1 / 12

Regional Reactor Sales in India – Prospects and Problems

Regional Reactor Sales in India – Prospects and Problems. MohIT ABRAHAM , PARTNER, PXV LAW PARTNERS, Chair, liability working group, Nuclear law Association of India EMAIL: MOHIT.ABRAHAM@PXVLAW.COM. STRICTLY PRIVATE – NOT FOR CIRCULATION. Power allocation in India. Electricity demands.

clodia
Download Presentation

Regional Reactor Sales in India – Prospects and Problems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Regional Reactor Sales in India – Prospects and Problems MohIT ABRAHAM, PARTNER, PXV LAW PARTNERS, Chair, liability working group, Nuclear law Association of India EMAIL: MOHIT.ABRAHAM@PXVLAW.COM STRICTLY PRIVATE – NOT FOR CIRCULATION

  2. Power allocation in India

  3. Electricity demands • India is the 4th largest economy in the world. • India has the 2nd largest GDP amongst developing countries based on purchasing power parity. • Buoyant economy – growth still expected to be in the region of 7-8%. • Availability of electricity a key factor in sustaining growth. • 5th largest electricity generation capacity in the world – over 1,90,592 MW. • Worlds 3rd largest transmission and distribution network. • Country continues to suffer from massive demand-supply gap particularly during peak hours. • 8-10 hours of “load shedding” even in industrialised states. July ‘12 power grid failure – affected over 600 million people. • Great scope for nuclear power – potential value of sector in India at USD 150 Billion.

  4. NSG – Exemptions to india • As a nuclear weapons country, India was excluded from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty – hence excluded from the nuclear trade by the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG). • India could join NPT only if it disarmed and joined as a Non-Nuclear Weapons State – politically impossible. • Owing to an impeccable record of nuclear non-proliferation and strategic economic considerations, India was afforded a clean waiver. • IGAs with France (Sept. 2008), Russia (Dec. 2008) and the US (Oct. 2008) • India – Specific Safeguards Agreement signed in Feb. 2009. Additional protocol signed in May 2009. • Agreements also signed with Canada, Kazakhastan, UK, South Korea, Mongolia, Australia, Argentina. Negotiations on with Japan and EU. • Recognition that India has no obligation from treaties and arrangements to which it is not party (NPT, CTBT, etc.) and the importance of India having assured fuel supplies. • All agreements for peaceful purposes, but do not affect India’s unsafeguarded nuclear activities.

  5. Nuclear energy in india • As of today • About 3-4% of the total electricity produced (approx. 4800 MWe) • Fully indigenous PHWRs • Active collaboration with Russia on Kudankulam NPP (2*1000 MWe) – possible to upscale to another 2*1000 MWe). • The Future • NSG exemptions resulted in about 17% increased outputs in existing plants. Uranium already imported and used in existing PHWRs. • High capacity reactors for imports being negotiated with France, US, Russia, Germany and others. • JV with AREVA and NPCIL for 6*1000 MWe in implementation phase. • DAE projects – 30000 MWe by 2020 and 60,000 MWe by 2032.

  6. CIVIL Nuclear Liability law • The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act, 2010 and the Rules, 2011. • Background – Bhopal Gas Tragedy (Union Carbide), 1984. • Many features of the Act similar to the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage, 1997 (CSD) – India has signed but not ratified. • Liability Caps • NPPs equal to or > than 10 MWe – about USD 330 Million. • Spent fuel reprocessing plants – about USD 66 Million. • NPPs < than 10 MWe, fuel cycle facilties, transportaion of nuclear material, etc. – About USD 22 Million. • Anything over the above caps would be paid by the Government subject to a limit of 300 Million SDR (about USD 450 Million) • Sufficient ? Union Carbide paid over USD 1 billion for the Bhopal Disaster. • Some significant departures from the CSD • While primary liability is on the operators (NPCIL, BHAVINI – both state owned entities), operators may claim a right of recourse in some situations against the supplier. • Section 46 – Act is supplemental – other laws to also apply. Therefore, opening suppliers to actions in Tort, other environmental laws and even criminal liability.

  7. Supplier liability – Changing international nuclear liability jurisprudence • Section 17: • “ The operator of the nuclear installation, after paying the compensation for nuclear damage..shall have a right of recourse where – • (a) Such right is expressly provided for in a contract in writing; • (b) The nuclear incident has resulted as a consequence of an act of supplier or his employee, which includes supply of equipment or material with patent or latent defects or sub-standard services; • (c) The nuclear incident has resulted from the act of commission or omission of an individual done with the intent to cause nuclear damage”. • Exact reproduction of Article 10 of CSC except sub clause (b).

  8. Supplier liabilities - ambiguities • To mollify international community, the government introduced Rule 24 • “ (1) A contract referred to in clause (a) of section 17 of the Act shall include a provision for right of recourse not less than the extent of the operator’s liability or the value of the contract itself, whichever is less; • (2) The provision for the right of recourse referred to in sub-rule (1) shall be for the duration of initial license issued under the Atomic Energy (Radiation Protection) Rules, 2004 or the product liability period, whichever is longer.” • Does not refer to situations in Section 17(b). • Serious ambiguity – no supplier, Indian or foreign happy. • Price escalation – Russian Government and Kudankulam 1,2,3 and 4. • Other countries opposed to supplier liability. GE-H, Westinghouse, Areva, sought changes to the law. • Westinghouse says it will await India’s ratification of the CSC before offering to supply equipment to India. • Activist Indian Judiciary.

  9. A pro-people legislation? (Pic: Courtesy, the Hindu, A. Shaikhmohideen

  10. PUBLIC Perceptions • Major protests at Kudankulam and Jaitapur (site of Areva project). Some NGOs believe that apparent limits on liability of supplier unacceptable. • Hunger strikes, storming of NPP, police strong handedness in combating protests. Pending PIL against Act and Rules in Supreme Court. • Significant change in India’s civilian nuclear power policies post 2008. Earlier NPPs set up in the 80s and 90s near major cities like New Delhi and Chennai witnessed no protests – Why? • Lack of public awareness and engagement with the people on the issue of nuclear power. • Sudden engagement compounds fears – an example of Kudankulam. • Many fears arising out of misinformation – Indian government alleges NGOs of certain countries intentionally spreading misinformation.

  11. The way forward • Ambiguities regarding supplier liability have to go – Government must bite the bullet one way or the other. • Politically, very difficult to remove supplier liability altogether, but clarity would help. Suppliers can then determine the extent of liability, have price negotiations and take out insurance. • Insurance pools – needs to be created. Presently no nuclear insurance pool in India due to restrictions on inspection of facilities by international pools. • Contractual negotiations on supplier liability must be encouraged. Can the Indian government contractually waive its right of recourse against a supplier? • Generation of positive public opinion and detailed engagement with the public. • Tremendous potential for exploiting Nuclear energy in India. India can be an exporter of reactors. Massive potential yet to be tapped. • The future – Regional SAARC based cooperation? Proposal by M.P. Ram Mohan, Chairman, Nuclear Law Association, India.

  12. Thank You

More Related