1 / 15

ESPON 2.3.2 GOVERNANCE OF TERRITORIAL AND URBAN POLICIES FROM EU TO LOCAL LEVEL

This study examines the governance of territorial and urban policies, focusing on the evaluation of indicators and models. It analyzes the institutional frameworks, processes, and results of these policies, considering both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The study also highlights the challenges of integrating different approaches and proposes case studies to gather data. The findings aim to provide policy recommendations for improving governance in territorial and urban contexts.

cdeluna
Download Presentation

ESPON 2.3.2 GOVERNANCE OF TERRITORIAL AND URBAN POLICIES FROM EU TO LOCAL LEVEL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ESPON 2.3.2 GOVERNANCE OF TERRITORIAL AND URBAN POLICIES FROM EU TO LOCAL LEVEL Luxembourg, 18 May 2005 Joaquín Farinós Dasí University of Valencia

  2. Operational definition of governance and formulation of hypothesis

  3. Context Territorial features and dynamics To describe Favourable territorial preconditions To evaluate Policies Institutional frameworks of territorial policies To describe TGAs Processes To evaluate Results Types of indicators/criteria

  4. Looking for Data and Indicators * Space has to be seen as an encompassing category

  5. Starting set of Indicators

  6. The Challenge of Integrating Quantitative – Qualitative Approaches S C A L E S BENCHMARKING POLICY RECOMENDATIONS COMPARISON: Analyse potential impacts of Good Governance on Urban & Territorial Policies Available Data + Data collection

  7. Matrix for Case Studies Proposal

  8. Case Studies Proposal

  9. Case Studies Proposal

  10. National Overviews: First Results on Context

  11. National Overviews: First Results on Context

  12. National Overviews: First Results on Policies

  13. Concluding remarks • Inexistence or serious limitations in quantitative data & indicators for territorial governance. Qualitative information and methods needed. • Governance, as a new mode of thinking and acting, seems to be universally accepted, at least at the level of national governments (rev. ECSP) Least clear at which extent by all government levels and agencies and by civil society (Effects on Lisbon Strategy) • Positive elements are: - long tradition of “working together” and citizens’ participation, - innovations in the field of partnership creation, - reorganization of spatial planning system and - introduction of new instruments and agencies • There are conditions, albeit diffuse, pressing urgently in governance actions ◘Structure of State seems to be less decisive than mature – or easy to recompose -systems of planning, specially spatial planning for sustainable spatial development ◘ European Union policies (particularly Structural Funds) and integration processes are recognized as the most important catalyst factor for adoption of governance approaches (relates to ESDP and future Regional Policy)

  14. Next steps for 232 ESPON Project • Development of Case Studies + Data Collection (WP4) (Second ½ May – September 2005) • Analysis of Governance Trends: Indicators of Successful Governance and Models of Governance (WP5) (October 2004 – February 2005) • 3rdIR in December 2005

  15. Thank you for your attention!!

More Related