1 / 7

Follow the Money: Funding Mechanisms for Texas Institutions

Follow the Money: Funding Mechanisms for Texas Institutions. October 10, 2005 4:00 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board 2005 Governing Board Conference Closing the Gaps: Achieving Excellence Presented by: Jesse W. Rogers President, Midwestern State University

carla-reed
Download Presentation

Follow the Money: Funding Mechanisms for Texas Institutions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Follow the Money:Funding Mechanisms for Texas Institutions October 10, 2005 4:00 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board 2005 Governing Board Conference Closing the Gaps: Achieving Excellence Presented by: Jesse W. Rogers President, Midwestern State University Chairman, University Formula Advisory Committee Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

  2. Fiscal 2006Bill PatternMidwestern State University 1. Informational Listing of Appropriated Funds A. Instruction/Operations Fiscal 06 *A.1.1. Instructional and Operations Support $16,722,001 A.1.2. Teaching Experience Supplement $ 907,183 A.1.3. Staff Group Insurance Premiums $ 524,709 A.1.4. Workers’ Compensation Insurance $ 120,000 A.1.5. Texas Public Education Grants $ 1,200,491 A.1.6. Excellence Funding $ 136,968 B. Infrastructure Support *B.1.1 E&G Space Support $ 3,275,719 B.1.2. Tuition Revenue Bond $ 1,375,621 C. Special Item Support C.1.1. Small Business Development Center $ 113,399 C.2.1. Institutional Enhancement $ 2,474,402   D. Research Development Fund    D.1.1. Research Development Fund $ 9,470

  3. Cost Centers Employed*To Construct New Matrix • Faculty Salaries • Academic Support • Institutional Support • Student Services • Departmental Operating Expenses (all fund sources) *taken directly from Annual Financial Report

  4. FY04 and FY05Formula Matrix** **Abbrebiated

  5. FY06 and FY07Formula Matrix** **Abbreviated

  6. Formula Issues • The formulas are now related to the cost of operation by subject matter and level. • Since based on credit hour production, the formulas put money with student growth. • The formulas built-in funding differential accounts for university mission and level. • The formulas provide a clear and equitable manner of distributing available appropriated funds. • The formulas do not recognize quality issues. • Do the formulas encourage degree creep? • Finally, the formulas do not recognize the difference in cost in distance education methodology and traditional classroom methodology.

More Related