1 / 9

Vibrant Detector r&D Program

Vibrant Detector r&D Program. Calorimetry W-Scintillator & W-Si compact and high resolution Crystal calorimeters PbW & BGO BNL, Indiana University, Penn State Univ., UCLA, USTC, TAMU. Pre-Shower W-Si LYSO pixel array with readout via X -Y WLS fibers Univ. Tecnica Valparaiso.

Download Presentation

Vibrant Detector r&D Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Vibrant Detector r&DProgram • Calorimetry • W-Scintillator & W-Si • compact and high resolution • Crystal calorimeters PbW& BGO • BNL, Indiana University, Penn State Univ., UCLA, USTC, TAMU • Pre-Shower • W-Si • LYSO pixel array with • readout via X-Y WLS fibers • Univ. Tecnica Valparaiso • PID via Cerenkov • DIRC and timing info • Catholic Univ. of America, Old Dominion, South Carolina, JLab, GSI • RICH based on GEM readout • e-PID: GEM based TRD  eSTAR • BNL, Indiana Univ., USTC, VECC, ANL • Tracking • BNL, Florida Inst. Of Technology, Iowa State, LBNL, MIT, Stony Brook, Temple, Jlab, Virginia, Yale • m-Vertex: central and forward based on MAPS • Central: TPC/HBD provides low mass, • good momentum, dE/dx, eID • Fast Layer: m-Megasor PImMS • Forward: Planar GEM detectors “Cartesian PreShower”

  2. What needs to be covered BY THE DETECTOR ~ H, H, E, E (x,ξ,t) g, p,J/Y e gL* (Q2) x+ξ x-ξ ~ t e’ • Inclusive Reactions in ep/eA: • Physics: Structure Fcts.: F2, FL • Very good electron id  find scattered lepton • Momentum/energy and angular resolution of e’ critical • scattered lepton  kinematics p’ p • Semi-inclusive Reactions in ep/eA: • Physics: TMDs, Helicity PDFs flavor separation, dihadron-corr.,… •  Kaon asymmetries, cross sections • Excellent particle ID: p±,K±,p± separation over a wide range in h • full F-coverage around g* • Excellent vertex resolution  Charm, Bottom identification • Exclusive Reactions in ep/eA: • Physics: GPDs, proton/nucleus imaging, DVCS, excl. VM/PS prod. • Exclusivity  large rapidity coverage  rapidity gap events • ↘ reconstruction of all particles in event • high resolution in t  Roman pots

  3. Requirements from Kinematics • Emerging Detector Concept: • high acceptance -5 < h < 5 central detector • good PID (p,K,p and lepton) and vertex resolution (< 5mm) • tracking and calorimeter same coverage  good momentum resolution, lepton PID • low material density  minimal multiple scattering and brems-strahlung • Magnetic field extremely critical to get good tracking resolution in forward direction • Integration of detector in IR design • very forward electron and proton/neutron detection • Roman Pots, ZDC, low e-tagger • Scattered lepton: • Ee = 5 GeV -2 < h < 1 Ee = 30 GeV-4.5 < h < -1 • Produced Hadrons: • increasing √s hadrons are boosted from forward rapiditiesh > 1 to backward h < 0 • -3<h<3 covers entire pt & z-region important for physics

  4. BNL: 1st Detector Design Concept ECAL W-Scintillator ECAL WScin ECAL PWO Upstream low Q2 tagger To Roman Pots HCAL HCAL RICH RICH DIRC/proximity RICH h -h PID: -1<h<1: DIRC or proximity focusing Aerogel-RICH 1<|h|<3: RICH Lepton-ID: -3 <h< 3: e/p 1<|h|<3: in addition Hcalresponse & g suppression via tracking |h|>3: ECal+Hcalresponse & g suppression via tracking -5<h<5: Tracking (TPC+GEM+MAPS)

  5. eRHIC high-luminosity IR with b*=5 cm p 20x250 e eRHIC - Geometry high-lumi IR with β*=5 cm, l*=4.5 m and 10 mrad crossing angle 20x250 Generated Quad aperture limited RP (at 20m) accepted 10 mrad crossing angle and crab-crossing High gradient (200 T/m) large aperture Nb3Snfocusing magnets Arranged free-field electron pass through the hadron triplet magnets Integration with the detector: efficient separation and registration of low angle collision products Gentle bending of the electrons to avoid SR impact in the detector

  6. Exclusive Reactions: Event Selection Diffractive peak Q2 W MY How can we select events: two methods • proton/neutrontag method • Measurement of t • Free of p-diss background • Higher MX range • to have high acceptance for • RomanPots / ZDC challenging •  IR design Need for roman pot spectrometer AND ZDC • Large Rapidiy Gap method • X system and e’ measured • Proton dissociation background • High acceptance Need for Hcal in the forward region

  7. DVCS Kinematics ~ e g H, H, E, E (x,ξ,t) gL* (Q2) x+ξ x-ξ ~ leading protons are never in the main detector acceptance at EIC (stage 1 and 2) e’ eRHICdetector acceptance t p’ p • REQUIREMENTS • Acceptance at large-|t| •  proper design of quadrupole magnets • Acceptance forthe whole solid angle • High momentum resolution • radiation hardness

  8. t-Measurement using RP Accepted in“Roman Pot”at 20m 20x250 GeV Quadrupoles acceptance 5x100 GeV 5x100 GeV Simulation based on eRHIC 10s from the beam-pipe 20x250 • • high‐|t| acceptance mainly limited by magnet aperture • • low‐|t| acceptance limited by beam envelop (~10σ) • • |t|‐resolution limited by • – beam angular divergence ~100μrad for small |t| • – uncertainties in vertex (x,y,z) and transport • – ~<5-10% resolution in t (follow • RP at STAR) Generated Quad aperture limited RP (at 20m) accepted

  9. Kinematics of Breakup Neutrons Results from GEMINI++ for 50 GeV Au • Results: • With an aperture of ±3 mrad we are in good shape • • enough “detection” power for t > 0.025 GeV2 • • below t ~ 0.02 GeV2photon detection in very forward direction • Question: • For some physics needed rejection power for incoherent: ~104 • Critical: ZDC efficiency +/-5mrad acceptance totallysufficient

More Related