1 / 31

Evolution of the New Jersey Shelf Observing System: Our Experience

This article discusses the evolution and experience of the New Jersey Shelf Observing System, including operational models, real-time ensemble forecasts, and the integration of various observational platforms. The article also explores the use of satellites and RADAR in the observing system.

Download Presentation

Evolution of the New Jersey Shelf Observing System: Our Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evolution of the New Jersey Shelf Observing System: Our Experience Scott Glenn, Oscar Schofield aka (Scotscar)and many equal partnersCoastal Ocean Observation Lab, Rutgers Science web site http://marine.rutgers.edu/cool Operational web site http://www.thecoolroom.org

  2. 30 X 30 km LEO

  3. ROMs Assimilation MODAS Assimilation Atmosphere/Ocean Physical/Biological Forecast Models Operational Low-Res COAMPS Atmospheric Model Experimental High-Res RAMS Atmospheric Model Air-Sea Interaction Model ROMS Ocean Model (KPP and MY 2.5 Turbulent Closure) Bottom Boundary Layer Model

  4. 2001 Real-time Ensemble Forecasts

  5. Real-Time Ensemble Validation HR COAMPS / ROMS 2 4 6 8 10 12 KPP Depth (m) 2 4 6 8 10 12 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 Depth (m) 2 4 6 8 10 12 Depth (m) MY2.5 18 18 18 19 19 19 20 20 20 21 21 21 July, 2001 July, 2001 July, 2001 Thermistor • In an observationally rich • environment, ensemble forecasts • can be compared to real-time data • to assess which model is closer to reality • and try to understand why.

  6. 3-D visualization Forecast Briefing Hindcast Models EcoSim Bio-Optical Model Atmosphere/Ocean Physical/Biological Forecast Models Operational Low-Res COAMPS Atmospheric Model Experimental High-Res COAMPS Atmospheric Model Air-Sea Interaction Model ROMS Ocean Model (KPP and MY 2.5 Turbulent Closure) Bottom Boundary Layer Model

  7. Models

  8. Surface and Bottom Floats

  9. International Constellation of Ocean Color Satellites X-Band Earth Observing Satellites EOS (MODIS) USA 2001 NEMO (COIS) USA 2004 Orbview-2 (SeaWiFS) USA Op. HY-1 (COCTS/CZI) China 2002 FY1-C (MVISR) China Op. FY1-D (MVISR) China 2002 IRS-P3 (MOS) India Op. IRS-P4 (OCM) India Op. ADEOS-2 Japan 2002 (GLI/POLDER) ENVISAT(MERIS) Europe 2002

  10. CODAR Total Vector Calculation Kilometers CODAR North 0 5 10 Little Egg Harbor CODAR Central Site Great Bay LEO-15 A T L A N T I C O C E A N CODAR South Atlantic City

  11. Radial Velocity Map Brant Beach Site Brigantine Site 25 km A 25 cm/s

  12. 1998 1999 2000 2001 Test

  13. Adaptive Sampling with REMUS AUVs

  14. Red Tide Observed at 790 nm on 22 July 2000 With the PHILLS Sensor 100 meters

  15. Ship-to-Shore Communications Towed Instruments Profiling Instruments

  16. Ceratium fusus c a b Bioluminescence Potential 1e6 4e10 Photons/sec/ml 0 6 12 Depth (m) 18 24 a 0 1.0 2.0 Distance (km)

  17. Scientists want real-time observational nowcasts and model forecasts …. DO REAL PEOPLE CARE?

  18. Rutgers Web Site Statistics Data Type Other 14% NODES 13% CODAR 17% Gulf Stream 10% MET 17% LEO 6% Non-profit (7%) Rutgers Web Site Statistics By Hour SST 53% Education (6%) East Coast 19% 8000 June General Public 69% 7000 Military & Government(4%) July 6000 August NYB 37% 5000 Average Hourly Hits September 4000 October 3000 November 2000 MAB 28% December 1000 January 0 Region 0:00 3:00 6:00 9:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00 What they want KPAR

  19. New Jersey Shelf Observing System (NJ-SOS) 300 X 300 km NJSOS An Integrated & Sustained Observatory Satellites, RADAR, Gliders

  20. Regional-scale Observatories Process Studies Where do we go from here? Satellites CODAR Node/Moorings Ships/AUVs Gliders Sustained 2001 Integrated

  21. Nested Multi-Static CODAR Array Beach Buoys Boats

  22. 1998 1999 2000 2001

  23. Slocum Battery Glider Specifications Weight: 52 Kg Hull Diameter: 21.3 cm Vehicle Length: 1.5 meters Depth Range: 4 - 200 meters Speed: 0.4 m/sec horizontal Energy: Alkaline Batteries Nominal Payload: 4 Kg Endurance: Average, 30 days Range: 1500 km Navigation: GPS, and internal dead reckoning, altimeter Communications: RF modem, Iridium, ARGOS, Acoustic modem

  24. -Up to10-day deployments -Control shifted from local (NJ) and remotely (MA)

More Related