1 / 8

대한토목학회 2001 년도 학술발표대회

대한토목학회 2001 년도 학술발표대회. 풍하중을 받는 구조물의 3 차원 유한요소해석 Three-dimensional Finite Element Analyses of Structures under Wind Loads. 김병완 1) , 김운학 2) , 이인원 3) 1) 한국과학기술원 토목공학과 박사과정 2) 국립한경대학교 토목공학과 교수 3) 한국과학기술원 토목공학과 교수. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Beam analyses of wind-loaded structures

brownf
Download Presentation

대한토목학회 2001 년도 학술발표대회

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 대한토목학회 2001년도 학술발표대회 풍하중을 받는 구조물의 3차원 유한요소해석 Three-dimensional Finite Element Analyses of Structures under Wind Loads 김병완1), 김운학2), 이인원3) 1) 한국과학기술원 토목공학과 박사과정 2) 국립한경대학교 토목공학과 교수 3) 한국과학기술원 토목공학과 교수

  2. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Beam analyses of wind-loaded structures 3. Plate analyses of wind-loaded structures 4. Numerical example 5. Conclusions

  3. 1. Introduction Systematic comparison of simplified beam analyses and three-dimensional plate analyses is presented to verify disadvantages of simplified beam analyses of structures under wind loads. 2. Beam analyses of wind-loaded structures - Structural modeling with finite beam elements - Evaluation of lift, drag and moment coefficients - Calculation of lift, drag and moment per unit length - Solution of dynamic equation of motion 3. Plate analyses of wind-loaded structures - Structural modeling with triangular finite plate elements - Evaluation of pressure coefficient at each element - Calculation of wind load vector at each element - Solution of dynamic equation of motion

  4. 4. Numerical example • Example structure Young’s modulus: 2.5105 kgf/cm2 mass density: 2.446 10-6 kgf-sec2/cm4 thickness: 60 cm Poisson ratio: 0.17 damping ratio: 5 % • Example wind based on the data at Skipheia(K.S. Hansen and M.S. Courtney, 1999) wind density: 1.250 10-9 kgf-sec2/cm4 (angle of attack): 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 degree

  5. Pressure coefficients of the example structure calculated from Abernathy's formula(F.H. Abernathy, 1962) • Lift, drag and moment coefficients of the example structure • Finite element model of the example structure finite beam element model finite plate element model

  6. Member forces max. bending moments at the center line max. torsional moments at the edge line max. principal stresses at the center line

  7. Member forces along the width directions bending moments along the center line (time: 154sec) torsional moments along the edge line (time: 154 sec)

  8. 5. Conclusions - Bending moments and principal stresses from beam analyses are similar to those from plate analyses. On the other hand, torsional moments from beam analyses are quite different from those from plate analyses. - Member forces which vary along width directions can be obtained from plate analyses, whereas those cannot be exactly calculated from beam analyses due to the limitation of the analyses that constant member forces are obtained along width directions. - Therefore, three-dimensional plate analyses are required to exactly calculate torsional moments and width-directional member forces of structures under wind loads, instead of simplified beam analyses.

More Related