1 / 28

A. Shapiro, T. Egorova, E. Rozanov and FUSPOL team PMOD/WRC, Davos, Switzerland

Comparison of the SSI data sets using observed and simulated evolution of the middle atmosphere during 2004-2010. A. Shapiro, T. Egorova, E. Rozanov and FUSPOL team PMOD/WRC, Davos, Switzerland IAC ETH, Zurich, Switzerland University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland EAWAG, Dubendorf, Switzerland.

Download Presentation

A. Shapiro, T. Egorova, E. Rozanov and FUSPOL team PMOD/WRC, Davos, Switzerland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparison of the SSI data sets using observed and simulated evolution of the middle atmosphere during 2004-2010 A. Shapiro, T. Egorova, E. Rozanov and FUSPOL team PMOD/WRC, Davos, Switzerland IAC ETH, Zurich, Switzerland University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland EAWAG, Dubendorf, Switzerland

  2. Questions • Can we decide which SSI data set is right comparing simulated and measured ozone and temperature time series? • How important is SSI for the future climate warming and ozone recovery?

  3. SSI data sets SORCE data LEAN data 1950 2004.05 2009.02 SIM SOLSTICE LEAN 2007-2004

  4. Key photochemical processes dO3 (‰/nm): Ozone mixing ratio changes due to the observed variability of the spectral solar irradiance (min to max)(Rozanov et al. 2002)

  5. ΔO3 (%) 2004 - 2007 1D-RCPM

  6. CCM SOCOL Lean data 2004.05-2009.02 SIM and SOLSTICE dominated composites 2004.05-2009.02

  7. 121 nm 210 nm 290 nm 750 nm CCM SOCOL runs LEAN data + 2 composites: SOLSTICE SIM SOLSTICE SIM 5 ensemble runs with each dataset + 5 reference ensemble runs

  8. ΔO3 (%) 11.2004 – 11.2008, No solar

  9. Comparison with observations

  10. Uncertainties

  11. Comparison with observations

  12. Uncertainties

  13. Conclusions • Right choice of SSI is important for the stratosphere • We can identify time/location when and where the simulated solar signal is significant • However, the uncertainty of the available satellite data is not high enough to make definite conclusions • Long-term and accurate measurements of all quantities are necessary

  14. Anthropogenic activity ODS GHG Ozone depletion Greenhouse warming SI Solar variability

  15. From Barnard et al., 2011

  16. Model experiments Four experiments in time slice mode, 20-years, 10 years spin up “REF” “TSI” “SSI” “ANT”

  17. Future TSI Source: Shapiro et al., 2011 TSI for the reference = 1367.77 W/m2 TSI for a strong minimum = 1363.87 W/m2 Forcing = -0.7 W/m2 Input for the radiation code of the model

  18. Future UV 205 nm ~15 % decrease

  19. T2m (K) for ANT and TSI runs

  20. T2m (K) for ANT and SSI runs

  21. TOZ (DU) for ANT and TSI runs

  22. TOZ (DU) for ANT and SSI runs

  23. Conclusions • These results probably represent the upper limit of the possible solar influence. • A deeper understanding and the construction of a better constrained set of future solar forcings and the application of the models with an interactive ocean are necessary to address the problem of predicting the future climate and state of the ozone layer with more confidence. • The development of more reliable solar forcing data sets requires the maintenance and extension of all relevant satellite and ground-based observations as well as further theoretical investigations.

  24. FUPSOL project Estimate the contribution of solar related forcings (irradiance and particles) to the climate and global ozone evolution during the from 17th to end of 21st centuries using ocean-chemistry-climate model.

  25. Thank you!

  26. 1D simulations

  27. Simulated ozone response Tropical mean 26oN – 26oS

  28. Simulated temperature response Tropical mean 26oN – 26oS

More Related