department of Education • Timing for Protocol • Explanation 5 minutes • Clarification 3 minutes • Collaborative inquiry and discussion 15 minutes • Reflective response and discussion 20 minutes  • Identify Next Steps 12 minutes • Final Thoughts 5 minutes

  9. Problem Statements

  10. Potential Questions for Inquiry Teams • What factors contribute to this challenge being your “front burner” issue? • What is one strategy you’ve identified or developed to address this challenge? • What could you learn from others? What are your primary concerns or questions regarding this challenge? • What resources do you have available? • When you think about meeting this challenge, how will you know if you are successful? • What have you not yet considered in addressing this problem of practice? • What will you take away from today that may help your team respond to this challenge?

  11. Reminder: CoP Session 3 • CoP #3 – Mon. July 22nd – 12:00 – 1:30 p.m. ET • Focus: Sustainability and Scale-up

  12. Kathy Dunne kdunne@wested.org Carol Keirstead ckeirstead@northeastcompcenter.org Andrew Morrill amorril@wested.org Questions?

More Related