1 / 21

Significant predictors of self-esteem during adolescence

Significant predictors of self-esteem during adolescence. Gyöngyi Kökönyei, Ágnes Balogh. Self-esteem/definitions. Dynamic and changing construct G lobal and domain-specific William James (1 8 83) viewed self - esteem as the ratio of one’s successes to one’s p re t ensions.

callie-sweet
Download Presentation

Significant predictors of self-esteem during adolescence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Significant predictors of self-esteem during adolescence Gyöngyi Kökönyei, Ágnes Balogh

  2. Self-esteem/definitions • Dynamic and changing construct • Global and domain-specific • William James (1883) viewed self-esteemas the ratio of one’s successes to one’s pretensions. • Rosenberg (1979, p. 31) referred to self-esteem as a “positive or negative evaluation of the self.”

  3. Self-concept during adolescence • Main task: to establish identity (Erikson, 1962) and to restructure self-concept • The source of self-esteem • Essential component of mental health

  4. Sources of self-esteem These processes develop synergistically • Self-definition • Interpersonal relatedness • Family relationships (attachment, approval, loving) • Teachers opinion and approval • Social acceptance by peer (classmates and friends) • Physical attractiveness

  5. Changes in self-esteem by sex Baldwin and Hoffmann, 2002

  6. Women/girls Collectivist Ensembled Connected Men/boys Individualist Independent Autonomous Gender differences in self-schemas Do women and men have different self-concept? Do women and men (girls and boys) have different origins of self-esteem?

  7. Sources of self-esteem • Family relationships (approval, loving) • Teachers opinion and approval • Physical attractiveness • Social acceptance by peer Do the sources have higher impact on girls’ self-esteem?

  8. Method • Sample: Hungarian national sample of Health-Behaviour in School-aged Children study 2001/02 (age: 13-17, N=4539, male: 45%). • Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (Cronbach-alpha=0.83) • Gender and grade differences (t test and (M)ANOVA • Step-wise linear regression with dummy variables

  9. Gender differences in 7-11 grade students **p<0.01

  10. Two-way variance analyses Significant main effects and significant interaction (explained variance 4,3%)

  11. Body Image Index Family variables: Care, Overprotection, Communication Monitoring Communication with friends (talking about bothering things) Classmates Teachers FAS Self-esteem Model Predictors Dependent variable

  12. Body image (betai) Body image_indicator (betai1) Model with indicators for girls (an example)

  13. Body Image Index Body Image Index_D FamilyOverprotection Family Overprotection_D Family Communication Family Communication_D Communication with friends Communication with friends _D Classmates Classmates_D FAS FAS_D Self-esteem Model Predictors Dependent variable

  14. Results /7th grade students Family overprotection for boys: -0.19 Family overprotection for girls (-0,19+ -0,07): -0.26

  15. Results /9th grade students Family overprotection and FAS have impact on self-esteem only among girls

  16. Results /11th grade students Scale of classmates has impact on self-esteem only among girls Family overprotection for boys: -0,41 Family overprotection for girls: (-0.41+0.21): -0.20

  17. Discussion I. • Body Image is as strong predictor among girls as among boys. Results do not support the hypothetical difference. • Communication with family member seems to be one of the most robust predictors independently of sex and age (grade)

  18. Discussion II.Gender differences • The most robust result suggests that family overprotection has higher negative impact among girls in 7th and 9th grade, but in 11th grade its negative impact is higher among boys. • Overprotection means physical and psychological restriction • autonomy restriction (?) • Lack of social skills (?)

  19. Discussion III.Gender differences • Influence of classmates’acceptance has higher only among 11th grade girls

  20. Future direction • To develop factors including parental monitoring and attachment (care) as well. • To include teachers’ scale and school items as well • To compare value of betas for the same predictors in different grade (age) groups • To develop path analyses

  21. Thank you!

More Related