1 / 26

spontaneous generation

spontaneous generation. Redi, Needham, Spallanzani, and Pasteur or, “Doesn’t a swan need its OWN neck?”. m. keffer bio 10A november 2005. spontaneous generation. for much of history, people believed that animals could come from non-living sources. this is called abiogenesis

dana
Download Presentation

spontaneous generation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. spontaneousgeneration Redi, Needham, Spallanzani, and Pasteur or, “Doesn’t a swan need its OWN neck?” m. keffer bio 10A november 2005

  2. spontaneous generation • for much of history, people believed that animals could come from non-living sources. • this is called abiogenesis • also known as spontaneous generation

  3. spontaneous generation • for much of history, people believed that animals could come from non-living sources. • this is called abiogenesis • also known as spontaneous generation

  4. spontaneous generation • for much of history, people believed that animals could come from non-living sources. • this is called abiogenesis • also known as spontaneous generation

  5. some odd ideas came down through history • these ideas were followed because people simply accepted what they were told

  6. the power of authority • in the past, people believed what they were told by “authorities” such as the Church, or the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle • questioning Aristotle was like questioning the Church....

  7. one “scientist” put forward the belief that mice could be generated spontaneously from wheat and a sweaty shirt. • the wheat provided the “nutritive power” and the shirt provided the “active principle.” • “active principle” = a mysterious “life-force” that allowed spontaneous generation to occur.

  8. 1668 -- Francisco Redi

  9. Redi’s critics said: • You have excluded AIR • We ALL know that everything needs air • Of course no flies grew! • You haven’t proven anything.

  10. Redi part 2 – answer to critics flies laid eggs on top of mesh no maggots in meat fine mesh allows in air, but not flies

  11. Needham’s experiments -- 1745 • The debate continued. • Needham, 1745, proposed an experiment to once and for all PROVE that spontaneous generation could occur. • Microorganisms were now a hot item. Scientists were able to see protists and bacteria – although they did not have names for them. • They called them “animalcules.”

  12. Needham’s experiment 1745 • Everyone knew that boiling killed organism. • Needham prepared various broths and showed that they contained microbes. • Then he boiled them, and showed that there were no longer any microbes. • He ensured the stoppers were loose, so that air would not be excluded • Then, after a few days, microbes had reappeared! • This was “proof” that the microbes had spontaneously generated from the non-living broth.

  13. Needham’s error • BUT: how was this evidence of a faulty experiment? • what ERROR in experimental method is shown here? • hypothesis: microbes MUST HAVE arisen spontaneously from the broth. • assumption: there is no other place the microbes could come from (other than the broth). • error: • microbes could have come from the air!

  14. spallanzani’s first experiment -- 1745 • argued with Needham • said he didn’t seal jars well enough • He said microbes could have come from the air • he repeated Needham’s experiment, but changed two things: • boiled flasks longer, and • SEALED THEM after boiling by fusing the glass tops shut • (hermetically sealed – absolutely airtight) • result: NO growth in ANY flask

  15. Needham criticizes Spallanzani’s first experiment • BUT Needham said: you boiled it TOO LONG, and: • You spoiled the vegetative power by boiling. • You killed the ability of the broth to give life. • Life canstill come from broth -- but the broth must not be “damaged” by boiling.

  16. Spallanzani’s second experiment tight seal loose seal 30 mins • he did TIMED BOILINGS • then left them partially sealed • some partially sealed, some hermetically sealed as in his previous experiment • hypothesized that more boiling should lead to less life • he left some jars as Needham had (leaky seals), to ensure “active principle” was not damaged 60 mins 90 mins 120 mins

  17. Spallanzani’s second experiment -- results tight seal loose seal 30 mins • this showed TWO main things: • boiling did NOT damage broth’s ability to support life • growth depended on the SEAL only 60 mins 90 mins 120 mins

  18. Pasteur 1859 • used swan-necked flask • flask allowed in air, but trapped dust (and microbes) • boiled infusion • showed that NO growth occurred, even after many days • BUT -- what about damaging the “active principle”?

  19. pasteur • Pasteur showed that the active principle was NOT damaged • at any later time, he could tip the flask • this allowed nutrient broth to contact the dust • this carried microbes into the broth • result: growth! area where dust had been trapped

  20. Pasteur squashes abiogenesis completely • since then, no one has been able to refute Pasteur’s experiment • scientists everywhere soon came to accept that abiogenesis did NOT EXIST. • but: then how did life on this planet start in the first place?

  21. what do we need to have “life”? • Review characteristics of life: • ingest food and create wastes (metabolism) • highly organized chemicals • contain DNA and RNA • react to changes in environment (irritability) • grow and develop • reproduce others like self • what is needed for these things to occur?

  22. what do we need to have “life”? • Review characteristics of life: • ingest food and create wastes (metabolism) digestive enzymes complex proteins amino acids elements C, H, O, N, S

  23. what do we need to have “life”? • Review characteristics of life: • contain DNA and RNA precursor molecules (nucleotides) C, H, O, and N were these present in the early days of the earth?

  24. Miller’s experiment -- 1950s • the early earth’s atmosphere was TOXIC to life as we know it • there was no oxygen gas • but there were: • water vapor (H2O) • methane (CH4) • ammonia (NH3) • hydrogen gas (H2) • these are all non-living • there was also DEADLY LEVELS of ultraviolet (UV radiation) • there was also electricity (lightning)

  25. Miller’s experiment -- 1950s • results: • amino acids • nucleotides • many other organic complex molecules • but no oxygen gas • and no life.

  26. where from here? • is there some way to adapt this experiment to test whether it would be possible to generate “life” from “non-life”?

More Related