Monitoring indicators for cultural world heritage sites
Download
1 / 28

Monitoring Indicators for Cultural World Heritage sites - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 99 Views
  • Uploaded on

Monitoring Indicators for Cultural World Heritage sites. ICOMOS Discussion points. Periodic Reporting Process. Periodic Reporting for Europe & North America has highlighted the need to: monitor progress and changes over time in WHSs

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Monitoring Indicators for Cultural World Heritage sites' - conner


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Monitoring indicators for cultural world heritage sites

Monitoring Indicators for Cultural World Heritage sites

ICOMOS Discussion points

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Periodic reporting process
Periodic Reporting Process

  • Periodic Reporting for Europe & North America has highlighted the need to:

    • monitor progress and changes over time in WHSs

  • In the Guidance for Part II of the Periodic Reporting process, the main aim is said to be:

    • … “to obtain an assessment of whether the World Heritage value(s) for which a property was inscribed on the World Heritage list is(are) maintained over time.’

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


New operational guidelines
New Operational Guidelines

‘common elements of an effective management system could include ….a cycle of planning, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and feedback”  

And asks State Parties to include in nominations:

  • “key indicators proposed to measure and assess the state of conservation of the property, the factors affecting it, conservation measures at the property,

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Sites are inscribed on the WH list if they:

  • Are of OUV

  • Have a Statement of OUV

  • Have Authenticity and Integrity

  • Have a Management Plan or Management System that:

    • Identifies threats & vulnerabilities

    • Puts in place processes to:

      • Sustain OUV

      • Monitor & evaluate success in sustaining OUV

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


What needs monitoring
What needs Monitoring

  • Monitoring is needed to show if OUV is being sustained

  • To monitor OUV we therefore need to monitor management processes to see how successful they are

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Cultural WHSs

  • Sites are living evolving places

  • Management is part of daily practice

  • Carried out by a wide range of stakeholders

  • Often with no overall management system

  • Collaborative or traditional management set out in a Management Plan

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


  • For some cultural sites there are a few clear management objectives related to projects

    • Where there is a defined output and timescale

      • e.g. major conservation projects

      • Construction of visitor facilities

  • For majority of cultural sites

  • Mangement challenges are related to managing change on a daily basis

  • Dont know what threat may arrive tomorrow

  • Need to have responsive management

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Managing change: objectives related to projects

  • Involves multiple stakeholders

  • Plethora of smallscale projects

  • Decisions to guide direction of change

    • Avoid unwanted consequences

    • Deliver optimum benefits

  • Through responsive processes

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Action plans in Management plans for cultural sites often include:

  • Production of strategies e.g.

    • Visitor management

    • Risk preparedness

    • Tall buildings

    • Use of local materials

    • Training of craft skills

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


  • Where things go wrong include:

  • Often because lack of process to deal with threats

  • Threats may be related to complex socio-economic systems

  • Need to set site into wider context

  • Manage interaction with its setting

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Invovlement of stakeholders is essential in most cultural sites

  • Includes local communites

  • May include indigenous populations

  • Young people

  • Should be multi-disciplinary

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Management needs to be related to knowledge sites

  • Of OUV

  • How this is related to tangible attributes

  • Of processes that drive the site

  • Of people involved in it

  • Of intangible values

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Monitoring
Monitoring sites

  • For living, developing, cultural sites

  • Monitoring needs to be on-going & responsive

  • Monitoring that reports impacts of change – positive, negative, neutral – valuable

  • More valuable are ways of showing how successful management has steered things in right direction

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


  • Cultural sites more complex than many natural sites sites

    • Where there are clear objectives to be acheived over time

    • Success can be tracked by managers who have some direct control over the process

  • Limitations of ‘tracking’ process

    • activites relating to people, local communities, visitors, management planning

  • All of these relate to cultural sites

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Careful to avoid to simple objectives in order to have measurable indicators

  • Can have sites where fabric is well managed

    • No involvement of local communities

    • Threats to setting

    • Erosion of sense of place

    • Lack of benfits to locals

    • Heritage seen as stopping development

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Indicators
Indicators measurable indicators

Most cultural sites

  • Managed locally

  • Within a national protective framework

  • Both of these need to be in place

  • Need indicators for both

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Monitoring indicators
Monitoring Indicators measurable indicators

Quantative

  • National protective framework

  • Basic data – similar to natural sites

    Qualitative

  • Success of local responsive management

  • Measuring process not the product

  • The product - sustaining OUV

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Qualitative indicators
Qualitative Indicators measurable indicators

  • Such indicators have not yet been developed

  • Three site managers in the UK are curtrently working on this

  • Will set out what indicators need to address

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Qualitative indicators1
Qualitative Indicators measurable indicators

  • Pre-conditions for good management:

    • People

    • Values

    • Knowledge

  • Sustainable management processes

  • Clear agreement on shared benefits

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


People: measurable indicators

  • Management structure

  • Collaborative arrangements

  • How are stakeholders involved

  • Local communities

  • Indigenous people

  • Young people

  • Professional advice: expertise

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Values: measurable indicators

  • Articulating OUV

  • What it relates to on the site

    • Tangible

    • Intangible

  • Other values

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Knowledge: measurable indicators

  • Context for management – wider environment

  • Inventories

  • Conservation records

  • Traditional skills

  • Know-how

  • Oral knowledge/traditions

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Sustainable management: measurable indicators

  • Decison making processes

    • National support

  • Supportive strategies

  • Harnessing opportunties

  • Conservation & preventative conservation processes

  • Fostering development

  • Deal with threats

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Sustainable management: measurable indicators

  • Overall strategies

  • Involvement of major external funding agencies

  • Resources

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Benefits: measurable indicators

Sustaining OUV can bring direct and indirect benefits

To local communities, visitors etc

  • Who benefits

  • How do they benefit

  • Who chooses

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Monitoring indicators for cultural whss
Monitoring Indicators for Cultural WHSs measurable indicators

 Quantative:

  • Suite of indicators – some pre-filled

    Qualitative:

  • People 7

  • Values 4

  • Knowledge 6

  • Sustainable management 9

  • Benefits 2

  • Total: 28

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


Thank You! measurable indicators

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year


ad