1 / 18

NESSI-Grid Strategic Research Agenda

NESSI-Grid Strategic Research Agenda. Ricardo Jimenez-Peris (SRA Chief-Editor) Universidad Politecnica de Madrid. Introduction: Goal & Timeline. May 06 Sep06 Oct06 May 07 Oct07 June 08 … Oct 08 v0.9 v1.0 v1.5 v2.0 v2.5 … v3.0

Download Presentation

NESSI-Grid Strategic Research Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NESSI-Grid Strategic Research Agenda Ricardo Jimenez-Peris (SRA Chief-Editor) Universidad Politecnica de Madrid

  2. Introduction: Goal & Timeline May 06 Sep06 Oct06 May 07 Oct07June 08…Oct 08 v0.9 v1.0 v1.5 v2.0 v2.5…v3.0 project early internal SOI-WG community publicroadmapstart draft edition draft edition draft edition • Goal: A Vision & SRA for • a grid-like service-oriented infrastructure for business environments and business applications • Context: NESSI • vision of a service-oriented economy • NESSI scenarios & architecture • Timeline

  3. Introduction: Contributors • Contributors (so far) • NESSI-Grid consortium: Telefonica, ATOS, BT, IBM, NOKIA-Siemens, Thales, INRIA, Engineering, SAP • Ricardo Jimenez-Peris (UPM): SRA Editor-in-chief • Ignacio Martín Llorente (UCM): Grid Community Liaison Coordinator for SOI-NWG • 17 research projects • ASSESSGRID, A-WARE, BRIDGEEDUTAIN@GRID, G-ECLIPSE, GRID4ALL GRIDCOMP, GRIDTRUST, HPC4U, KWF GRID, ONTOGRID, SIMDAT, SORMA, XTREEMOS, ProGRID, UNIGRIDSBEinGRID • 8 Infrastructures & Middleware solutions • CESGA, EGEE, GRIA, gLite,UNICORE, GRID4ALL, Globus GridWay, KNOWARC • 23 individual experts • Participants from • SOI NWG meetings, NESSI SRA working group

  4. SRA aspects & evolution

  5. Vision • Driver • Agile businesses drive adaptive IT • Vision • Business Grids - the adaptive service-oriented utility infrastructure for business applications • Applied SOKU paradigm • Service-Oriented • Knowledge-assisted • Utility • Context • Business applications

  6. Methodology Driver & Vision Context(Business Applications) Scenarios & Requirements Infrastructures State of the art(Research & Technology) Research Areas Want Have Technology Trends Compare & Contrast Challenges Expertknowledge BusinessIndicators Roadmap

  7. Context • Context: Business Applications • Online applications: • Most business applications are online. • Clients of business applications care about the response time they observe. • Industrial benchmarks for online applications set strict statistical distribution thresholds for the provided response times. • Stateful nature: • Business applications are typically stateful: Conversational (sessions) or persistent state. • Persistent state is updateable with typical workloads ranging from 20-50% of updates. • Transactional Semantics: • State belongs to business so it requires consistency guarantees. • In the advent of concurrent accesses to shared state isolation should be provided. • In the advent of failures, all-or-nothing semantics should be guaranteed. • The outcome of successful transactions should be durable despite failures. • Multi-Tier Architectures • Business applications are typically constructed on top of multi-tier architectures. • Their gridification should be transparent.

  8. Context • Context: What is Different from Scientific Applications? • Online vs. offline: • Scientific applications are characterized by being batch applications. • The main concern is high utilization of the underlying infrastructure. • No concern about response time of individual requests. • Stateful vs. stateless: • Scientific applications typically stateless. • Persistent state typically read-only, in some cases write-once read-many. • Read-only workloads. • Transactional Semantics: • Scientific applications are not concerned about transactional semantics. • Scientific grids are not aware of transactions. • Multi-Tier Architectures: • Scientific applications are not typically built on top of multi-tier architectures. • Scientific grids are not aware of multiple tiers.

  9. Business Scenarios • Business scenarios • Enterprise: core scenario for traditional infrastructures • Hierarchical Enterprise: includes notion of enterprise policy hierarchies • Hosting: special case of enterprise & virtual organisation • Extended enterprise: includes devices beyond the traditional backend (pervasive, sensors, …) • Dynamic Outsourcing: dynamic migration of IT resources between administrative domains • Mergers & acquisitions: merge of previously separated administrative domains • Virtual organizations: multi-party (at least 3) collaboration and resource/service sharing • Business value networks: complex chains including multiple providers/administrative domains • Mega Services: services to millions of customers across the globe

  10. State of the Art • Considered under 3 main perspectives: • Infrastructures • Research and Scientific Grids • Enterprise Grids • Virtual-machines based Grids • Mobile Grids • Research fields • Data Grids, Data Replication, Multitier Systems, Application Development, Performance Engineering, Cost & Revenue Management, Autonomic Computing, Virtualisation, Security, Interoperatiblity • New Technology Trends • Storage and Data Management; Processor Technology; Virtualisation; Network Connectivity; Mobile devices; Sustainability

  11. Research Challenges • 47 research challenges • Data Management (scalability, low latency geo, autonomy) • Application Development (automatic parallelism, mobility app support, automatic distribution) • Network Connectivity (end2end, heterogeneity, mobility, adaptiveMiddleware) • Accounting and SLAs (transparent, holistic) • Dependability (self healing, cost awareness, mobile) • Security (isolated zones, policies, identity mngmt, reputation&trust) • Performance (predictable virtualisation, integrated scheduling, prediction, resource mng) • Interoperability (standards, composed multi tiers, dynamic, non functional) • Manageability (mng4Business, new devices, virtualisation&deploy, ctrl&monitor, multiple domains, mediation conflict, self management) • Governance (specifications, enforcement, translation) • Flexibility (support changes, autonomy, scalability, dynamic allocation, large scale, dynamic security) • Mastering Complex Systems (holistic modelling, flexible simulation, integrated tooling) • Overarching Challenges (business value, complexity, architecture driven)

  12. ResearchChallenges Governance Overarching Management Long term Flexibility Temporal Accomplishment Acc. & SLAs Depend. Data Mng. Medium term Interop. Performance Short term Complex Syst. Security Network Conn. Challenges Dependency Analysis

  13. Market & business indicators • Objectives • To define a collection of GRID-related market & business indicators to: • Help defining the SRA challenges and roadmap • Monitor the impact of the SRA implementation • Main areas • Target market and main players: • Identify from where to extract business indicators • Stakeholders that will benefit from a Service-Oriented Infrastructure • Sectors and main players • Identify how SOI-related tech can improve the solution for the main needs • Needs  functional requirements  priorities  SRA roadmap • Indicators • Purpose: • To measure the actual use of SOI-technology at certain moment in time • To show evolution of this usage  Impact measurement • By comparing periodic snapshots of Business Indicator’s value • Definition of a collection of relevant Business Indicators • Emergence of new vendors, new GRID middleware products, new consulting companies, adoption level on companies,….

  14. Roadmap Roadmap dimensions organizational complexity technical reach service enabling VirtualOrganization ExtendedEnterprise Merger &Acquisition HierarchicalEnterprise Enterprise Hosting DynamicOutsourcing MegaServices ValueNetworks

  15. Roadmap

  16. Conclusions: Key Challenges • Summarizing key challenges • New system architectures • harmonize & advance SOA, SOI, multi-tier, federated and Internet scale • support all kinds of business models, applications and emerging HW env. • provide transparent and integrated access for all relevant stakeholders • Advanced system lifecycle approaches • support transparent knowledge tracking, feedback loops, prediction and simulation from engineering to decommissioning • clear separation of concerns between different stakeholders (Biz vs. IT, …) • adhering to overarching sustainability req. for full variety of Biz scenarios • Advanced infrastructure technologies in terms of • hardware (energy efficient, flexible allocation, virtualization …) • middleware (scalability, new multi-tier system design, flexible storage systems, harmonized virtualization on all layers) • related programming models (parallel & distributed programming, multi-core)

  17. Thank you • Thank you!

  18. Enabling the next wave of services NETWORKED EUROPEAN SOFTWARE & SERVICE INITIATIVE

More Related