1 / 33

Latest Results from WMAP : Three-year Observations

Latest Results from WMAP : Three-year Observations. Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin January 24, 2007. WMAP Three Year Science Team. Princeton Chris Barnes (-> MS ) Rachel Bean (-> Cornell ) Olivier Dore (-> CITA ) Norm Jarosik [CoI] Eiichiro Komatsu (-> Texas )

Download Presentation

Latest Results from WMAP : Three-year Observations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Latest Results from WMAP: Three-year Observations Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin January 24, 2007

  2. WMAP Three Year Science Team Princeton Chris Barnes (->MS) Rachel Bean (->Cornell) Olivier Dore (-> CITA) Norm Jarosik[CoI] Eiichiro Komatsu (->Texas) Mike Nolta (-> CITA) Lyman Page [CoI] Hiranya Peiris (-> Chicago) David Spergel[CoI] Licia Verde (-> U. Penn) Chicago Steve Meyer[CoI] UCLA Ned Wright [CoI] Brown Greg Tucker UBC Mark Halpern NASA/GSFC Chuck Bennett[PI] (-> JHU) Mike Greason Bob Hill Gary Hinshaw [CoI] Al Kogut Michele Limon Nils Odegard Janet Weiland Ed Wollack

  3. Night Sky in Optical (~0.5nm)

  4. Night Sky in Microwave (~1mm)

  5. A. Penzias & R. Wilson, 1965

  6. 3.5K NOW R. Dicke and J. Peebles, 1965

  7. P. Roll and D. Wilkinson, 1966 D.Wilkinson “The Father of CMB Experiment”

  8. David Wilkinson (1935~2002) • Science Team Meeting, July, 2002 • Plotted the “second point” (3.2cm) on the CMB spectrum • The first confirmation of a black-body spectrum (1966) • Made COBE and MAP happen and be successful • “The Father of CMB Experiment” • MAP has become WMAP in 2003

  9. COBE/DMR, 1992 • Isotropic? • CMB is anisotropic! (at the 1/100,000 level)

  10. COBE to WMAP COBE 1989 COBE Press Release from the Nobel Foundation [COBE’s] measurements also marked the inception of cosmology as a precise science. It was not long before it was followed up, for instance by the WMAP satellite, which yielded even clearer images of the background radiation. WMAP WMAP 2001

  11. CMB: The Most Distant Light CMB was emitted when the Universe was only380,000 years old. WMAP has measured the distance to this epoch. From (time)=(distance)/c we obtained13.73  0.16 billion years.

  12. The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe • A microwave satellite working at L2 • Five frequency bands • K (22GHz), Ka (33GHz), Q (41GHz), V (61GHz), W (94GHz) • Multi-frequency is crucial for cleaning the Galactic emission • The Key Feature: Differential Measurement • The technique inherited from COBE • 10 “Differencing Assemblies” (DAs) • K1, Ka1, Q1, Q2, V1, V2, W1, W2, W3, & W4, each consisting of two radiometers that are sensitive to orthogonal linear polarization modes. • Temperature anisotropy is measured by single difference. • Polarization anisotropy is measured by double difference. POLARIZATION DATA!!

  13. Microwave Sky (minus the mean temperature) as seen by WMAP

  14. WMAP 3-yr Power Spectrum

  15. What Temperature Tells Us Distance to z~1100 Baryon-to-Photon Ratio Dark Energy/ New Physics? Matter-Radiation Equality Epoch

  16. R. Sachs and A. Wolfe, 1967 • SOLVE GENERAL RELATIVISTIC BOLTZMANN EQUATIONS TO THE FIRST ORDER IN PERTURBATIONS

  17. Boltzmann Equation • Temperature anisotropy, Q, can be generated by gravitational effect (noted as “SW” = Sachs-Wolfe) • Linear polarization (Q & U) cannot be generated gravitationally. It is generated only by scattering (noted as “C” = Compton scattering). • Circular polarization (V) would not be generated.

  18. For metric perturbations in the form of: Newtonian potential Curvature perturbations the Sachs-Wolfe terms are given by where g is the directional cosine of photon propagations. • The 1st term = gravitational redshift • The 2nd term = integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect h00/2 (higher T) Dhij/2

  19. CMB to Cosmology Low Multipoles (ISW) &Third Baryon/Photon Density Ratio Constraints on Inflation Models

  20. ns: Tilting Spectrum ns>1: “Blue Spectrum”

  21. ns: Tilting Spectrum ns<1: “Red Spectrum”

  22. News from 3-yr data is… POLARIZATION MAP!

  23. Composition of Our Universe Determined by WMAP 3yr Mysterious “Dark Energy” occupies 75.93.4% of the total energy of the Universe. 76% 4% 20%

  24. Parameter Determination (ML): First Year vs Three Years (w/SZ) (w/o SZ) 2.22 0.127 73.2 0.091 0.954 0.236 0.756 • The simplest LCDM model fits the data very well. • A power-law primordial power spectrum • Three relativistic neutrino species • Flat universe with cosmological constant • The maximum likelihood values very consistent • Matter density and sigma8 went down slightly

  25. Parameter Determination (Mean): First Year vs Three Years (w/SZ) (w/o SZ) • ML and Mean agree better for the 3yr data. • Degeneracy broken! 2.229 0.128 73.2 0.089 0.958 0.241 0.761

  26. Degeneracy Broken: Negative Tilt Parameter Degeneracy Line from Temperature Data Alone Polarization Data Nailed Tau

  27. No Detection of Gravity Waves (yet) • Our ability to constrain the amplitude of gravity waves is still coming mostly from the temperature spectrum. • r<0.55 (95%) • The B-mode spectrum adds very little. • WMAP would have to integrate for >15 years to detect the B-mode spectrum from inflation. r = Gravity Wave Amplitude / Scalar Curvature Fluctuations

  28. What Should WMAP Say About Inflation? (See W.Kinney’s Talk) Hint for ns<1 Zero GW (r=0) The 1-d marginalized constraint from WMAP alone is ns=0.96+-0.02. Non-zero GW The 2-d joint constraint still allows for ns=1.

  29. What Should WMAP Say About Flatness of the Universe? Flatness, or very low Hubble’s constant? If H=30km/s/Mpc, a closed universe with Omega=1.3 w/o cosmological constant still fits the WMAP data.

  30. What Should WMAP Say About Dark Energy? Not much! The CMB data alone cannot constrain w very well. Combining the large-scale structure data or supernova data breaks degeneracy between w and matter density.

  31. Summary • Understanding of • Noise, • Systematics, • Foreground, and • Analysis techniques • have significantly improved from the first-year release. • A simple LCDM model fits both the temperature and polarization data very well. • Tau=0.09+-0.03 • To-do list for the next data release (now working on the 5-year data) • Understand FG and noise better. • We are still using only 1/2 of the polarization data. • These improvements, combined with more years of data, would further reduce the error on tau. • Full 3-yr would give delta(tau)~0.02 • Full 6-yr would give delta(tau)~0.014 (hopefully) • This will give us a better estimate of the tilt, and better constraints on inflation.

  32. What Should WMAP Say About Neutrinos? 3.04)

More Related