1 / 12

Additional considerations

Additional considerations. Saila Antila, PhD WHO consultant. Bioequivalence based on the metabolite. Reasons: pro-drug analytical difficulties in determination of the parent drug concentration of the active substance is too low drug unstable in the biological matrix

Download Presentation

Additional considerations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Additional considerations Saila Antila, PhD WHO consultant Training workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice & Bioequivalence, Kiev 3.-7.10.2005

  2. Bioequivalence based on the metabolite Reasons: • pro-drug • analytical difficulties in determination of the parent drug • concentration of the active substance is too low • drug unstable in the biological matrix • short half-life of the parent drug

  3. Bioequivalence based on the metabolite • if the metabolite contributes to the activity of the drug, the bioequivalence of the metabolite should be determined • if the pharmacokinetics of the drug is non-linear, both parent drug and metabolite should be measured

  4. Bioequivalence based on the metabolite • In bioequivalence studies measurement of the parent drug is generally recommended • concentration-time profile of the parent drug is more sensitive to changes in formulation performance • metabolite is more reflective of metabolite formation, distribution and elimination • measurement of inactive metabolite can be rarely justified

  5. Bioequivalence based on the metabolite • bioequivalence should be analysed using confidence interval approach • the metabolite data can be used to provide supportive evidence of comparable therapeutic outcome

  6. Stereochemistry and bioanalytics WHO • a non-stereoselective assay is currently acceptable for most pharmacokinetic bioequivalence studies • Stereoselective assay when • enantiomers have different pharmacological or metabolic profile • systemic availability non-linear

  7. Stereochemistry and bioanalytics Product containing chiral active substances should be based upon enantiomeric bioanalytical methods unless (EMEA): • both products contain the same stable single enantiomer • both products contain the racemate and both enantiomers show linear pharmacokinetics

  8. Stereochemistry and bioanalytics FDA: Measurement of of individual enantiomers is recommended only if • the enantiomers exhibit different pharmacodynamic characteristics • the enantiomers exhibit different pharmacokinetic characteristics continues

  9. Stereochemistry and bioanalytics (continues) • primary efficacy and safety resides with the minor enantiomer • nonlinear absorption is present

  10. Urine data • urine excretion data may be advantageous in determining the extend of drug input in case the drug is excreted predominately renally • if concentrations in blood are too small to be detected and over 40 % of the drug is eliminated unchanged in urine, then urine may serve as the biological fluid to be sampled

  11. Urine data • if urine excretion rate is measured, the product determined should represent a major fraction of the dose • not a good measure to describe absorption

  12. Urine data • sampling points or periods should be carefully chosen (at least 7-10 biological half-lives) • Sampling points for example: 0-2, 2-4, 4-8, 8-12, 12-24 hours • Ae =Cu x V • Ae= cumulative amount excreted • Cu = drug concentration in urine • V = urine volume • Excretion rate = dAe/dt

More Related