1 / 8

Calibration and leak data A. Neilson June 27, 2008

Calibration and leak data A. Neilson June 27, 2008. Curve data. Superimposed data sets from SH and Buck measurements over Curve Ksv (K=.0143), and Curve (9.16e19X^-4.44). Leak through wall. Leak around perimeter of probe. Leak data.

devona
Download Presentation

Calibration and leak data A. Neilson June 27, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Calibration and leak data A. Neilson June 27, 2008

  2. Curve data Superimposed data sets from SH and Buck measurements over Curve Ksv (K=.0143), and Curve (9.16e19X^-4.44)

  3. Leak through wall

  4. Leak around perimeter of probe

  5. Leak data Total leak is the theoretical leakage as a result of both perimeter leak and wall leak. Both are more significant than originally thought! %O2 id the dP across the boundary condition.

  6. 2008-06-11 Curve

  7. Leak back Leak rate 1mm/min Solubility (@ 6.79ul)= 9.6pmol/mm Back leakage = 10pmol/min @ dP=35mm (dP=20-5=15%) Based on theoretical leak it should be roughly 60pmol/min Difference between theoretical and actual is likely due to the complex geometry and actual path length to the sensor

  8. 2008-06-11 Ksv Why do these rates seem so slow? 10ugms should be 100pmol/min basal and 5-10X with FCCP, 1000pmol/min??

More Related