1 / 24

Strategies for Enhanced Dual Failure Restorability with Static or Reconfigurable p -Cycle Networks

Strategies for Enhanced Dual Failure Restorability with Static or Reconfigurable p -Cycle Networks. International Conference on Communications (ICC) Paris, France - June 22, 2004 Dominic A. Schupke* Siemens AG, Corporate Technology Otto-Hahn-Ring 6, 81730 Munich, Germany E-mail:

connor
Download Presentation

Strategies for Enhanced Dual Failure Restorability with Static or Reconfigurable p -Cycle Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strategies for EnhancedDual Failure Restorabilitywith Static or Reconfigurablep-Cycle Networks International Conference on Communications (ICC)Paris, France - June 22, 2004 Dominic A. Schupke*Siemens AG, Corporate TechnologyOtto-Hahn-Ring 6, 81730 Munich, GermanyE-mail: Wayne D. Grover, Matthieu ClouqueurTRLabs and University of Alberta7th Floor, 9107 116 St NW, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2V4E-mail: {grover,clouqueur}@trlabs.ca *Results from work at Technische Universität München and TRLabs

  2. Outline • Introduction • The p-Cycle Concept • p-Cycles and Dual Failures • Network Design • Results • Conclusions

  3. Introduction Preconfigured protection cycles (“p-cycles”): • Applicable in many kinds of networks • High capacity-efficiency • Fast protection switching times • For span-protection:100% restorability against any single span failure Our focus: • Provide enhanced or optimized levelof dual-failure restorability • Static and reconfigurable p-cycles

  4. A p-cycle in a mesh network: The p-Cycle Concept A B C E D

  5. On-cycle link failure: The p-Cycle Concept A B C E D

  6. Straddling link failure: The p-Cycle Concept A Straddling link B C Path 1 E D

  7. Straddling link failure: The p-Cycle Concept A Path 2 B C E D

  8. Assumptions on Dual Failures • Dual failure scenarios: • Assumption: t1 + t1,rec.< t2 • p-Cycles: trec. ~ 50 ms t1 t1+t1,rec. t2 t2+t2,rec. t1+t1,rep. t2+t2,rep. Recovery fromfirst failure Repair offirst failure Repair ofsecond failure Recoveryfrom second failure (if possible) Second failure First (span)failure

  9. Static p-Cycles and Dual Failures t1 A B C E D

  10. Static p-Cycles and Dual Failures t1 A t2 B C E D No recovery for B-C from second failure

  11. Static p-Cycles and Dual Failures t1 A B p-Cycle A C p-Cycle B E D

  12. Static p-Cycles and Dual Failures t1 A B p-Cycle A C t2 p-Cycle B E D Recovery from second failure

  13. Susceptibility Concept • p-Cycle susceptible to a dual failure combination:Both failures affect working spans protected by it • p-Cycle protects s working spans Susceptible tos (s-1) failure events • Susceptibility s per p-cycle not larger than given σmax • Restrict when selecting eligible p-cycles for design Other approach: • Failure dispersal concept (see paper)

  14. Reconfigurable p-Cycles and Dual Failures t1 A B C E D

  15. Reconfigurable p-Cycles and Dual Failures t1 A B C Vulnerableprotectioncapacity E D

  16. Reconfigurable p-Cycles and Dual Failures t1 A B C Vulnerableworkingcapacity E D

  17. Reconfigurable p-Cycles and Dual Failures t1 A B C • p-Cycle formed • after t1 E D

  18. Reconfigurable p-Cycles and Dual Failures t1 A t2 B C • p-Cycle formed • after t1 and • before t2 E D Recovery from second failure

  19. Network Design Cost-optimal design: • Length-weighted utilization of network Single-failure restorability: • 100% restorability guaranteed Dual-failure restorability: • R(i,j): Restorable fraction of affected working capacity after dual failure of spans i and j • R2: Average over all dual failure cases

  20. Network Design

  21. Hypothetical pan-Europeanoptical network ofCOST239 project Traffic matrix modifiedto lightpath entries Average nodal degree: dav= 4.7 Three-connected(connected after anydual span failure) COST239 Case Study Network

  22. Results for Static p-Cycles Reconfiguration 0.9 =4 σ max 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 smaller Additional Relative Spare Capacity Cost σ 0.4 max 0.3 =9 σ 0.2 max 0.1 =13 σ max 0 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Dualfailure Restorability

  23. Results for Reconfigurable p-Cycles 3 Vulnerable workingcapacity protected only Only additional p-cycles 2.5 2 Relative Spare Capacity Cost 1.5 Fraction of p-cycleschangeable in form 100% 5% 0% 1 ReconfigurationR2=100% Static 0.5 0

  24. Conclusions Capacity design methods: • Static p-cycles: • Improved dual-failure restorability • Susceptibility viable approach to control restorability • Reconfigurable p-cycles: • Complete dual-failure restorability • Different operational options Outlook: • Reconfigurable p-cycles in networks designed for single-failure restorability only • Multiple protection classes

More Related