1 / 45

Horst Kächele Short or Long Term Psychoanalytic Therapies

Horst Kächele Short or Long Term Psychoanalytic Therapies. Moscow 2008. Time for Psychotherapy. H ow much time (sessions / weeks) is provided in experimental treatment research and H ow much time is provided for whom in which form of treatment in naturalistic settings ? and

Download Presentation

Horst Kächele Short or Long Term Psychoanalytic Therapies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Horst KächeleShort or Long Term Psychoanalytic Therapies Moscow 2008

  2. Time for Psychotherapy How much time (sessions / weeks) is provided in experimental treatment research and How much time is provided for whom in which form of treatment in naturalistic settings ? and Does it make a difference ?

  3. Duration of Experimental Randomized Controlled Treatment Studiesbased on Grawe et al. 1994 Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies • 429 Studies, mean length 11,2 sessions • 434 Studies, mean. length 7, 9 weeks Humanistic Therapies • 70 Studies, mean. length 16,1 sessions • 76 Studies, mean. length 11, 6 weeks Psychodynamic Therapies • 82 Studies, mean. length 27,6 sessions • 80 Studies, mean. length 30,7 weeks

  4. Psychoanalytic Therapies in RCTs (Leichsenring 2004) # Affective disorders (ICD-10 F3) # Anxiety disorders (ICD-10 F40-42) # Adaptive disorders (ICD-10 F43) # Dissociative, somatoforme disorders (ICD-10 F44, F45, F48) # Eating disorders (ICD-10 F50) # Psychic and social factoren in somatic disorders (ICD-10 F54) # Personality- and behavioral disorders (ICD-10 F6) # Dependency (ICD-10 F1, F55)

  5. Consumer Reports Study 1 • US-Survey on satisfaction with treatment • Kind of therapy • Kind of therapist • Problems leading to therapy • Duration and frequency • Emotional state before and after therapy • Improvements in which part of life • Satisfaction with treatment • Kotkin, M., C. Daviet, et al. (1996). "The Consumer Reports Mental Health Survey." American Psychologist51: 1080-1082.

  6. Consumer Reports Study 2 • Scales values from 0 to 100 • A) Special improvement • B) Satisfaction with therapist • C) Global improvement • Total score feasible between 0 - 300 • Main finding: • Total scores correlates with duration of treatment • ( Sample size N= 2.846)

  7. Consumer Reports Study 3

  8. German Study on Effectiveness of Psychotherapy and Patients´ SatisfactionI • Hartmann & Zepf (Saarbruecken) perform another replication of the CR Study using the translated CR questionaire and ADVERTISING the study through a Consumer Journal • Hartmann, S. and S. Zepf (2003) • Effectiveness of Psychotherapy - A Replication of the Consumer-Reports-Study. • Psychotherapy Research13: 235-242.

  9. German CR Study IIEffectiveness & Treatment Modality

  10. German CR Study IIIDuration and Effectiveness

  11. German CR Study IVDuration more than two years • Psychoanalytic Therapy 74% • Psychodynamic Therapy 50% • Client-Centered Therapy 42% • Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy 29%

  12. German CR Study VFindings • Clear cut influence of duration on consumer rated outcome • The first significant improvement of effectiveness after 7 months, the second after one year, and a highly significant improvement after two years. • Methodical problems reside in sampling

  13. IPTAR Study of the Effectiveness of Psychoanalytic PsychotherapyAims1. What is the influence of duration on effectiveness2. What is the influence of frequency on effectiveness3. What is the influence of duration and frequency on the therapeutic alliance4. Is there an interaction between clinical syndrome and duration, frequency and effectiveness

  14. Sample: Patients of the IPTAR Treatment Center New YorkMethod: ConsumerReports QuestionaireReturn rate: from 240 distributed questionaires (only) 99 were returned (41% rate of participation): • IPTAR • Sample and Method

  15. IPTARDuration and Effectiveness

  16. IPTARFrequency and Effectiveness

  17. Berlin Jungian Psychoanalysis Study ICharacteristics of follow-up sample

  18. Berlin Jungian StudyDuration and outcome(Global improvement based on three scales)

  19. The JAMA Meta-Analysis • Leichsenring, F. and S. Rabung (2008). • Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. A meta-analysis. • JAMA, October 1, 2008, Vol 300, No. 13.

  20. Results According to comparative analyses of controlled trials, LTPP showed signifi- cantly higher outcomes in overall effectiveness, target problems, and personality functioning than shorter forms of psychotherapy. With regard to overall effectiveness, a between-group effect size of 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-3.4) indicated that after treatment with LTPP patients with complex mental disorders on average were better off than 96% of the patients in the comparison groups (P = .002). According to subgroup analyses, LTPP yielded significant, large, and stable within-group effect sizes across various and particularly complex mental disorders (range, 0.78-1.98). Conclusions There is evidence that LTPP is an effective treatment for complex mental disorders. Further research should address the outcome of LTPP in specific mental disorders and should include cost-effectiveness analyses.

  21. Structural Change How can we measure „structural change“? What is the difference between symptomatic and structural change? Scales of Psychological Capacities (Wallerstein 1991) Heidelberg Structural Change Scale (Rudolf et al. 2000) Adult Attachment Interview (Main 1989)

  22. Adult Attachment Interview • AAI measures mental representations with respect to present status of attachment. • Levy, K. N., K. B. Meehan, et al. (2006). • Change inattachment patterns and reflective function in a randomized control trial of Transference-Focused Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. • J Con Clin Psychol74: 1027-1040.

  23. The German DPV-Follow-Up Study • Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Stuhr U, Rüger B, Beutel M (2003) • How to study the quality of psychoanalytic treatments and their long term effects on patients well-being. A representative multiperspective follow-up study. • Int J Psychoanal 84: 263-290

  24. German DPV-Follow-Up Study • In the sample of 400 analytic patents • Length of treatment around 4 years • No difference between low frequency (1-2) and high frequency (3-4) in psychometric data at follow-up (6 years) • The authors claim: • if the indication is made properly than both forms of treatment are successful.

  25. Differences between psychoanalyses and long term analytic psychotherapies # Both forms of treatment lead to long time stable results in the majority of patients, if the indication was properly done: # self reflection and the internalization of the analyst were more comprehensive in analytic patients , the evaluation of achieved outcomes more differentiated, and the development of creative ressouirces more innovative. Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Target M (Eds) (2002) Outcomes of Psychoanalytic Treatment Perspectives for Therapists and Researchers. Whurr Publishers,, London and Philadelphia,

  26. Clinical Prototype-Formation Capacity for relationship Capacity to work - Creativity Self reflection (2002, S.130)

  27. The Eight Clinical Prototypes Type 1: „well done... The really good ones“ Type 2: succesful, but why,?..the unreflecting successful ones Type 3: with success and little capicity for reflection, but socially well integrated...“ Type 4: the tragic ones, that were able to accept their lot „ Type 5: „..professionally successful and creativ, but still alone...“ Type 6: „successful within limits in their creativity and capacity to work but with clear limits...“ Type 7: „...therapy didn´ t do any good.. “ Type 8: „ the severly traumatized people“

  28. Clusteranalytic Identification of Sub-groups Sub-group 1: the therapeutically successful with focus on satisfaction with health, but with a common suffering from sexuality Sub-group 2: the therapeutically successful with focus on diffuse satisfaction Sub-group 3: the still suffering, that are only satisfied on the average Sub-group 4: the therapeutically successful with focus on financial satisfaction Sub-group 5: the totally satisfied Sub-group 6: the still suffering unsatisfied Sub-group 7: the extrem group of less successful of all Stuhr et al. (2002, p.154)

  29. Measuring Structural Change with Wallerstein´s Scale of Psychological Capacities The Munich Psychotherapy Study: Huber D, Klug G (2003) Contributions to the measurement of mode-specific effects in long-term psychoanalytic therapy. In: Richardson P, Kächele H, Renlund C (Eds) Research on Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy with Adults. London, Karnac

  30. Groups • Psychoanalysis • 3 x weekly • couch • > 240 sessions • Psychodynamic Psychotherapy • 1 x weekly • sitting • 80-120 sessions • Behavior-Therapy • 1 x weekly • sitting • 25-80 sessions

  31. Correlations of change parameters with duration (month) and dose (total session numbers) • No final data analysis available, CAVE so far: • Scales of Psychological Capacities: • Pre -> corr. with duration = .33 • BSS socialcomm. Pre -> corr. with dose = .37 • All other change parameters do not correlate at no time point with either duration or nor dose

  32. The Heidelberg-Berlin StudyChange of Structure Scale Grande T, Rudolf G, Oberbracht C, Jakobsen T, Keller W (2003) Investigating structural change in the process and outcome of psychoanalytic treatment - The Heidelberg-Berlin Study. In: Richardson P, Kächele H, Renlund C (Hrsg) Research on Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy with Adults. London, p. 35-62

  33. A Swedish point of view: Symptomatic change indicates structural change!!!! Sandell, R. (2005) Structural change and its assessment. Experiences from the Stockholm Outcome or Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy Project (STOPPP). In P. Giampieri-Deutsch Psychoanalysis as an empirical, interdisciplinary science. Collected Papers on Contemporary Psychoanalytic Research. Vienna, Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, pp 269-284.

  34. The Stockholm Outcome of Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis (STOPP) Study

  35. STOPP SCL-90 Global Severity Index (GSI)

  36. Therapists´ Attitude • Sandell R, Lazar A, Grant J, Carlson J, Schubert J, Broberg J (2007) • Therapists' attitudes and patient outcomes: II Therapist attitudes influence change during treatment. • Psychother Res 17: 201-211

  37. STOPP Therapists´ factors

  38. Treatment result trajectories of the General Symptom Index among therapists in the STOPP-Project. Individual trajectories of 219 therapists

  39. Treatment result trajectories of the General Symptom Index among therapists in the STOPP: Latent class model.

  40. Treatment results: trajectories of the General Symptom Index among therapists in the STOPPP. • Mean trajectory

  41. Norcross & Lambert, 2006

  42. Consequences Interaction of therapist style and treatment intensity ? Should treatment intensity influence therapist style ? Answers open for discussion !!!!!!

  43. Frequency as battle ground • „on the one hand, the frequency of sessions is viewed as a variable dependent on the optimal combination of structuring, confrontation, and assimilation, but on the other hand, once settled it takes on the character of an independent variable, that is it becomes part of the setting and an object on which conflicts in the relationship can crystallize“ • (Thomä & Kächele Tom 1) • Sovremenny psikhoanaliz Tom 1. Teoria. Progress, Moskva 1997 • Sovremenny psikhoanaliz. Tom 2. Praktika. Progress, Moskva 1997

  44. Go to: www.horstkaechele.de

More Related