1 / 32

Public Health Operational Guidelines for Typhoid and Paratyphoid (Enteric Fever) Case Studies

Public Health Operational Guidelines for Typhoid and Paratyphoid (Enteric Fever) Case Studies. Typhoid and Paratyphoid Reference Group (TRPG) 10 th February 2012 Contact Person: Sarah.addiman@hpa.org.uk. Case study groups. Split into 4/5 groups (colour coded dots on badges)

Download Presentation

Public Health Operational Guidelines for Typhoid and Paratyphoid (Enteric Fever) Case Studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public Health Operational Guidelines for Typhoid and Paratyphoid (Enteric Fever)Case Studies Typhoid and Paratyphoid Reference Group (TRPG) 10th February 2012 Contact Person: Sarah.addiman@hpa.org.uk

  2. Case study groups • Split into 4/5 groups (colour coded dots on badges) • Each group has a facilitator • Group work divided into two sessions, each consisting of two/three cases studies • Groups to:- • Nominate a chair and a note taker • Utilise the new guidance to work through common scenarios • Take the opportunity to systematically work through the scenarios utilising the algorithms at every stage • Discuss and agree on the recommended course of action for case and contact management • Record key discussion points/issues/questions as they arise on the flipchart • Feed back to the main group discussion on particular issues which arose during the group work

  3. Outline of session

  4. Scenarios

  5. Case 89 year old British born lady Resident in a care home for 3 years Has dementia and is doubly incontinent (wears pads: ‘managed’ incontinence) S paratyphi B isolated from a stool specimen sent because of diarrhoea No recent travel On investigation, GP notes reveal microbiologically confirmed paratyphi infection in 1960 Contacts Large care home with catering and care staff from countries where paratyphoid is endemic All staff wear gloves when dealing with incontinence Currently not aware of any staff with symptoms or diagnosed with paratyphoid Other care home residents have occasionally had stools sent for clinical reasons but none with S paratyphi identified Case Scenario 1

  6. Case Scenario 1: • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • 1a) • 1b) • 1c) • Q2. Consider if in risk group? • Action for case • Q3. Travel history? • Q4. Possible source identified? • Action for contacts • Other considerations?

  7. Case IT professional Symptoms of typhoid, confirmed on blood culture Returned from travel to an endemic area 28 days ago Contacts Travelled with his girlfriend, who does not live with him Lives with 3 other men in a flat share (does not want to reveal diagnosis to household contacts). They normally cook for each other and one is a cook Case volunteers in a religious temple where he may occasionally have to undertake food-handling duties Case does not know anyone who has had similar symptoms or who has travelled recently apart from himself and his girlfriend [Parts 2 and 3 on subsequent slides] Case Scenario 2 (Part 1)

  8. Case Scenario 2 (Part 1): • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • 1a) • 1b) • 1c) • Q2. Consider if in risk group • Action for case • Q3. Travel history? • Action for contacts • Q4. Possible source identified • OTHER:see Parts 2 and 3 on the following slides…………

  9. SCENARIO Part 2 Following the warn and inform letter, a member of the household subsequently develops symptoms and typhoid infection is microbiologically confirmed Onset: day 56 post the index case’s return from travel Housemate is not a food handler  what further action to take? Case Scenario 2 (Part 2) • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection?

  10. SCENARIO Part 3 Index case found to still be positive, despite now being asymptomatic Index case was compliant with antibiotics of appropriate sensitivity No other members of household positive on screening  what further action to take? Case Scenario 2 (Part 3) • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection?

  11. Case Scenario 2 (Part 2 & 3): • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • Part 2: For the newly identified case: • 1a) • 1b) • 1c) • Q2. Consider if in risk group • Action for the new case • Q3. Travel history? • Q4. Likely source identified?. • Action for contacts • Part 3:Following on from index case’s positive sample: • Action for index case

  12. Case 8 year old child Symptomatic, confirmed as having s.paratyphi in a blood culture. No travel history No previous history of enteric fever No known contact with case or those with recent travel history or foreign visitors from endemic areas Limited social activity in two weeks prior to illness Contacts Mother had fever onset 11 days after the onset of sons illness: referred to GP for investigation and clinical management. Mother is housewife Case Scenario 3 (Part 1)

  13. Case Scenario 3 (Part 1): • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • 1a) • 1b) • 1c) • Q2. Consider if in risk group. • Action for case: • Q3. Travel history? • Q4. Likely source identified? • Action for contacts: • OTHER: see Parts 2 and 3

  14. SCENARIO Part 2: Mother admitted to hospital overnight with her onset of symptoms commencing 11 days after the onset of symptoms in the index case (child) Her blood culture negative Her screening faecal sample taken by the EHO subsequently found to be positive Due to onset of symptoms for s.paratyphi, more likely to be a secondary case or carrier status Mother does not work, is at home during the day  what further action to take? Case Scenario 3 (Part 2)

  15. Case Scenario 3 (Part 2): • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • PART 2: For the newly identified case: • 1a) • 1b) • 1c) • Q2. Consider if in a risk group. • Action for case • Q3. Travel history? • Action for contacts • Q4. Likely source identified?

  16. SCENARIO Part 3 On further investigation mother admitted to being a child minder due to commence looking after <1 year old the following week Performed the school run and after school care for three children 5, 8 and 10 years in her own home These children had been at the home when the index case (boy) and mother were symptomatic  what further action to take? Case Scenario 3 (Part 3)

  17. Case Scenario 3 (Part 3): • ALGORITHMS • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • Part 3: As a result of new information about risk group: • Q2. Consider if in risk group. • Action for case • Q3. Travel history? • Q4. Likely source identified? • Action for contacts • Other considerations?

  18. Case An individual had a typhoid like illness abroad whilst travelling in an endemic area. He has since fully recovered and returned to the UK. He is not in a risk group. Contacts He did not travel with anyone There are some household contacts, but no-one has symptoms Part 2: What actions would be taken if a stool sample comes back as positive for typhoid? Part 3: What action would be taken if the case reports having antibiotics to treat his infection whilst overseas? He is unsure of the name of the antibiotics. Case Scenario 4a

  19. Case Scenario 4a: • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • 1a) • 1b) • 1c) • Q2. Consider if in risk group: • Action for case • Q3. Travel related? • Action for contacts • . • Q4. Likely source identified • Part 2:. • Part 3:

  20. Case An individual had a typhoid like illness abroad whilst travelling in an endemic area. He has since fully recovered and returned to the UK. He is in a risk group.Works in a restaurant. Contacts He did not travel with anyone There are some household contacts, but no-one has symptoms Part 2: What actions would be taken if a stool sample comes back as positive for typhoid? Part 3: What action would be taken if the case reports having antibiotics to treat his infection whilst overseas? He is unsure of the name of the antibiotics. Case Scenario 4b

  21. Case Scenario 4b: • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • 1a) • 1b) • 1c) • If sample returns as positive: • Q2. Consider if in risk group: • Action for case: • Q3. Travel related: • Action for contacts: • OTHER:

  22. Case Scenario 4c • Work risk assessment • Risk assessment performed at the restaurant by the environmental health team. • Restaurant is in a different Borough to where the case resides. • Decision taken that the case cannot be redeployed and will require exclusion • Part 4: Who will exclude the case? • How will the process be managed (formally and informally)?

  23. Case Scenario 4c: • Informal action: • Formal action:

  24. Case Trainee cook returns from travel to an endemic area 28 days ago with ongoing symptoms of typhoid. Presents to GP, and a blood culture confirms typhoid. He has been cooking at a local restaurant, including whilst symptomatic. Contacts Case lives with 12 other men in a halls of residence: kitchen and bathroom facilities are shared Case does not want to reveal his diagnosis to his household contacts but advises that some of his friends are also working in the catering industry. He has been regularly cooking for his friends, 3 of which live in the halls of residence but 4 of which often dine with him but live in other residences. He also stays with his family at weekends who live elsewhere. Not aware of anyone else who has similar symptoms. Case Scenario 5

  25. Case Scenario 5: • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • 1a) • 1b) • 1c) • Q2. Consider if in risk group: • Action for case • Q3. Likely to be travel related: • Action for contacts • Q4. Likely source identified?

  26. Case Confirmed typhoid in a individual who travelled within 28 days of onset. Works as a surgeon, and operates on immuno-compromised patients He was at work whilst symptomatic Occupational Health at the hospital where he works insists he should be excluded but he insists he can be redeployed doing admin duties. Contacts Unclear from initial notification whether he travelled alone Case Scenario 6a

  27. Case Scenario 6a: • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • 1a) • 1b) • 1c) • Q2. Consider if in risk group: • Action for case • Q3. Likely to be travel related? • Action for contacts • Q4. Likely source identified?

  28. Case Confirmed typhoid in a individual who travelled within 28 days of onset. Case works as a nursery nurse and was at work whilst symptomatic Nursery nurse role involves handling food for small children. Contacts Unclear from initial notification whether she travelled alone Case Scenario 6b

  29. Case Scenario 6b: • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • 1a) • 1b) • 1c) • Q2. Consider if in risk group: • Action for case • Q3. Likely to be travel related: • Action for contacts • Q4. Likely source identified?

  30. Case Scenario 7 • Case • 30 year old man, unemployed and sometimes homeless • Confirmed typhoid, acute symptoms • Lived in an endemic area for number of years prior to entry to UK 7 years ago. No travel abroad since. • Does not admit previous history of enteric fever • Heavy drinker of alcohol, spends most of time on street corners drinking and has developed renal failure. • Eats mainly take-away (although some query regarding this, as he is known to be destitute). • Not compliant with outpatient treatment • Contacts • Has stayed in several locations including homeless hostel but minimal contact with hostel residents • No known other cases linked to hostel • Difficult to identify any contacts let alone those with a travel history

  31. Case Scenario 7: • ALGORITHMS • Q1a) is this a possible, probable or confirmed case of enteric fever? • 1b) is the case symptomatic? • 1c) is the case aware of anyone else with the same symptoms • Q2. • Is the case in a risk group or do they undertake risk activities? • Q3. • Is the infection likely to be travel-related? • Q4. • Does the initial risk assessment identify the likely source of infection? • Public health risk assessment and management • 1a) • 1b) • 1c) • Q2. Consider if in risk group • . • Action for case • Q3.Travel history • Action for contacts • Q4. Possible source identified • Other considerations?

  32. Prepared by the secretariat on behalf of the Typhoid and Paratyphoid Reference Group TRPG Membership:

More Related