1 / 16

XMM-Newton/ Chandra Cross Calibration with Clusters of Galaxies

XMM-Newton/ Chandra Cross Calibration with Clusters of Galaxies. CXC Calibration Workshop October 25 2007. L. David, J. Nevalainen, M. Bonamente, D. Jerius, P. Zhao, R. Edgar, T. Gaetz, H.L. Marshall, K. Grant, M. Bautz.

derick
Download Presentation

XMM-Newton/ Chandra Cross Calibration with Clusters of Galaxies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. XMM-Newton/ Chandra Cross Calibration with Clusters of Galaxies CXC Calibration Workshop October 25 2007 L. David, J. Nevalainen, M. Bonamente, D. Jerius, P. Zhao, R. Edgar, T. Gaetz, H.L. Marshall, K. Grant, M. Bautz

  2. Plot from the IACHEC Meeting in May comparing MOS, PN, and ACIS spectral fitting results in the 2-7 keV band for a sample of 7 clusters.

  3. Comparison of ACIS derived temperatures in a broad band, a hard band and from the H-like to He-like Fe K alpha line ratio.

  4. Abell 2029 (z=0.0773, kT=8.0 keV)

  5. Sensitivity of Fe line ratio to gas temperature Abell 2029 – 7 temperature simulated spectrum fit to a single temperature model

  6. Residuals in the Abell 2029 spectrum assuming the gas temperature is given by the Fe line ratio (kT=7.9 keV).

  7. Two corrections have been applied to the predictions of the raytrace code since XRCF. Empirical XRCF correction HRMA overlayer of 22A

  8. Depth of the HRMA overlayer based on grating spectra of AGN

  9. Sensitivity of derived cluster temperatures on the depth of the HRMA overlayer with the empirical XRCF correction.

  10. Spectra fitting results with a HRMA effective area model with the XRCF empirical correction and a depth of 15A for the overlayer.

  11. Sensitivity of derived cluster temperatures on the depth of the HRMA overlayer without the empirical XRCF correction.

  12. Spectra fitting results with a HRMA effective area model without the XRCF empirical correction and a depth of 10A for the overlayer.

  13. Spectra fitting results with a HRMA effective area model without the XRCF empirical correction and a depth of 10A for the overlayer. Comparison with XMM-Newton AGN Gratings data

  14. Two corrections have been applied to the predictions of the raytrace code since XRCF. Empirical XRCF correction HRMA overlayer of 22A

  15. The SSD continuum measurement at XRCF vs. predictions from the XRCF version of the raytrace code with different depths for the overlayer.

  16. Things to do  Generate raytrace models for the XRCF version of the HRMA with a range of depths for the overlayer on each shell.  Compare the raytrace predictions with the SSD continuum measurements for each shell.  Determine the depth of the overlayer required to match the SSD continuum measurement for each shell.  Apply the XRCF derived overlayer depths for each shell and the empirical XRCF corrections to the in-flight HRMA effective area model.  Validate the in-flight HRMA effective area model with gratings and cluster data.

More Related