1 / 40

ALLERGEN SPECIFIC IMMUNOTHERAPY: EFFICACY & NEW DEVELOPMENTS

ALLERGEN SPECIFIC IMMUNOTHERAPY: EFFICACY & NEW DEVELOPMENTS. Prof. Dr. Nerin N Bahçeciler Önder Near East University Hospital Division of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology , Nicosia , Cyprus. Montenegro, 2017. Flow. Efficacy – META-ANALYSES /PP / GUIDELINES

Download Presentation

ALLERGEN SPECIFIC IMMUNOTHERAPY: EFFICACY & NEW DEVELOPMENTS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ALLERGEN SPECIFIC IMMUNOTHERAPY: EFFICACY & NEW DEVELOPMENTS Prof. Dr. Nerin N BahçecilerÖnder Near East UniversityHospital Division of PediatricAllergy & Immunology, Nicosia, Cyprus Montenegro, 2017

  2. Flow • Efficacy – META-ANALYSES /PP / GUIDELINES • Immunologicalmechanism • Long-termefficacy • SCIT or SLIT? Clinicalstudies • Tablet /drop / injection ?? • IT in polysensitizedpatient • New developments • Conclusions

  3. META-ANALYSES: • Asthma / AR • Seasonal / Perreniel • CLINICALLY EFFICIENT

  4. SCIT:Long-termEfficacy PAT (PreventiveAllergyTreatment) Aim: Does SCIT prevent development of ASTHMA in children with AR sensitized to pollens? Duration::3 yrs Method: randomized 208 AR children -92 Controls -97 SCIT Moller et al. JACI, 2002

  5. PREVENTED DEVELOPMENT OF ASTHMA

  6. IMPROVEMENT IN ARC SYMPTOMS

  7. Prospective open controlled Drug ANNUALLY SMS Prick test PC20 Nasal Eo HDM+ AR/Asthma Adults f/up 15 years 3 y 4 y SLIT 5 y J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010:126:969.

  8. Symptom-Medication Scores long-termefficaywith > 4 yrstreament

  9. % of patients with ≤1 new sensitization preventsnewsensitizations in long-term

  10. Durham RS et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012:129:717.

  11. SMS during pollen season

  12. Persistence of immunological tolerance • Long-termefficacy of SLIT Tablets • Clinicalparameters • Immunologicaltolerance

  13. SCIT or SLIT? Head-to-head comparison Few studies comparing • Efficacy? Adult / children • Safety • Long-term efficacy? • Immunological mechanisms?

  14. Comparableefficacy

  15. Keles S,Bahceciler NN.J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128(4):808.

  16. Steroid sparing & asthma attacks Keles S,Bahceciler NN.J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128(4):808.

  17. SCIT vs SLIT:Differences in immunulogic mechanism INCREASE IN SLIT : IL-10, TGF-b SCIT : IL-10, TGF-b, IgG4 Keles S,Bahceciler NN.J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128(4):808.

  18. Improvement in SMS with 2 yrs SLIT & SCIT

  19. Improvement in nasal provocation

  20. Comparison of Il-10 & specific IgG4 responses • Bothincrease IL-10 • Increase in IgG4 lessandlater in SLIT

  21. ASTMA / AR SMS SCIT comparable SLIT

  22. SCIT specific IgG4 response SCIT SLIT SCIT SLIT IgG4 response in long-term SCIT

  23. SCIT compared to SLIT • ClinicalefficacyEarler in SCIT Comparableafter 1 yr • T cellresponseIL-10, TGF-B comarable • AntibodyresponsesMore IgG4 response in SCIT IgA in SLIT?

  24. SLIT OR SCIT? PATIENT-DOCTOR COOPERATION PATIENT-BASED DON’T GENERELİZE

  25. POLISENSITIZATIONSensitizationstatus in allergypatients %25-75 of PATIENTS POLISENSITIZED

  26. allergenic molecule epitope protein Modificato da Aalberse et al. Allergy, 2001 NOMENCLATURE - DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUE ALLERGEN SOURCE “allerjen” ALLERGEN SPT MOLECULE SP-IgE B-CELL EPITOPE COMPONENT MOLECULAR Dg (CMD) POLYALLERGIC / POLYSENSITIZED / CO-SENSITIZATION

  27. POLYALLERGIC / POLYSENSITIZED / CO-SENSITIZATION SHARED MOLECULAR STRUCTURE PSODO POLYSENSITIZED SHARED STRUCTURE DIFFERENT STRUCTURE DIFFERENT MOLECULAR STRUCTURE REAL POLYSENSITIZED Bianchi A, et Al. Rivista di Immunologia e Allergologia Pediatrica 01/2011 • 12-19

  28. Birch CBP profilin Mugwort CBP profilin mugwort birch grass ctr negative histamine Prik test SHARED MOLECULAR ST. PSODO POLYSENSITIZED PATIENT 1 Grass Phl p 2 Phl p 1 Phl p 4 Phl p 5 Phl p 6 polcalcin profilin CMD PRIK: POLYSENSITIZED CMD: MONOALLERGIC

  29. mugwort birch grass ctr negative histamine SPT DIFFERENT MOLECULAR St. REAL POLYSENSITIZED HASTA 2 Grass Birch Phl p 2 Phl p 1 Bet v 1 Phl p 4 Phl p 5 Phl p 6 Phl p 7 Bet v 4 Phl p 12 Bet v 2 Mugwort Art v 5 Art v 4 CMD SPT: Polisensitized CMD: Poliallergic Art v 1

  30. AFTER CMD IT PRESCRIPTION CHANGED IN %56.8 OF PATIENTS PRİK CMD

  31. APPROACH TO POLY-ALLERGIC PATIENT AR AND / OR MILD-MODERATE ASTHMA Q 1- SENSITIZATION STATUS? [SPT, sIgE, CRD, Hx] 1 ALLERGEN 2≤ ALLERGENS MONOSENSİTİZED POLİSENSİTİZED Q 2- NUMBER OF ALLERGENS CLINICALLY IMPORTANT? Test resultsandclinicalcorrelation] MONOALLERGIC POLYALLERGIC

  32. ALGORYTHM FOR IT IN POLYALLERGIC PATIENT 2 OR MORE= POLYALLERGIC Q 1- NUMBER OF ALLERGENS RESPONSIBLE FOR SYMPTOMS WHICH MODE OF IT? PATIENT-PHYSICIAN COOPERATION ONE 2 OR MORE SIT WITH 1 ALLERGEN MULTI IT Q 2- ARE ALLERGENS HOMOLOGOUS? START WITH MOST CLINICALLY RELEVANT ALLERGEN YES NO 2 SEPERATE AIT or 1 HOMOLOGOUS MIXTURE 2 SEPERATE AIT or MIXTURE IN SPECIAL CASES*

  33. ALLERGEN SELECTION IN POLY-ALLERGIC PATIENT Demoly P et al. AllergyAsthma Clin Immunol 2016

  34. Novel Approaches:Expectations Improved Efficacy and Safety?? UNMET NEED CONFIRMATION BY PHASE 3 STUDIES

  35. CONCLUSIONS • SCIT /SLIT efficient in AR and ASTHMA in ADULT / CHILDREN • SCIT earlierclinicalefficacysideeffectsmore • SLIT laterclinicalefficacynegligiblesideeffects • SLIT SCIT long-termefficacy • SCIT vs SLIT slightdifferences in immunologicalresponses • Tablet /drop /SC effiicient - PATIENT BASED CHOICE • NovelDevelopments: • CRD in differentiation of Pollyallegy/monoallergy • New therapeuticapproachestoimproveefficacyandsafety

More Related