1 / 20

River networks as emergent characteristics of open dissipative systems

River networks as emergent characteristics of open dissipative systems. Kyungrock Paik and Praveen Kumar 4th IAHR Symposium on River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Acknowledgements

ceri
Download Presentation

River networks as emergent characteristics of open dissipative systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. River networks as emergent characteristics of open dissipative systems Kyungrock Paik and Praveen Kumar 4th IAHR Symposium on River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Acknowledgements National Science Foundation grant no. EAR 02-08009 Dissertation Completion Fellowships from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  2. River networks exhibit apparent self-similarity, or more broadly fractal Rogue River in Oregon Self-similar topological organization [e.g., Peckham, 1995] What causes this regularity?

  3. Optimal channel network (OCN) [Rodriguez-Iturbe et al., 1992b; Rinaldo et al., 1992] Minimum energy expenditure Is this a result of an optimization process?

  4. 574h 303h 151h Figures from Stevens[1974] Is this a result of an optimization process?

  5. 574h 303h 151h Figures from Stevens[1974] “This ‘law-like’ feature seems to emerge as the inevitable result of a dynamic process that minimizes the dissipation of energy”- Mark Buchanan [Nature 419, 787 (24 October 2002) ] Is this a result of an optimization process?

  6. Hypothesis Evolutionary dynamics driven by a flow gradient and subject to proximity constraint, that is, the matter and energy can traverse only through a continuum, in the presence of inherent randomness of media properties, give rise to a tree topological organization. However, the mechanism that enables the systems to find these extremal states remains elusive

  7. Grid size: 500m × 500m Domain: 40401 cells (201 × 201) Effective cells: 31397 (=7849.25 km2) < Puerto Rico Dt =2 years l=0.5 rs=2650 kg/m3 Dynamic equilibrium condition To test the proposed hypothesis, a deterministic numerical model is built

  8. Regard river networks as streamlines. Streamlines: orthogonal to the geographic contour D8 method [O'Callaghan and Mark, 1984] for flow path decision Governing eq: Schoklitsch [1934] ie=0.1mm/hr (=876mm/yr) To test the proposed hypothesis, a deterministic numerical model is built

  9. Simulation resultTime: 0 years

  10. Simulation resultTime: 10 years

  11. Simulation resultTime: 102years

  12. Simulation resultTime: 103years

  13. Simulation resultTime: 104years

  14. Simulation resultTime: 105years 294 Watersheds

  15. Power law relationships can be measures of self-similarity Figures from [Maritan et al., 1996] and [Rigon et al., 1996]

  16. Power law relationships can be measures of self-similarity P(Ad d) d-e e=0.43±0.03 [Rodriguez-Iturbe et al., 1992] x  dh h=0.6±0.1 [Hack, 1957] P(L  l)  l-ff=0.68±0.24 [Rigon et al., 1996; Crave and Davy, 1997] Figures from [Maritan et al., 1996] and [Rigon et al., 1996]

  17. Simulated networks exhibit these power law distributions P(L  l)  l-0.65

  18. Key results are robust regardless of the shape of islands

  19. The insights gained here may be extended to explain the formation of other networks Images from [Merrill, 1978], http://www.lightningsafety.noaa.gov/photos.htm, [Huber et al., 2000], and [Jun and Hübler, 2005]

  20. In summary, evolutionary dynamics driven by a flow gradient and subject to proximity constraint, that is, the matter and energy can traverse only through a continuum, in the presence of inherent randomness of media properties, give rise to a tree topological organization The minimization of energy expenditure is not the cause but a consequent signature Findings may serve as a motif for the formation of other networks. Questions?

More Related