Cannibalization effects between innovation communities members
Download
1 / 10

Cannibalization effects between innovation communities’ members - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 107 Views
  • Uploaded on

Cannibalization effects between innovation communities’ members. Alexey Barykin Dmitry Karabanov National Research University– Higher School of Economics Moscow, Russia. WIP. Open innovation framework. Closed paradigm. Open paradigm. Income. Sell of IP. New source of income. Spin-offs.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Cannibalization effects between innovation communities’ members' - chico


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Cannibalization effects between innovation communities members

Cannibalization effects between innovation communities’ members

AlexeyBarykin

Dmitry Karabanov

National Research University– Higher School of Economics

Moscow, Russia

WIP


Open innovation framework
Open innovation framework members

Closed paradigm

Open paradigm

Income

Sell of IP

New source of income

Spin-offs

Issuing licenses

“IP outsourcing” economy

Costs


The new venue for research
The new venue for research members

Open vs Closed innovation paradigm +

Complex products and services +

Innovation communities +

Cannibalization

=

Is there a link between the level of your BM “openness” and the possibility to face cannibalization effects inside an innovation community?

H1: There is a positive correlation between a sum of innovation community members’ business model levels and the number of cannibalizations events inside that innovation community.


Innovation communities theory
Innovation communities - theory members

  • Consists of organizations

  • The relations are formalized a) in paper (manifest, agreement, etc) ; or b) by setting up a non-commercial joint venture

  • More than one member of a community is represented by commercial organization

  • The mission of a community is to foster members’ competitive advantage based on the open innovations

  • Combined market share does not lead to monopoly (not state owned corporations, cartels, etc.)


Innovation communities practice
Innovation communities - practice members

Communities inside Russia

  • Pollock association

  • Regional bank association

  • Constructors association

  • Branding agencies association

  • Other…

  • National association of power element manufacturers “RUSBAT”


Bm level determination
BM level determination members

Business model concept

BM type

Innovation process

IP management

Company openness index

Community parameters



Cannibalization
Cannibalization members

  • An increase of a community member’s market share without a respective increase in total community market share

    • National economy downturn

    • An increase of rival communities’ share

    • Lack of opportunity to grow organically

  • Loss of technological competitive advantage


Further research questions
Further research questions members

  • Conducting a set of semi-structured interviews with IC management to determine cannibalization effects took place

  • Broadening the sample by discovering and analyzing more innovation communities in Russia

  • A longitudinal study of BM openness index change and members’/community market share

  • Excluding statistical “noises” from the market share fluctuations

  • Development of non-linear BM level intervals


Q&A members


ad