Addressing Patient Safety in Transfusion: standardising documentation

Addressing Patient Safety in Transfusion: standardising documentation PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Purpose. To improve the reliability of the transfusion processTo achieve this through standardisationDocumentationProcess . Background. 120,748 blood components issued by Welsh Blood Service 2006-2007 Adverse events due to transfusion process errorsRange of transfusion charts and forms througho

Download Presentation

Addressing Patient Safety in Transfusion: standardising documentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

1. Addressing Patient Safety in Transfusion: standardising documentation Maria Cheadle Karen Shreeve Better Blood Transfusion Team

2. Purpose To improve the reliability of the transfusion process To achieve this through standardisation Documentation Process

3. Background 120,748 blood components issued by Welsh Blood Service 2006-2007 Adverse events due to transfusion process errors Range of transfusion charts and forms throughout Wales Standardisation All-Wales drug chart in use All-Wales anticoagulant chart being developed

4. Background

5. Lack of understanding of what a bedside check involves, and why A 67-year old female patient in a side room was prescribed a transfusion. A trained housekeeper took the correct patient documentation to the issue fridge, but collected a unit of blood for a different patient with the same first and last name. The unit was checked outside the side room, against the compatibility statement, by two nurses. The transfusion record was completed by both nurses indicating that all checks had been completed. One nurse then entered the room and administered the blood without a bedside ID check. The patient was group O RhD positive and received a unit of A RhD positive red cells. The already severely ill patient developed respiratory problems and died later that day, though there was no record of haemolysis.

6. Background Lack of understanding of the reasoning behind the decision making process in transfusion Underpinning knowledge and familiarity with transfusion protocols absent Process failures Worrying disregard for protocol and an offhand attitude to bedside checking Patients receiving blood without prescription Patients with no identification receiving components Prescription based on incorrect results or poor/absent clinical reasoning

7. Background

8. Background SHOT 2007 – general recommendations junior doctors’ education qualified, trained and competent staff to be responsible for transfusion safety laboratory and clinical area Junior doctors’ dynamic training process exposure to a wide and varied range of documentation National Comparative Audits (2003, 2005, 2008) transfusion episodes often poorly documented

9. Fundamental Principles

10. The problem… WBS BBT recognised need to standardise documentation as a priority Aim - Improve the safety and quality of transfusion practice Opportunity to link to1000 lives campaign Endorsed by WAG Clinical Advisory Group and Medical Directors of all Welsh Trusts

11. Project goals To standardize the underpinning processes associated with the transfusion process through the development of an All-Wales blood transfusion request form and transfusion record To achieve 95% reliability in documentation correctness and completeness associated with the transfusion process (proxy measure for understanding and complying with the process)

12. Project Measures Process Measures % completion of documentation (initially stratified into different elements to target improvement) Balancing Measure Staff satisfaction with the request form and transfusion record (e.g. time to complete, relevance of component parts of form, perception about added safety) Outcome Measure ‘days between’ adverse incidents (may be stratified into transient, permanent or fatal)

13. Documents already in use Is it all necessary? How will we know? Who can help us?

14. Our journey….. Destination - standardised transfusion documentation in use across Wales Vehicle - 1000 lives campaign and PDSA

15. PDSA?

17. Plan Two standardised documents were developed for trial - transfusion record and transfusion request form Recruit participants

18. Do One staff member, one patient, one form Documents sequentially trialled in a range of clinical areas and the transfusion laboratory to demonstrate that they were fit for purpose

20. Study Parts not completed Why? User feedback essential – engage with staff Ownership of document

21. Chart showing number and % of completed data items on blood transfusion request forms

22. Results 2 standardised documents Fit for purpose Clear instructions Logical flow Make what is right to do easy to do Reliability from being guided through the process

23. Challenges Enthusiasts Willing but not enthusiastic Low priority Resistance to change Reluctance to give up bits important to them

24. Lessons learnt Start small – minimum resources Select an area where staff are willing Engage big users early on – need ownership Testing in different conditions is essential Good leadership and clinical engagement is essential

25. Lessons learnt (2) Opportunity to challenge obsolete custom and practice Keep people engaged Be prepared for a progress dip Benefits of joining with 1000 Lives Co-opt expert help – use it!

26. Future developments Real-time measurement of reduction in transfusion errors Impact of national guidelines, advice etc. Inclusion of bedside tracking

27. Finished article?

  • Login