1 / 55

Fluorescence: A tool for the study of molecular interactions . (concepts, examples, discussion)

Fluorescence: A tool for the study of molecular interactions . (concepts, examples, discussion) Scope: A. General concepts, probes, protein fluorescence B. Instrumental Methods (SS and lifetime) C. Solute quenching (accessibility) D. Anisotropy (rotational motion)

dean
Download Presentation

Fluorescence: A tool for the study of molecular interactions . (concepts, examples, discussion)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fluorescence: A tool for the study of molecular interactions. (concepts, examples, discussion) Scope: A. General concepts, probes, protein fluorescence B. Instrumental Methods (SS and lifetime) C. Solute quenching (accessibility) D. Anisotropy (rotational motion) E. FRET & LRET & Excimers (proximity) Refs: --J. Lakowicz, “Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy,” Kluwer, 1999 --Molecular Probes Handbook, --Methods in Enzymology, v. 278

  2. JABLONSKI DIAGRAM Transitions between quantized energy levels produce the absorption and fluorescence spectra and vibrational substructure. Consequences: 1. Fluorescence spectrum is red shifted from absorption 2. Mirror symmetry of fluorescence and absorption 3. Excitation spectrum should mimic absorption spectrum

  3. JABLONSKI DIAGRAM The excited state can be deactivated by many processes after the solvent relaxes around the excited molecule. Deactivation processes and (rates): 1. Fluorescence ( ) 2. Solute quenching (kq[Q]) 3. FRET (kT) 4. Everything else (ki) 5. Stokes’ shift

  4. Examples of Fluorophors Fluorescent amino acid residues (F,Y,W) (Intrinsic Fluorophors) Membrane Probes Fluorescent nucleic Acid base

  5. (1,3) 1. Lys reactive; 2, Cys-reactive; 3, Environmentally sensitive 4, pH sensitive; 5, Bright; 6, High polarization Examples of Some Fluorescent Labeling Reagents (2,4,5,6) (1,4,5,6) (2,3,6) (1,3) (1,5,6)

  6. Cys Reagents Lys Reagents R1 = dansyl, rhodamine, fluorescein, etc. R2 = protein (From Molecular Probes Handbook) Examples of labeling reactions Can use an asymmetrical disulfide R1S-SR3 (R3=NbS)

  7. Non-covalent probes Note: 1. Can obtain binding stoichiometry and binding constant 2. Information about hydrophobic pockets

  8. Green Fluorescent Protein: A intrinsic probe with visible fluorescence lex= 475 nm; lem= 515 nm

  9. Actin Titration (20X enhancement) (Leavis & Lehrer, 1974) A Hg-based Cys-specific label/probe RSHg+ + PSH = RSHgSP

  10. Some Fluorescence Applications

  11. Actin 17 tyr, 4 trp (Lehrer & Kerwar, 1972) Protein Fluorescence and Environment L-trp,L-tyr,L-phe fluorescence in water Trp spectrum is environmentally sensitive actin fluorescence: Left: G = native; d = denatured; u = in 8 M urea Right:decomposition into trp and tyr components.

  12. (Lehrer & Fasman, 1966,1967) Lysozyme-(NAG)n inhibitor Interactions Inhibitor Complex changes Trp in active site Acidic quenching groups change proximity to Trp

  13. Buried Trp Exposed Trp Trp accessibility and “solute quenching”

  14. Anisotropy and Motion Excitation with polarized light produces polarized fluorescence. The degree of polarization or anisotropy depends on immobilization.

  15. E = 1 - ( DA/ D) or E = 1- (F DA /F D) FRET and association reactions FRET and Distance Measurements FRET = Förster Resonance Energy Transfer

  16. Intensity Measurements

  17. Steady-state Spectrofluorometer Absorption is an absolute measurement F is a relative measurement. F I0 I A= eCl F ≈ QI0 (1 - 10-A) when A < 0.05, F ≈ QI0A Q = (F AR/FRA)QR

  18. ARTIFACTS At A>2, use front face excitation

  19. Examples of Artifacts 900 excitation:filter effect due to overlap of em with ex. Front face excitation filter effect due to more penetration at 365.

  20. Steady-state Spectrofluorometer Absorption is an absolute measurement F is a relative measurement. F I0 I A= eCl F ≈ QI0 (1 - 10-A) when A < 0.05, F ≈ QI0A Q = (F AR/FRA)QR

  21. Lifetime Measurements

  22. Frequency Domain Time Domain Lifetime Measurements When I/Io = 1/e = 0.37, t = . When = 45o,  = 1/ = 1/2 For 10 nsec,  = 60 MHz

  23. Time Domain vs. Frequency Domain N-acetyl tryptophan amide: an example of a probe with one lifetime

  24. Frequency Domain Sensitivity Frequency range should match lifetime

  25. F0 = 11 + 22 = 5 When + Q, F = 0.5 • 5 + 0.5 • 1 = 3, Therefore, 60% of total F is quenched. For SS, e.g., intensity change could be interpreted as 60% quenching of both, F = 0.5 • 3 + 0.5 • 3 = 3 But lifetime shows that only 1 Trp is quenched by 80%. One trp is v.accessible. With SS can interpret as all partly accessible. Similar problem with FRET. F0 = 5 F = 3 Lifetime data gives more information than intensity data

  26. Collisional Quenching 1. Collisional quenching affects lifetime and intensity, static quenching only affects intensity. 2. Collisional quenching increases with T, static decreases with T. 3. F/Fo = 1/(1+ KQ[Q]), KQ = Stern-Volmer quenching constant, = kqo, kq = collisional constant =  ko=1010 M-1s-1 ( =1)

  27. Collisional Quenching of Trp in Proteins Using Iodide and Acrylamide KQ 6.4 M-1 2.8 M-1 (Zhou, Maeda, Mabuchi, Lehrer, JMB,1998) (Lehrer, BBRC, 1967) Acrylamide quenching of the single Trp  in LMM monomer (o) and filament (•) Selective quenching of Trp fluorescence (intensity) in lysozyme by I- 1. For multitrp proteins can get fractional fluorescence accessibility 2. Appreciable exposure of trp region ofmyosin rod in filament.

  28. Lysozyme-triNAG skatole L-trp (Lehrer, JACS, 1970) Collisional Quenching by Proton Transfer

  29. Anisotropy, r, and Polarization, p For rigid random probes, rmax= 0.4, pmax = 0.5. r depends on the relationship between the lifetime and the motion.

  30. Anisotropy and Rotational Motion Perrin Equation  = lifetime,  = rotational correlation time  = V/RT = M(v+h)/RT

  31. Example of Segmental Motion

  32. Immobilization of a peptide binding to CaM R=FB/FF

  33. Perrin Equation  = lifetime,  = rotational correlation time Steady-state measurements of Anisotropy Example of Immobilization of Probe on tRNA bound to RNA synthetase  = V/RT

  34. Anisotropy Decay Measurements-Time Domain r(t) = ro exp (-t/)

  35. Example:Time Domain Anisotropy Decay of LADH  measured = 33 ns  calculated (0.2g H2O/protein) = 31 ns

  36. Anisotropy Decay Measurement-Frequency Domain 1. At all frequencies, the vertical component has a shorter lifetime so its profile is shifted to higher frequencies. 2. At low frequencies, plenty of time for complete depolarization, so I(ll) = I() 3.. At high frequency the phase shift is maximum for both components.

  37. Is SS value at low frequency, ro at high frequency. Frequency Domain Anisotropy Decay rw = (mll - m )/(mll + 2m)

  38. Simulated Anisotropy Decay for Segmental Flexibility and Protein Rotation (Time Domain)

  39. Mobility of TNS bound to ApoMyoglobin Differential Polarized Phase vs. Time Domain

  40. Uses of anisotropy Measurements 1. Info on size and shape of molecules 2. Info on local probe or segmental motion 3. Binding of labeled small molecule to big molecule. 4. Probe of membrane fluidity. 5. Information for FRET

  41. Proximity via FRET, LRET & Excimers Basics and Examples of FRET

  42. Ro, Critical Transfer Distance = 1 - IDA/ID = 1 - DA/ D

  43. Example: FRET between Trp and Dansyl in Helical Melittin Ro = 23.6A (k2 = 2/3) r = 24,4 A

  44. Distance Distributions A distance distribution analysis might fit better than a 2 or even three lifetime analysis

  45. Distance Distributions and Unfolding

  46. LRET “Luminescence (Detected) Foerster Resonance Energy Transfer” (LDFRET)

  47. LRET Across Actin Filament Tb-chelate Rh-Mal ActinTm structure (Lorenz et al.,1995)

  48. Structure of Tb-chelate A Novel Luminescent Donor Spectra of Cs124 Cs* + Tb  Tb* + Cs NbSSCy-DTPA-Tb-Cs124

  49. Chen,Y & Lehrer (2002) Overlap Between Tb+3 Emission and Rhodamine Absorption TbD* + Rh  Tb +RhA* msec RhA* Rh + h msec Rh*  Rh + h nsec

  50. (Chen &* Lehrer, 2002) msec Decay of Tb directly monitored at 545 nm Indirectly monitored at 565 nm E = 1 - 1.04/1.43 = 0.38 R = Ro[1/E-1]1/6 = Ro(1.63)1/6 R = 61 A

More Related