1 / 13

Wetlands as Water Infrastructure: A South Asian Experience

Wetlands as Water Infrastructure: A South Asian Experience. Missaka Hettiarachchi (Sri Lanka) Jayati Chourey (India). Introduction. Present state of wetlands in South Asia Wetlands are among the least protected ecosystems and are subjected to severe environmental degradation

dayton
Download Presentation

Wetlands as Water Infrastructure: A South Asian Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wetlands as Water Infrastructure: A South Asian Experience Missaka Hettiarachchi (Sri Lanka) Jayati Chourey (India)

  2. Introduction Present state of wetlands in South Asia • Wetlands are among the least protected ecosystems and are subjected to severe environmental degradation • Loosing important environmental services they offer • (Mis)management is the main issue

  3. Case 1:Colombo Flood Detention Area Wetlandsby Missaka Hettiarachchi

  4. Present status (ecological status ) • Water quality highly degraded: BOD – 29.5mg/l, DO – 4.6 mg/l Phos: 0.21 mg/l Fecal coli – 2600 nos/100 ml [Spatial and Temporal mean for the whole system] • Proliferation of invasive species Plants: Pond Apple (Annonaglabra), Water hyacinth (Eichhorniacrassipes). Anonaglabra cover increased by 110% form 1982 -2008Fish: Knife fish, Kissing gourami, Thilapia (Avg. 2 invasive species identified in each plot) Present status (eco-system services) • Earlier: Human consumption, flood attenuation, drainage, agricultural use, transport, fishing • Present: flood attenuation and drainage (serves as the only drainage and flood retention infrastructure in the area)

  5. Problems • Number of small solid waste dumps, two major municipal solid waste dumps. • 89.5% of the households (200m from the wetland); NO sanitary latrine • 52.5% of the households discharge gray water to the marsh • 60% of the households are effected by floods Management Scenario • Owned and managed by SLLRDC (Sri Lanka Land Reclamation and Development Corporation) • No community participation in management or decision making • Involvement of other stake holder organisations (CEA, LGAs) minimal • Function as a major water infrastructure is identified by managers but not properly accounted/ incorporated in development decision making .

  6. by Jayati Chourey Case 2: Kondakarla Ava Wetland, India

  7. Services provided by Kondakarla Ava wetland to the communities Ava supports a population of 25000 in 17 villages Irrigates more than 3000 Ac. of land Inland Fishery Water for washing cloths Fodder and drinking water for cattle Aquatic plants and sediment for various purposes Ground water recharge Ecotourism

  8. Institutional Stakeholders • District Administration • Mandal Revenue Office • Mandal Development Office • Irrigation Dept • Fisheries Dept • Agriculture Dept • Forest Department • Tourism Department • Gram Panchayats • Ava Inland Fishermen Co-operative Society • Ava Water Users Association (WUA) • Lift Irrigation Committees • Washer-folk Society • Cattle rearers’ Society • Women Self Help Group • Youth Organisations

  9. Management Scenario • With a plethora of “stakeholders”, it is difficult to define the rights and responsibilities for each of these groups. conflicts exist at inter and intra village levels among different user groups. • A very common perception here is that wetland degradation is a natural process. None of the user groups has wetland conservation and management as one of its objectives. • There is no common forum, which can coordinate and monitor all the wetland use practices and take up conservation activities.

  10. Problems to Ava ecosystem affecting local livelihoods • Decrease in water holding capacity, reduction in the level and area of water •  Eutrophication and Pollution • Decrease in bird and fish diversity and population • Conflict among user groups Year 2003Year of Misery; Consequence of Unwise Use of Ava. • Ava was fully dried for the first time in its history due to excessive irrigation supplies affecting the livelihoods of several subsistence users • Five local species of fish disappeared • and bird populations reduced by 60%.

  11. Key Messages • Wetlands offer important ecological services and are instrumental in influencing the lifestyle and development of the communities • Economic value of wetlands should be established and they should be understood and treated as water sector infrastructure in development decision making • Present management system appears to be very complex with no linkages between and among different user groups. • A participatory institution for ecosystem based management, comprising all the stakeholders, is the need of the hour.

  12. Thank you Missaka Hettiarachchi : nandalochana@yahoo.co.uk Jayati Chourey : jayati27@rediffmail.com

More Related