1 / 25

Experimental Prospects for CP and T Violation Studies in Charm

Experimental Prospects for CP and T Violation Studies in Charm. Giampiero Mancinelli University of Cincinnati CHARM 2007 – Cornell, USA. Outline. BESIII. CLEO-c. E-791. SUPER-KEK. THE RESEARCH CP Violation in the Charm Sector Direct CP Violation Experimental Techniques

cosmo
Download Presentation

Experimental Prospects for CP and T Violation Studies in Charm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Experimental Prospects for CP and T Violation Studies in Charm Giampiero Mancinelli University of Cincinnati CHARM 2007 – Cornell, USA

  2. Outline BESIII CLEO-c E-791 SUPER-KEK • THE RESEARCH • CP Violation in the Charm Sector • Direct CP Violation • Experimental Techniques • CP/T Violation Searches • Charged D decays • Neutral D decays • CP states • 3-Body • CP Violation at the (3770) • T-odd Correlations • Summary: Current Status • Future Prospects • Conclusions • THE PLAYERS

  3. Charming CP Violation • Sakharov conditions for baryogenesis (1967): • Baryon number violation • CP violation • Non-equilibrium • SM CP Violation in kaon and beauty systems too small • Need other sources • Three types of CP Violation • CPV in mixing matrix (tiny) • CPV in decay amplitudes • CPV in interference between mixing and direct decay, for a subset of final states (mixing suppressed, hence very small) See previous session for CPV in mixing

  4. Direct CP Violation in Decay u u u u s s • Two amplitudes with different strong & weak phases needed to observe CPV (in SM from tree and penguins) • THE DECAYS • Cabibbo Favored (CF) • Singly Cabibbo Suppressed (SCS) • Doubly Cabibbo Suppressed (DCS) 2 weak amplitudes with phase difference strong phase difference e.g. SCS D0 → K+K- u W+ K+ c D0 s K- u W+ K+ c s D0 s Only SCS decays probe penguins K-

  5. CP Violation in the Standard Model • Standard Model charm physics is “CP conserving” • 2x2 Cabibbo quark mixing matrix is real (no CPV at tree level) • CPV in penguins and loops (by virtual b quarks) • Diluted weak phases in SCS decays • In mixing, CPV enters at O(VcbVub/VcsVus) • In decay, penguin CPV enters at O(VcbVub/VcsVusas/p) • No weak phases in CF and DCS decays • …except D+ g K0p+ - SM ~0.003 (CPV in K0 decay) • Note: in general we can separate direct and indirect CP Violation by: • Combine measured ACP with time-dependent CPV measurements (both for CP eigenstates) • Just using time-integrated measurements (assuming negligible new CPV in CF or DCS decays): • The time-integrated CP asymmetry for CF decay to a CP eigenstate gives indirect ACP • e.g: ACP_DIRECT(P+P−) = ACP(P+P−) − ACP(KS0p0) , P = K, p Light readings: New physics and CP violation in singly Cabibbo suppressed D decays. Y. Grossman, A. L. Kagan, Y. Nir, Phys.Rev.D75:036008,2007. “I Know She Invented Fire, But What Has She Done Recently?" - On The Future Of Charm Physics, I.I. Bigi, Int.J.Mod.Phys.A21:5404-5415,2006. Mixing and CP-violation in charm. A. A. Petrov, Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl.142:333-339,2005. A Cicerone for the Physics of Charm, S. Bianco, F. L. Fabbri, D. Benson, I. Bigi, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 26N7 (2003) 1.

  6. CP Violation and New Physics (NP) • Extensions of the Standard Model (ex: SUSY) contain CP violating couplings that should show up at some level (1%?) in flavor physics • Precision measurements and theory are required to detect the NP • BSM Physics: charm isunique probe of the up type quark sector, especially models in which CKM mixing is generated in the up sector • top quarks: do not hadronize • No T0-T0 oscillations • Hadronization helps observability of CP Violation • up quarks : p0, η and η′ do not decay weakly • No p0-p0 oscillations possible • CP asymmetries mostly excluded by CPT theorem) • (relatively) Large statistics • Flavor models where the CKM mixing is “generated” in the up sector predict large D − D mixing and sizable CPV in D, but smaller effects in the B sector • SCS Ddecays are now more sensitive to gluonic penguin amplitudes than are charmless Bdecays CF and DCS decays: Direct CPV in charm would mean NP SCS decays: SM ~ 10-3 from CKM matrix

  7. Experimental Approaches for DCPV • Measure asymmetry in time integrated partial widths • Measure asymmetries in final state distributions on Dalitz plots • Exploit quantum coherence of DD produced in y(3770) decays • Study T-violation in 4-body decays of D mesons (assuming CPT) with triple product correlations (T-odd) • All analyses (except CLEO-c) share many common features • Many D0s produced in colliders, • Easy to determine the flavor of the D0 (by unbiased tag: D* g D0) • Common backgrounds (e.g. Kp) • Random  combining with a real D0gK+- • Multibody D0 decay from D*gD0 • Random Kcombinatoral background • Signal and Background yields taken from mKvs DM(D*-D0) • Signal shape/resolution functions/efficiency calibrations taken from CF modes • p(D*) cut to suppress from BgD*gD decays • Often normalize asymmetries to CF (or other) modes • Keep many systematics to a minimum

  8. D+ → K−K+p+, p-p+p+ K−K+p+ K+K-p- BABAR fp+ fp- ~55000 events 80pb-1 K*0K+ K*0K- K−K+p+ K+K-p- D+ → K−K+p+ D+ → p-p+p+ CDFII 193 pb-1 ~42500 events 80fb-1 m(p-p+p+) Phys. Rev. D71, 091101 (2005) m2(p-p+) Large statistics gives access to detailed features in Dalitz plots m2(p-p+) http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/new/bottom/040422.dplus/

  9. D0g KK, pp - I D0Kp Yield: 180K 123 pb-1 • SM CPV~10-3 in single Cabibbo suppressed modes (KK,pp), but null in Cabibbo allowed (Kp) • BR(D0->KK) >> BR(D0->pp) (R~2.8) – Large FSI and/or penguin contributions • NP CP asymmetries • Standard Model (Buccella et al, 1995) g KK: (0.01 ± 0.08)%, pp: (0.002 ± 0.001)% • CDF II • Use D0Kp as normalization mode D0KK Yield: 16220 200 D0pp Yield: 7334 97 Issues: Tracking charge asymmetry partially reconstructed D background for KK mode Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 122001 (2005)

  10. D0g KK, pp - II • BABAR • Analysis Difficulties: • Precise quantification of asymmetry in D0 flavor tagging • Forward-backward asymmetries in cc production (novel issue) • Interference in e−e+ -> cc as mediated by either a virtual photon or a virtual Z0. • Higher-order QED box- and Bremsstrahlung-diagram interference effects • Can produce asymmetries due to boost of the CMS relative to the lab at asymmetric BABAR • Data corrected for charge-dependent detection efficiencies • By tagging with an independent sample of D0 decays • Systematics: • All corrections used for data will be calculated from data. • Goal: reduce systematics in these measurements to the 0.1% level • Soft-Pion Tagging efficiency corrections calculated from the CF decay (Kp) • With 400 fb-1 we expect: • KK gs(ACP)= ~ 0.3 10-2 (stat.) • ppgs(ACP )= ~ 0.5 10-2 (stat.) • Both results expected to be statistically dominated

  11. CLEO-c’s Measurements New! • At the (3770) • Pure DD final state, no additional particles • Low particle multiplicity • (DD) = 6.4 nb (U(4S)gBB ~ 1 nb) • Single tag sample • Mostly CF modes • High efficiencies 281 pb-1 Uncertainties ~1% most cases Charged Kaon tracking largest syst. ~0.7% SCS

  12. Why Dalitz Plot Analyses? • In case of indirect CPV and final CP eigenstates the time integrated and time dependent CP asymmetries are: • Universal • Equal to each other • In contrast, for direct CPV: • The time-integrated asymmetries are not expected to be universal • Parts of phase-space might have different asymmetries • They may even cancel each other out when integrated over the whole phase-space • New Physics might not show up in the decay rates asymmetries • It could show up simply in the phase difference between amplitudes!

  13. 3-Body Dalitz Plot Analyses - I • 3-Body decays permit the measurement of phase differences • The Dalitz plot technique allows: • Increased sensitivity to CP asymmetry • Probes the decay amplitude rather than the decay rate. • Access to both CP eigenstates (e.g. D00, f00, 00, …) and non eigenstates (e.g. D0+--+, K*+-K-+, …) with relatively high statistics in the modes D0-+0, D0K-K+0, … • As measurements are normalized to the whole phase space, the flavor dependence of ps tagging efficiency is null and the effect of mistagging is very small. • CLEO • D0-+0 - Difference in the integrated coherent sum of all amplitudes across the Dalitz Plot between D0 and D0 events • D0gKS-+ - Full Dalitz analysis (see next slide)

  14. 3-Body Dalitz Plot Analyses - II • BABAR(expect results this Fall) • D0-+0, D0K-K+0 • MODEL DEPENDENT approach: fit D0 and D0 Dalitz plots separately, with a resonance (isobar) model (higher systematic uncertainties) • Parameterize the amplitude coefficients explicitly in the form: A eiδ = a ei(α +β)(1 + b/a) (for D0) • A' eiδ' =a ei(α -β) (1 - b/a) (for D0) • Calculate |b| / |a|,  values, asymmetries in the fit fractions for each isobar. • Follows CLEO’s KSpp analysis technique, (Phys.Rev.D70:091101,2004). • MODEL INDEPENDENT approach: use moments of the cosine of the helicity angle for each of the three channels ( h-h+, h-p0, h+ p0); plot vs invariant mass. • Measure asymmetry in these moments. • The phase/interference information is (mostly) contained in the odd moments • Decay rate asymmetry is contained in the even moments. D0-+0 D0→ρ0π0 b=0 b =0 m2(p-p+) MC m2(p-p+) m2(p-p+) D0→ρ0π0 b=-0.05 b = -5o MC m2(p-p+)

  15. (3770): Quantum Correlation Analysis - I e+e-  (3770)  D0D0 K+ CP(f1 f2) = CP(f1) CP(f2) (-1)l = CP+ K- - - (since l = 1) e- e+ e.g. K+K- DCPy’’(3770)  DCP Ksp0 (-1) l p- + - - = CP+ p+ • At the (3770) (CLEO-c) • 22% double tagging efficiency (~0.1% @ U(4S)) • Same number of DD fully reconstructed as BB @ U(4S) • Unique CPV search strategy • Complementary to other experiments Pure JPC = 1-- initial state g CP+ Quantum Correlation Analysis (TQCA): Due to quantum correlation between D0 and D0, not all final states allowed. If a D0 (tag) decays to a CP eigenstate f1, CP conservation requires the recoiling state f2 to have a definite CP as well, which must be of opposite sign:

  16. (3770): Quantum Correlation Analysis - II <K-p+|D0>/<K-p+|D0> = -re-id New! Improved technique + KL CP+ modes Reconstruct both D mesons (double tag) Forbidden by CP Conservation 281 pb-1 CP+ vs CP+ CP- vs CP- Maximal constructive interference Forbidden (Bose Symm., if no D mixing CP+ vs CP- Interference: Two paths to K-+ vs K+- K-+ vs K-+ Interference of Cabibbo Favored with Doubly Cabibbo Suppressed K-+ vs K+- Unaffected Kvs CP+ Kvs CP- Data favors QC interpretation: constructive and destructive interference and no D mixing Data consistent with no C+ initial state, (s~1.5%, stat dominated) “hence” no CPV cosd = 1.06  0.19  0.06

  17. T Violation: T-odd Correlations Method searches for Triple Product Asymmetries in (e.g.) D0 → K−K+p−p+ T-odd correlations can be formed using the momenta of the decay products (and assuming validity of the CPT theorem): Under time reversal T, CT →−CT. CT<>0 does not necessarily established T-Violation, because FSI can “fake” this asymmetry(*) Consider D0 → K+K-p+p- where we can compute: Finding: establishes T violation. We can build T-odd asymmetries as: And the T-Violation asymmetry as: tests T-Violation even with strong phases Some references: E. Golowich and G. Valencia, Phys. Rev. D 40, 112 (1989) I.I. Bigi, Proceedings of KAON2001, 417 (2001) (*) I.I. Bigi, A.I. Sanda,‘CP Violation’, Cambridge University Press 2000

  18. T-Violation Measurements 370 fb-1 Yield: ~32000 BABAR Preliminary D0 → K−K+p−p+ D0 → KS0K+p−p+ Yield: 828 FOCUS FOCUS

  19. Direct CP/T Violation Results – D0 Decays Partial list New! New!

  20. Direct CP/T Violation Results – D+ Decays New! New! Partial list

  21. Average Result, by Mode SCS modes HFAG + my averages Partial list AT For most references http://hal9000.mib.infn.it/~pedrini/hfag/charm_asymcp.html See the HFAG pages http://hal9000.mib.infn.it/~pedrini/hfag/charm_todd_asym.html

  22. Future Prospects – Current Efforts - I • D0gKK, pp • CDF yield prospects • 2M D* tagged D0Kp per 1 fb-1 • s(ACP) ~ 10-3 is achievable with full Tevatron run (4-9 fb-1) - at SM limit • Issue will be if trigger can cope with Luminosity increase • BABAR: 1 ab-1 • KK s(A)~0.2% (stat) • pps(A)~0.3% (stat) • D+g K+K-p+ • BABAR – now s(A)~0.45 (systematically dominated – (syst~0.8)) • 1 ab-1s(A)~0.28% (stat) • Dalitz Analysis: fit fractions and phase differences ~ 1% and 1o precisions • D0gp+p-p0 Dalitz Analysis • BABAR 200,000 signal events @ 1 ab-1 in 1 mass region. • s(A) (stat) ~ 0.25 % (integrated) • If the asymmetry is larger, but confined to only a part of the phase-space or only to certain specific decay(s), or both (constructively) in amplitude phases and magnitudes, our observation potential might be higher (or lower if destructively)

  23. Future Prospects – Current Efforts - II • T-Odd Correlations • BABAR (KKpp) • now ~ 0.9-0.6% level (if systematics under control) • 1 ab-1 0.55-0.35% • Relevant datasets I am aware of (larger backgrounds than KKpp): • CLEO: D0gp+p-p+p- 7,300 - D0gp+p-p0p0 2,700 – D+gp+p-p+p0 5,700 • BABAR: D0gp+p-p+p- - current ~140,000 – 1 ab-1 ~320,000 • + many large CF decays datasets from all 3 experiments • NOTE: Expect similar yields/results from BELLE

  24. Future Prospects – Future Efforts • BEPCII/BESIII • Data taking beginning of 2008 - 3 yrs @ 3770 = 30M DD/yr = 90M DD = ~20 times full CLEO-c dataset • Super-B (D, t…) • 10 ab-1/yr at U(4S) • With option to lower energy to ~4 GeV (~1ab-1/yr) • LHCb • Will implement a dedicated D* trigger stream selecting huge and clean samples of hadronic D modes • In one year of running at nominal lumi (2·1032 cm-2s-1): • Expect 250 - 500 M D*  D0pdecays with D0Kp channel = 100 times CDF ! BESIII – SUPER-D-too Factory (KEK and/or Frascati) – LHCb K-K+ A < 0.08 (CLEO-c), < 0.004(BESIII) s(A) ~1 x 10-4 (stat.) LHCb/yr s(A) ~6 x 10-5 (stat.) Super-B/yr • y(3770) Quantum Correlation Analysis A < 0.025 (CLEO-c) s(A) ~0.01 (just KK, pp) (BESIII) • s(A) ~7x 10-4 (stat.) Super-B/yr KSp-p+ Dalitz analysis Super-B (5 years = 50 ab-1) A < 5 10-4

  25. Conclusions • Charm physics provides unique opportunities for indirect search of NP • Theoretical calculation of x, y have large uncertainties • Physics BSM hard to rule out from D0 mixing measurements alone • Observation of (large) CPV grobust NP signal • SCS D decays now more sensitive to gluonic penguin amplitudes than charmless Bdecays • Exciting new results (CLEO, Belle, BABAR): • Total errors ~1% level • BUT far from observation • Now entering the interesting domain • Promising future: • Current experiment ~0.1-0.3% in the • “best” modes • Future efforts (Super-Bs, LHCb, • BESIII) ~ 0.001-0.01%

More Related