1 / 15

The Supreme Court

The Supreme Court. Jurisdiction. Is the authority of the courts to hear certain cases Under Constitution, federal courts have jurisdiction in cases regarding Federal law Treaties Interpretation of the Constitution.

carr
Download Presentation

The Supreme Court

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Supreme Court

  2. Jurisdiction • Is the authority of the courts to hear certain cases • Under Constitution, federal courts have jurisdiction in cases regarding • Federal law • Treaties • Interpretation of the Constitution

  3. Original Jurisdiction: have authority to hear cases for 1st time – lower courts • In federal system: district courts & S Court (in limited cases) • Where trials are conducted, evidence presented, juries determine outcome • Appellate jurisdiction: courts that hear reviews or appeals of decision in lower court • Court of Appeals & S Court • Concurrent jurisdiction: allows certain types of cases to be tried in either federal or state court

  4. Structure of the Judicial System • Constitutional Court: federal courts created by Congress under Article III & S Court • Included: district courts, Court of Appeals, Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit, U.S. Court of International Trade • Congress has created legislative courts to hear cases arising from powers given to Congress under Article I • Have narrower range of authority than constitutional courts • (Territorial Courts, U.S. Tax Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)

  5. District Courts • Created under Judiciary Act of 1789 • Serve as trial courts at federal level • Every state has at least 1 district court • Currently 94 districts • Have original jurisdiction; do not hear appeals • Decide civil & criminal cases arising under the Constitution, federal laws, treaties • > 80% of all federal cases heard here

  6. Courts of Appeals • Created 1891 to lessen work load of S Court • Decide appeals from district courts & reviews decisions of federal administrative agencies • States divided into circuits, or geographic judicial districts • Washington DC • Federal Circuit – hears cases involving federal agencies • 13 Courts of Appeals • Appellate jurisdiction only • May only review cases already decided by a lower court • Panel of judges

  7. Supreme Court • Only court actually created by Constitution • Highest court in federal judicial system • Final authority in dealing w/ questions from Constitution, federal laws, treaties • Original and appellate jurisdiction • Most cases are on appeal • Writ of certiorari grants – cases granted an appeal hearing from lower federal courts • Cases may come directly to S Court from: • State supreme courts • Federal law or Constitution is involved • Representatives of a foreign gov’t are involved • Certain types of cases were a state is a party

  8. Congress established current size of S Court at 9 in 1869 • 8 associates, 1 chief • All nominated by president & confirmed by Senate • Current members: • Chief: John Roberts (2005) • Associates: Ruth Bader Ginsburg (1993), Stephen Breyer (1994), Antonin Scalia (1986), Clarence Thomas (1991), Samuel Alito (2006), Anthony Kennedy (1988), Sonia Sotomayor (2009), Elena Kagen (2010)

  9. Judicial Selection • Federal judges appointed by president, confirmed by Senate • No formal qualifications • Serve “during good behavior” generally means life • To allow judges to be free from political pressures when deciding cases • May be removed through impeachment, conviction

  10. Lower Courts • Dept of State & White House staff handle these b/c of number of nominations • Senatorial courtesy: practice of allowing individual senators who represent state where district is located to approve or disapprove potential nominees • Traditionally used to make appointments to district courts • b/c Courts of Appeals cover several states, less senatorial influence & senatorial courtesy doesn’t play a role in nomination process

  11. Supreme Court • Higher visibility & importance demands greater attention from president to nomination of justices • Presidents only make an appointment if a vacancy occurs during their term • Things presidents consider when making appointments: • Party affiliation – choosing judges from own political party • From FDR to G. W. Bush (except Ford) – 90% of lower federal court judges came from own party • Judicial philosophy – appointing judges who share political ideology • Constitutional precedent, judicial activism, legal writings, past decisions

  12. Race, gender, religion, region – bring balance to the court or satisfy certain segments of society • Increasing number of minorities, women • Judicial experience – previous experiences as a judge in district, appeals, state courts • “litmus test” – ideological purity toward liberal or conservative stand on certain issues (i.e. abortion) • Acceptability – noncontroversial & therefore acceptable to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee & the Senate • American Bar Association – largest national organization of attorneys are often consulted by presidents, rates nominees’ qualifications • Interest groups – support/oppose nominee based on his/her position on issues of importance to interest group; use lobbyists • Justices – endorsements from members of S Court

  13. Contested S Court appointments • 1987: Reagan nominated Robert Bork, the assistant attorney general when Nixon fired Attorney General Elliot Richardson for not firing Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor hired to investigate Watergate • Bork did fire Cox • Bork conservative jurist & believed in judicial restraint • But his involvement in Watergate and some of his views about minorities and affirmative action led to rejection by Senate • Being “Borked” – appointee who does not get approved by Senate b/c of ideological reason

  14. 1991: G. H. W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas • Anita Hill accused Thomas of sexual harassment • Confirmation brought conflict between president’s constitutional authority to nominate person he feels best qualified • Narrowly confirmed 52-48 • 2005: Sandra Day O’Connor retired, G. W. Bush appointed John Roberts • Roberts very experienced – had clerked for Rehnquist, served on the DC Circuit Court, argued cases before the S Court • but then Rehnquist died, so Bush changed appointment to be the Chief Justice • Roberts described himself as “strict constructionist” • Became youngest Chief Justice since John Marshall

More Related