1 / 29

Spontaneous Generation vs. Biogenesis Honors Biology

Spontaneous Generation vs. Biogenesis Honors Biology. Aristotle (384 - 322 BC). Proposed the theory of spontaneous generation Also called abiogenesis Idea that living things can arise from nonliving matter Idea lasted almost 2000 years. Early Science.

hung
Download Presentation

Spontaneous Generation vs. Biogenesis Honors Biology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Spontaneous Generation vs. BiogenesisHonors Biology

  2. Aristotle (384 - 322 BC) • Proposed the theory of spontaneous generation • Also called abiogenesis • Idea that living things can arise from nonliving matter • Idea lasted almost 2000 years

  3. Early Science • For centuries, people based their beliefson their interpretations of what they saw going on in the world around them without testing their ideas • They didn’t use the scientific method to arrive at answers to their questions • Their conclusions were based on untested observations

  4. Example of Observations • Observation:Every year in the spring, the Nile River flooded areas of Egypt along the river, leaving behind nutrient-rich mud that enabled the people to grow that year’s crop of food. However, along with the muddy soil, large numbers of frogs appeared that weren’t around in drier times

  5. Example cont… • Conclusion: It was perfectly obvious to people back then that muddy soil gave rise to the frogs

  6. John Needham By 1745 an English scientist used microscopic observations to support the theory of abiogenesis. To test the theory he boiled meat broth for several minutes in a loosely sealed flask. ( allow to cool down the flask) Immediately after boiling he saw under the microscope that the broth had no living things. After a few days he examined the flask and found microrganism.

  7. John Needham Abiogenesis Microorganisms

  8. Disproving Spontaneous Generation

  9. Francesco Redi (1668) • In 1668, Francesco Redi, an Italian physician, did an experiment with flies and wide-mouth jars containing meat

  10. Redi’s Experiment • Redi used open & closed flasks which contained meat. • His hypothesiswas that rotten meat does not turn into flies. • He observedthese flasks to see in which one(s) maggots would develop.

  11. Redi’s (1626-1697) Experiments Evidence against spontaneous generation: 1. Unsealed – maggots on meat 2. Sealed – no maggots on meat 3. Gauze – few maggots on gauze, none on meat

  12. Redi’s Findings • He found that if a flask was closed with a lid so adult flies could not get in, no maggots developed on the rotting meat within. • In a flask without a lid, maggots soon were seen in the meat because adult flies had laid eggs and more adult flies soon appeared.

  13. Did Redi Use the Scientific Method?

  14. LazzaroSpallanzani’s (1765) • Boiled soups for almost an hour and sealed containers by melting the slender necks closed. • The soups remained clear. • Later, he broke the seals & the soups became cloudy with microbes.

  15. Spallanzani’s Results

  16. Conclusion • Critics said sealed vials did not allow enough air for organisms to survive and that prolonged heating destroyed “vital force” • “Vital force” needed to life to form. • Therefore, spontaneous generation remained the theory of the time

  17. Needham 1745 Spallanzani 1765

  18. Louis Pasteur (1822-1895)

  19. Pasteur's Experiment • Hypothesis:Microbes come from cells of organisms on dust particles in the air; not the air itself. • Pasteur put broth into several special S-shaped flasks • Each flask was boiled and placed at various locations

  20. Pasteur's Experiment - Step 1 • S-shaped Flask • Filled withbroth • The special shaped was • intended to trap any dust particles containing • bacteria

  21. Pasteur's Experiment - Step 2 • Flasksboiled • Microbes Killed

  22. Pasteur's Experiment - Step 3 • Flask left at various locations • Did not turn cloudy • Microbes not found • Notice the dust that collected in the neck of the flask

  23. Pasteur's Experimental Results

  24. The Theory of Biogenesis1864 • Pasteur’s S-shaped flask kept microbes out but let air in. • Proved microbes only come from other microbes (life from life) - biogenesis

  25. Review Mr. Velázquez Biology

  26. Evidence Pro and Con • 1668: Francisco Redi filled six jars with decaying meat. Conditions: Results: 3 jars covered with fine net - No maggots 3 open jars - Maggots appeared From where did the maggots come? What was the purpose of the sealed jars? Spontaneous generation or biogenesis?

  27. Evidence Pro and Con • 1765: Lazzaro Spallanzani boiled nutrient solutions in flasks.

  28. Evidence Pro and Con • 1861: Louis Pasteur demonstrated that microorganisms are present in the air.

More Related