1 / 15

Challenges in Distribution of ULSD Observations From Colonial Pipeline ULSD Test

Challenges in Distribution of ULSD Observations From Colonial Pipeline ULSD Test. Colonial Pipeline Company Buster Brown January 26, 2005. Topics. Colonial overview Highway and Non-Road sulfur specification Observations from ULSD test Potential pipeline issues. Colonial Pipeline Profile.

Download Presentation

Challenges in Distribution of ULSD Observations From Colonial Pipeline ULSD Test

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Challenges in Distribution of ULSDObservations From Colonial Pipeline ULSD Test Colonial Pipeline Company Buster Brown January 26, 2005

  2. Topics • Colonial overview • Highway and Non-Road sulfur specification • Observations from ULSD test • Potential pipeline issues

  3. Colonial Pipeline Profile • 5,519 mile system from Houston to New York Harbor; operating since 1963 • Delivers more than 2.2 million bpd petroleum products from approximately 30 refineries to more than 250 terminals • 20 percent of all U.S. liquid product delivered by pipeline are handled by Colonial

  4. Highway + Nonroad Diesel Fuel Sulfur Specs* HWY 10/1993 06/2006 01/2010 NR All Highway 15 ppm 6/2007 6/2010 6/2014 6/2012 >80% 15 ppm Highway Diesel 500ppm All Diesel ~3400 ppm NR 15 ppm <20% 500 ppm NR, L&M Diesel 500 ppm L&M 500ppm All Off-Highway Diesel ~3400 ppm Small & Credit ~500 Small & Credit 15 ppm Small & Credit ~3400 HHF ~3400ppm HHF ~3400ppm L&M 15ppm * This figure is intended to illustrate the timeline for the final highway and nonroad diesel fuel sulfur control programs. It is not drawn to exact scale. Refer to 40 CFR Part 80 for specific program dates.

  5. Colonial Pipeline ULSD Test • Test Objective • Determine capability to successfully move ULSD through existing pipeline system • Use data to determine what physical and procedural modifications need to be made to ensure ability to transport ULSD • Use test results to set sulfur specs at origins

  6. 1st Batch 140,000 B Destinations Birmingham, AL Atlanta, GA Nashville, TN Macon, GA Greensboro, NC 2nd Batch 144,000 B Destinations Birmingham, AL Atlanta, GA Greensboro, NC Baltimore, MD New York Harbor ULSD Test Description Both batches originated into 36” distillate mainline at Baton Rouge and distributed along system to representative locations.

  7. ULSD Test Description (continued) • Multiple product sequences; Gasoline, high- and low-sulfur diesel and kerosine leading the ULSD test batches. • Over 1500 samples analyzed. • Quantified trail-back of sulfur into ULSD batch from adjacent products. • Quantified sulfur contamination from manifolds, valves, dead segments, and high sulfur tank bottoms. • Used special protective operating procedures for test batch.

  8. ULSD Test Observations • “Successful” movement through system with sulfur increase of 6-8 ppm • Size of product interface at head-end of batch was 1.5x to 2x normal • Tank farms resulted in largest contribution of sulfur increase • Valve integrity, tank line, manifold and dead leg segments were primary sources of sulfur increase • Sulfur analyzers are complex and difficult to maintain • Normal cutting procedures (gravity) may be ineffective. Therefore need quick, accurate, on-line sulfur analyzers.

  9. Test Conclusions • Significant volume downgrade of ULSD • (estimated to be 8% to 10% of total ULSD volume) • Sulfur analysis equipment needs improvement • Continued effort to understand and minimize tank farm issues

  10. Sulfur Specification Formula for Developing Product Specification Legal Requirement 15 ppm Downstream Enforcement Tolerance + 2 ppm PLUS MINUS Test Method Reproducibility -4 ppm* Transportation Degradation -6 to -8 ppm** MINUS • Potential ULSD Specification at Refinery Gate = 5-7 ppm * ASTM “round robin” results have a reproducibility range from 6-16 ppm. * *depending upon the number of tank farms

  11. Product Movement Refinery to End User After refining, products must be shipped from the refinery to terminals where it can be loaded onto tanker trucks bound for gas stations, homes, businesses and airports. Terminal Tank Refinery Third Party Pipeline Colonial Intermediate Colonial Origin Stubline Mainline Colonial Origin Mainline Refinery Tank Colonial Intermediate Stubline 3rd Party Tank Terminal Tank

  12. Possible Colonial Sulfur Specification If every step improves… Ideal Receive into Colonial 7 Upstream transfer system 2 Colonial improves from 6-8 5 Downstream transfer system 2 Reproducibility improves to 4 2 TOTAL 18 The specification is 17 ppm at retail.

  13. ULSD Pathforward for Colonial • Implement special operating procedures for ULSD handling. • Evaluate construction of additional tanks and modify manifolds. - May require ULSD surcharge to existing diesel tariffs. • Concern with upstream and downstream facilities handling. • Work with customers to determine “appropriate, workable” specification at refinery gate. • May not supply all diesel grades to all markets.

  14. Q&A

More Related